Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T07:23:51.867Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Uptake and Translocation of Diallate in Wheat, Barley, Flax, and Wild Oat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

John D. Nalewaja*
Affiliation:
North Dakota State University, Fargo

Abstract

Uptake and translocation of 14C label from S-2,3-dichloroallyl N,N-diisopropylthiolcarbamate (diallate) by roots and coleoptiles of wild oat (Avena fatua L.), wheat (Triticum aestivum L., var. Selkirk), barley (Hordeum vulgare L., var. Traill), and flax (Linum usitatissimum L., var. Bolley) were compared. The pattern of 14C label uptake and movement was similar in wild oat, barley, and wheat. However, translocation of the 14C label to the roots of wild oat was less than for barley. Although differential uptake and translocation per se did not appear to account for the selectivity of diallate for wild oat, some differences in translocation may have beep the result of metabolic breakdown products.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Appleby, A. P., Furtick, W. R., and Fang, S. C. 1965. Soil placement studies with EPTC and other carbamate herbicides on Avena sativa . Weed Res. 5:115122.Google Scholar
2. Friesen, H. A., Banting, J. D., and Walker, D. R. 1962. The effect of placement and concentration of 2,3-DCDT on the selective control of wild oats in wheat. Can. J. Plant Sci. 42:91104.Google Scholar
3. Parker, C. 1963. Factors affecting the selectivity of 2,3-dichloroallyldiisopropylthiocarbamate (diallate) against Avena spp. in wheat and barley. Weed Res. 3:259276.Google Scholar
4. Selleck, G. W. 1958. Various herbicides for wild oats control. Res. Rept. of the Nat. Weed Comm. of Can., Western Sect. pp. 4849.Google Scholar