Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T09:24:56.822Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Toxicity, Uptake, Translocation, and Metabolism of Norflurazon in Five Citrus Rootstocks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Nagi Reddy Achhireddy
Affiliation:
Univ. Florida, IFAS, Citrus Res. and Educ. Ctr., Lake Alfred, FL 33850
Megh Singh
Affiliation:
Univ. Florida, IFAS, Citrus Res. and Educ. Ctr., Lake Alfred, FL 33850

Abstract

Five varieties of 3-month-old citrus rootstocks were grown for 1 month in nutrient solution containing 0, 10-3, 10-4, or 10-5 M of norflurazon [4-chloro-5-(methylamino)-2-(3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)-3 (2H)-pyridazinone] to assess the effect of this herbicide on growth and chlorophyll levels. The uptake, translocation, and metabolism of root-applied 14C-norflurazon was also examined in these rootstocks. Norflurazon treatment reduced chlorophyll level and lowered overall growth in sour orange (Citrus aurantium), Swingle (Poncirus trifoliata × C. paradisi), Milam (C. jambhiri), and Cleopatra mandarin (C. reshni) rootstocks. Herbicide treatments had little or no effect on chlorophyll levels or growth in Carrizo (C. sinensis × P. trifoliata). In Cleopatra, unlike in other rootstocks, leaf chlorosis was evident only along the midrib and major veins. Herbicide treatment reduced leaf flush (leaf production) in Swingle but not in other rootstocks. By the end of a 4-week treatment period, total absorption of 14C-norflurazon was greater in Swingle than in the other rootstocks. 14C-norflurazon detected in the roots (excluding taproot) of Swingle was greater than in the other rootstocks. The amount of 14C-norflurazon translocation to the foliage was limited in all rootstocks. Stem and taproot also contained only a small amount of 14C-norflurazon. Leaf extracts of all five rootstocks contained no parent compound, but up to 90% of recovered 14C was identified as 14C-norflurazon in root extracts. Differences in the uptake, translocation, and metabolism of norflurazon among citrus rootstocks were small and did not appear to explain their differential sensitivity to this herbicide.

Type
Weed Control and Herbicide Technology
Copyright
Copyright © 1986 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bartels, P. B. and Watson, C. W. 1978. Inhibition of carotenoid synthesis by fluridone and norflurazon. Weed Sci. 26:198203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Devlin, R. M. and Karczmarczyk, S. J. 1975. Influence of norflurazon on chlorophyll production. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 29:161168.Google Scholar
3. Hoagland, D. R. and Arnon, D. I. 1950. The water culture method for growing plants without soil. Calif. Agric. Exp. Stn. Circ. 347.Google Scholar
4. Ross, C. W. 1974. Plant Physiology Laboratory Manual. Pages 183184. Wadsworth Publications, California.Google Scholar
5. Singh, M. and Achhireddy, N. R. 1984. Tolerance of citrus rootstocks to preemergence herbicides. J. Environ. Hort. 3:7376.Google Scholar
6. St. John, J. B. and Hilton, J. L. 1976. Structure versus activity of substituted pyridazinones as related to mechanism of action. Weed Sci. 24:579582.Google Scholar
7. Strang, R. H. and Rogers, R. L. 1974. Behavior and fate of two phenylpyridazinone herbicides in cotton, corn, and soybean. J. Agric. Food Chem. 22:11191125.Google Scholar
8. Yamaguchi, S. and Crafts, A. S. 1958. Autoradiographic method for studying absorption and translocation of herbicides using 14C-labeled compounds. Hilgardia. 28:161191.Google Scholar