Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T13:52:25.069Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Transgressive segregation and maternal genetic effects of non–target site fluazifop-P-butyl tolerance in Zoysia spp.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2019

Wenwen Liu ,
Kevin E. Kenworthy ,
Gregory E. MacDonald ,
J. Bryan Unruh ,
Laurie E. Trenholm  and
Ramon G. Leon Open the ORCID record for Ramon G. Leon [Opens in a new window]
Wenwen Liu
Affiliation:
Graduate Research Assistant, Department of Agronomy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
Kevin E. Kenworthy
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Agronomy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
Gregory E. MacDonald
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Agronomy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
J. Bryan Unruh
Affiliation:
Professor, West Florida Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Jay, FL, USA
Laurie E. Trenholm
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Environmental Horticulture, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
Ramon G. Leon*
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Ramon G. Leon, Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695. Email: rleon@ncsu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Zoysia germplasm exhibit different levels of sensitivity to fluazifop-P-butyl, but the genetic factors responsible for such differences are unknown. Segregation patterns of the fluazifop-P-butyl tolerance trait were studied under greenhouse conditions. In total, 244 F1 lines were generated from multiple crosses between the tolerant line 5337-2 (non–target site tolerance) and three more-sensitive lines (123, 252, and 5330-23). Progeny segregation showed that fluazifop-P-butyl tolerance within zoysiagrass (Zoysia spp.) is expressed as a quantitative trait with a wide range of intermediate phenotypes between parental phenotypes. Transgressive segregation was extensive and largely favored susceptibility in most families, but was especially evident for 5337-2 × 123 and 5337-2 × 5330-23. The segregation patterns for biomass reduction and percent injury were different within reciprocal crosses and among three different family crosses. Reciprocal effects were observed in growth reduction for 5337-2 × 5330-23, in percent injury at 3 wk after the treatment (WAT), and for 5337-2 × 252 at 6 WAT. This indicated that fluazifop-P-butyl tolerance was not completely controlled by nuclear genetic factors in 5337-2 and maternal/cytoplasmic inheritance was also partially responsible. These results suggested that fluazifop-P-butyl tolerance may be attributed to multiple genetic mechanisms, which could present a challenge for future breeding efforts because of the difficulty of fixing multiple traits within a breeding population.

Keywords

Te-Ming Paul Tseng, Mississippi State UniversityAcetyl-coenzyme A carboxylaseACCaseherbicide resistancegenetic diversitygraminicideinheritanceheritabilityquantitative trait.
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 67 , Issue 5 , September 2019 , pp. 504 - 509
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anonymous (2009) Fusilade® II product label. Syngenta Crop Protection. Greensboro, NC: Syngenta. 37 pGoogle Scholar
Bernasconi, P, Woodworth, AR, Rosen, BA, Subramanian, MV, Siehl, DL (1995) A naturally occurring point mutation confers broad range tolerance to herbicides that target acetolactate synthase. J Biol Chem 270:17381–17385 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burton, JD, Gronwald, JD, Somers, DA, Gengenbach, BG, Wyse, DL (1989) Inhibition of corn acetyl-CoA carboxylase by cyclohexanedione and aryloxyphenoxypropionate herbicides. Pest Biochem Physiol 34:76–85 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlborg, O, Haley, CS (2004) Epistasis: too often neglected in complex trait studies? Nat Rev Genet 5:618–625 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carmer, SG, Nyquist, WE, Walker, WM (1989) Least significant differences for combined analysis of experiments with two or three factor treatment designs. Agron J 81:665–672 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr, JE, Davies, LG, Cobb, AH, Pallet, KE (1985) The metabolic activity of fluazifop acid in excised apical meristem sections. Proc British Crop Prot Conf—Weeds 1:155–162 Google Scholar
Comstock, VE, Andersen, RN (1968) An inheritance study of tolerance to atrazine in a cross of flax (Linum usitatissimum L.). Crop Sci 8:508–509 Google Scholar
Délye, C, Gardin, JAC, Boucansaud, K, Chauvel, B, Petit, C (2011) Non-target-site-based resistance should be the centre of attention for herbicide resistance research: Alopecurus myosuroides as an illustration. Weed Res 51:433–437 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gressel, J, Valverde, BE (2009) A strategy to provide long-term control of weedy rice while mitigating herbicide resistance transgene flow, and its potential use for other crops with related weeds. Pest Manag Sci 65:723–731 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grogan, CO, Eastin, EF, Palmer, RD (1963) Inheritance of susceptibility of a line of maize to simazine and atrazine. Crop Sci 3:451 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, PK, Langridge, P, Mir, RR (2010) Marker-assisted wheat breeding: present status and future possibilities. Mol Breed 26:145–161 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatfield, PM, Shoemaker, RC, Palmer, RG (1985) Maternal inheritance of chloroplast DNA within the genus Glycine, subgenus soja . J Hered 76:373–374 Google Scholar
Hayes, JD, Pfeiffer, R, Rana, MS (1965) The genetic response of barley to DDT and Barban and its significance in crop protection. Weed Res 5:191–206 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heckart, DL, Parrott, WA, Raymer, PL (2010) Obtaining sethoxydim resistance in seashore paspalum. Crop Sci 50:2632–2640 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, W, Richards, S, Carbone, MA, Zhu, D, Anholt, RRH, Ayroles, JF, Duncan, L, Jordan, KW, Lawrence, F, Magwire, MM, Warner, CB, Blankenburg, K, Han, Y, Javaid, M, Jayaseelan, J, Jhangiani, SH, Muzny, D, Ongeri, F, Perales, L, Wu, YQ, Zhang, Y, Zou, X, Stone, EA, Gibbs, RA, Mackay, TF (2012) Epistasis dominates the genetic architecture of Drosophila quantitative traits. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:15553–15559 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, BJ (1987) Turfgrass species response to herbicides applied postemergence. Weed Technol 1:305–311 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, BJ, Duncan, RR (1997) Tolerance of four seashore paspalum (Paspalum vaginatum) cultivars to postemergence herbicides. Weed Technol 11:689–692 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindhout, P (2002) The perspectives of polygenic resistance in breeding for durable disease resistance. Euphytica 124:217–226 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, W, MacDonald, GE, Unruh, JB, Kenworthy, KE, Trenholm, LE, Leon, RG (2019a) Variation in tolerance mechanisms to fluazifop-P-butyl among selected zoysiagrass lines. Weed Sci 67:288–295 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, W, Unruh, BJ, Kenworthy, KE, MacDonald, GE, Trenholm, LE, Leon, RG (2019b) Application timing affects tolerance of zoysiagrass to fluazifop-P-butyl and safening effect of triclopyr. Crop Sci, 10.2135/cropsci2018.12.0724 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Z, Li, P, Sun, X, Zhou, F, Yang, C, Li, L, Matsumoto, H, Luo, X (2017) Fluazifop-P-butyl induced ROS generation with IAA (indole-3-acetic acid) oxidation in Acanthospermum hispidum D.C. Pest Biochem Physiol 143:312–318 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCalla, JH, Richardson, MD, Karcher, DE, Boyd, JW (2004) Tolerance of seedling bermudagrass to postemergence herbicides. Crop Sci 44:1330–1336 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patton, AJ, Schwartz, BM, Kenworthy, KE (2017) Zoysiagrass (Zoysia spp.) history, utilization, and improvement in the United States: a review. Crop Sci 57:S37–S72 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reboud, X, Zeyl, C (1994) Organelle inheritance in plants. Heredity 72:132–140 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rendina, AR, Felts, JM, Beaudoin, JD, Craig-Kennard, AC, Look, LL, Paraskos, SL, Hagenah, JA (1988) Kinetic characterization, stereoselectivity, and species selectivity of the inhibition of plant acetyl-CoA carboxylase by the aryloxyphenoxypropionic acid grass herbicides. Arch Biochem Biophys 265:219–225 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schneider, KA, Brothers, ME, Kelly, JD (1997) Marker-assisted selection to improve drought resistance in common bean. Crop Sci 37:51–60 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schooler, AB, Bell, AR, Nalewaja, JD (1972) Inheritance of siduron tolerance in foxtail barley. Weed Sci 20:167–169 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, KR, Putwain, PD (1981) Maternal inheritance of simazine resistance in a population of Senecio vulgaris . Weed Res 21:137–140 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stafford, RG, Comstock, VE, Ford, JH (1968) Inheritance of tolerance in flax (Linum usitattisumum L.) treated with MCPA. Crop Sci 8:423–426 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Unruh, JB, Stephenson, DO, Brecke, BJ, Trenholm, LE (2006) Tolerance of ‘Salam’ seashore paspalum (Paspalum vaginatum) to postemergence herbicides. Weed Technol 20:612–616 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Unruh, JB, Trenholm, LE, Cisar, JL (2005) Zoysiagrass for Florida Lawns. ENH11. Gainesville: University of Florida Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences. 8 p. http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/lh011. Accessed: September 23, 2018Google Scholar
Whaley, CM, Wilson, HP, Westwood, JH (2007) A new mutation in plant ALS confers resistance to five classes of ALS-inhibiting herbicides. Weed Sci 55:83–90 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodson, JD, Chory, J (2008) Coordination of gene expression between organellar and nuclear genomes. Nat Rev Genet 9:383–395 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wright, CE (1968) A preliminary examination of the differential reaction of perennial and Italian ryegrass cultivars to grass-killing herbicides. Pages 477–483 in Proceedings of the 9th British Weed Control Conference. Brighton, UK: British Crop Protection Council Google Scholar