Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T13:12:21.543Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Total Nonstructural Carbohydrates and Regrowth in Honey Mesquite (Prosopis glandulosa) Following Hand Defoliation or Clopyralid Treatment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Harry T. Cralle
Affiliation:
Dep. Soil & Crop Sciences, Texas A&M Univ., College Staiton, TX 77843
Rodney W. Bovey
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS, Dep. of Range Land Ecology and Management, Texas A&M Univ., College Staiton, TX 77843

Abstract

Greenhouse experiments were conducted to assess the storage of nonstructural carbohydrates in the stems and roots of honey mesquite and their mobilization and utilization following defoliation by hand or clopyralid. All leaves were removed by hand from one group of plants while leaving stems intact. Another group received a foliar spray of clopyralid at a sublethal acid equivalent rate of 0.07 kg ha−1. Samplings at treatment on day 0 and at 14, 28, 42, and 58 d after treatment measured leaf area; dry weight of leaves, stems, and roots; and grams and percent total nonstructural carbohydrates in stems and roots. Controls accumulated dry weight and grams total nonstructural carbohydrates in stems and roots, while maintaining a constant percent total nonstructural carbohydrates throughout the experiment. Percent and grams total nonstructural carbohydrates in stems and roots of hand defoliated plants decreased by about one-half from day 0 to 14 as new leaf growth occurred, but increased and returned to pretreatment levels on day 28. A similiar, though slower, pattern of decline and recovery of total nonstructural carbohydrates in stems and roots occurred in response to defoliation by clopyralid. These results showed that the nonstructural carbohydrates in stems and roots of honey mesquite were important sources of carbohydrates to support new leaf regrowth following defoliation by hand or herbicide.

Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Ansley, R. J., Price, D. L., Dowhower, S. L., and Carlson, D. H., 1992. Seasonal trends in leaf area of honey mesquite trees: determination using image analysis. J. Range Manage. 45: 339344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Bouse, L. F. and Bovey, R. W., 1967. A laboratory sprayer for potted plants. Weeds 15: 8991.Google Scholar
3. Bovey, R. W., Hein, H. Jr., and Meyer, R. E. 1988. Mode of clopyralid uptake by honey mesquite (Prosopis glandulosa). Weed Sci. 36: 269272.Google Scholar
4. Bovey, R. W. and Whisnant, S. G. 1991. Control of honey mesquite with clopyralid, triclopyr, or clopyralid:triclopyr mixtures. J. Range Manage. 44: 5255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Brown, J. R. and Archer, S. 1990. Water relations of a perennial grass and seedling vs. adult woody plants in a subtropical Savanna, Texas. Oikos 57: 366374.Google Scholar
6. Cralle, H. T. and Heichel, G. H. 1981. Nitrogen fixation and vegetative regrowth of alfalfa and birdsfoot trefoil after successive harvests or floral debudding. Plant Physiol. 67: 898905.Google Scholar
7. Fick, W. H. 1978. Carbohydrate storage and translocation in honey mesquite as affected by soil moisture, soil temperature, and phenological development. , Lubbock, TX. Texas Tech University, 105 pp.Google Scholar
8. Fisher, C. E., Meadows, C. H., and Behrens, R. 1956. Some factors that influence the effectiveness of 2, 4, 5-trichlorophenoxyacetic acid in killing mesquite. Weed Sci. 4: 139147.Google Scholar
9. Gibbens, R. P., Beck, R. F., McNeely, R. P., and Herel, C. H. 1992. Recent rates of mesquite establishment in the northern Chihuahuan Desert. J. Range Manage. 45: 585588.Google Scholar
10. Heichel, G. H., Delaney, R. H., and Cralle, H. T. 1988. Carbon assimilation, partitioning and utilization. Pages 195228 in Hansen, A. D., Barnes, D. K., and Hill, R. R., ed. Alfalfa and alfalfa improvement. Amer. Soc. Agron. Monograph No. 29. Madison, WI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Jacoby, P. W. Jr. and Ansley, R. J. 1991. Mesquite: classification, distribution, ecology, and control. Pages 364376. in James, L. F., Evans, J. O., Ralphs, M. H., and Dennis, R. D. ed. Noxious Range Weeds. Westview Press, Boulder, CO.Google Scholar
12. Jacoby, P. W., Ansley, R. J., Meadors, C. H., and Cuomo, C. J. 1990. Control of honey mesquite with herbicides: influence of stem number. J. Range Manage. 43: 3638.Google Scholar
13. Meyer, R. E. and Bovey, R. W., 1985. Response of honey mesquite (Prosopis glandulosa) and understory vegetation to herbicides. Weed Sci. 33: 537543.Google Scholar
14. Meyer, R. E. and Bovey, R. W. 1986. Influence of environment and stage of growth on honey mesquite (Prosopis glandulosa) response to herbicides. Weed Sci. 34: 287299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Meyer, R. E., Morton, H. L., Haas, R.H.H., and Robeson, E. D. 1971. Morphology and anatomy of honey mesquite. Tech Bull. No. 1423. USDA.Google Scholar
16. Smith, D. 1981. Removing and analyzing total nonstructural carbohydrates from plant tissue. Wis. Agr. Bull. R2107 Univer. of Wis., Madison, WI.Google Scholar
17. Wan, C. and Sosebee, R. E. 1990. Relationship of photosynthetic rate and edaphic factors to root carbohydrate trends in honey mesquite. J. Range Manage. 43: 171176.Google Scholar
18. Wan, C. and Sosebee, R. E. 1991. Water relations and transpiration of honey mesquite on 2 sites in West Texas. J. Range Manage. 44: 156160.Google Scholar
19. Wilson, R. T., Dahl, B. E., and Krieg, D. R. 1975. Carbohydrate concentrations in honey mesquite roots in relation to phenological development and reproductive condition. J. Range Manage. 28: 286289.Google Scholar