Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T05:33:18.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Use of Logistic Equation for Detection of the Initial Parasitism Phase of Egyptian Broomrape (Phelipanche aegyptiaca) in Tomato

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Jhonathan E. Ephrath ,
Josseph Hershenhorn ,
Guy Achdari ,
Shalom Bringer  and
Hanan Eizenberg
Jhonathan E. Ephrath*
Affiliation:
Wyler Department of Dryland Agriculture, French Associates Institute for Agriculture and Biotechnology of Drylands, Jacob Blaustein Institutes for Desert Research, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Sede Boqer Campus, 84990 Midreshet Sede Boqer, Israel
Josseph Hershenhorn
Affiliation:
Agriculture Research Organization, Newe Ya'ar Research Center, P.O. Box 1021, Ramat Yishay 30095, Israel
Guy Achdari
Affiliation:
Agriculture Research Organization, Newe Ya'ar Research Center, P.O. Box 1021, Ramat Yishay 30095, Israel
Shalom Bringer
Affiliation:
Agriculture Research Organization, Newe Ya'ar Research Center, P.O. Box 1021, Ramat Yishay 30095, Israel
Hanan Eizenberg
Affiliation:
Agriculture Research Organization, Newe Ya'ar Research Center, P.O. Box 1021, Ramat Yishay 30095, Israel
*
Corresponding author's E-mail:yoni@bgu.ac.il
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The dynamics of the host–parasite relationship between tomato cv. Brigade and Egyptian broomrape is temperature-related. This relationship was utilized for the development of an equation on the basis of thermal time (as measured by growing degree days, GDD, C) to predict the parasitism dynamics of Egyptian broomrape in tomato. To obtain a reliable prediction from thermal time values, studies based on a wide range of temperatures are essential. Four temperature-regime treatments and five levels of infestation with Egyptian broomrape seeds were tested in a multiclimate greenhouse (phytotron) and a temperature-controlled greenhouse, respectively. The day/night temperature regimes were 20/12 C, 23/15 C, 26/18 C, and 29/21 C and the infestation levels were 0 (noninfested control), 1, 5, 10, and 25 mg of Egyptian broomrape seeds per liter of soil. As expected, increasing temperature or infestation levels resulted in faster appearance and higher rate of attachments, respectively. The relation between development of attachments and GDD was described as a three-parameter logistic curve. In both temperature-regime and infestation-level experiments, the development of attachments began 200 GDD after planting and the maximal number of attachments was recorded 800 GDD after planting. A significant reduction in the aboveground biomass of the tomato plants due to increased Egyptian broomrape biomass was recorded only for the 26/18 C and 29/21 C day/night treatments and the three highest infestation levels (5, 10, and 25 mg L−1 soil). The ability to predict the start of parasitism can be used to develop a climate-based system for Egyptian broomrape control with herbicides.

Keywords

Egyptian broomrapePhelipanche aegyptiaca Pers. (syn. Orobanche aegyptiaca)tomatoLycopersicon esculentum LGrowing degree days (GDD)simulationphytotron
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 60 , Issue 1 , March 2012 , pp. 57 - 63
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Aly, R., Goldwasser, Y., Eizenberg, H., Hershenhorn, J., Golan, S., and Kleifeld, Y. 2001. Broomrape (Orobanche cumana) control in sunflower (Helianthus annuus) in fields. Weed Technol. 15:306–309.Google Scholar
Brown, R. F. and Mayer, D. G. 1988. Representing cumulative germination. The use of the Weibull function and other empirically derived curves. Ann. Bot. 61:127–138.Google Scholar
Castejon-Munoz, M., Romero-Munoz, F., and Garcia-Torres, L. 1993. Effect of planting date on broomrape (Orobanche cernua Loefl) infection on sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Weed Res. 33:171–176.Google Scholar
Eizenberg, H., Colquhoun, J. B., and Mallory-Smith, C. A. 2005. A predictive degree-days model for small broomrape (Orobanche minor) parasitism in red clover (Trifolium pratense) in Oregon. Weed Sci. 53:37–40.Google Scholar
Eizenberg, H., Colquhoun, J. B., and Mallory-Smith, C. A. 2004b. The relationship between growing degree days and small broomrape (Orobanche minor) parasitism in red clover. Weed Sci. 52:735–741.Google Scholar
Eizenberg, H., Colquhoun, J. B., and Mallory-Smith, C. A. 2006. Imazamox application timing for small broomrape (Orobanche minor) control in red clover. Weed Sci. 54:923–927.Google Scholar
Eizenberg, H., Goldwasser, Y., Golan, S., Plakhine, D., and Hershenhorn, J. 2004a. Egyptian broomrape (Orobanche aegyptiaca) control in tomato with sulfonylurea herbicides—greenhouse studies. Weed Technol. 18:490–496.Google Scholar
Eizenberg, H., Hershenhorn, J., and Ephrath, J. E. 2009. Factors affecting the efficacy of Orobanche cumana chemical control in sunflower. Weed Res. 49:308–315.Google Scholar
Eizenberg, H., Plakhine, D., Hershenhorn, J., Kleifeld, Y., and Rubin, B. 2003. Resistance to broomrape (Orobanche spp.) in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) is temperature dependent. J. Exp. Bot. 54:1305–1311.Google Scholar
Eizenberg, H., Tanaami, Z., Jacobsohn, R., and Rubin, B. 2001. Effect of temperature on the relationship between Orobanche spp. and carrot (Daucus carota L.). Crop Prot. 20:415–420.Google Scholar
Eizenberg, H., Tanaami, Z., Ovdat, N., Rubin, B., and Jacobsohn, J. 1998. Effect of seasonal conditions on host–parasite relationship in Orobanche crenata and O. aegyptiaca . Pages 187–193 in Wegmann, K., Musselman, L. J., and Joel, D. M., eds. Current Problems of Orobanche Research. Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Orobanche Research. Albena, Bulgaria.Google Scholar
Ephrath, J. E. and Eizenberg, H. 2010. Quantification of the dynamics of Orobanche cumana and Phelipanche aegyptiaca parasitism in confectionery sunflower. Weed Res. 50:140–152.Google Scholar
Goldwasser, Y., Eizenberg, H., Golan, S., Hershenhorn, J., and Kleifeld, Y. 2001. Orobanche aegyptiaca control in Potato. Crop Prot. 20:403–410.Google Scholar
Goldwasser, Y., Eizenberg, H., Golan, S., Hershenhorn, J., and Kleifeld, Y. 2003. Control of Orobanche crenata and O. aegyptiaca in parsley. Crop Prot. 22:295–305.Google Scholar
Grenz, J. H., Istoc, V. A., Manschadi, A. M., and Sauerborn, J. 2008. Interactions of sunflower (Helianthus annuus) and sunflower broomrape (Orobanche cumana) as affected by sowing date, resource supply and infestation level. Field Crops Res. 107:170–179.Google Scholar
Grenz, J. H., Manschadi, A. M., Uygur, F. N., and Sauerborn, J. 2005. Effects of environment and sowing date on the competition between faba bean (Vicia faba) and the parasitic weed Orobanche crenata . Field Crop Res. 93:300–313.Google Scholar
Hershenhorn, J., Eizenberg, H., Dor, E., Kapulnik, Y., and Goldwasser, Y. 2009. Phelipanche aegyptiaca management in tomato. Weed Res. 49:34–47.Google Scholar
Hershenhorn, J., Goldwasser, Y., Plakhine, D., et al. 1998. Orobanche aegyptiaca control in tomato fields with sulfonylurea herbicides. Weed Res. 38:343–349.Google Scholar
Hibberd, J. M., Quick, W. P., Press, M. C., and Scholes, J. D. 1998. Can source–sink relations explain responses of tobacco to infection by the root holoparasitic angiosperm Orobanche cernua? Plant Cell Environ. 21:333–340.Google Scholar
Joel, D. M., Hershenhorn, J., Eizenberg, H., Aly, R., Ejeta, G., Rich, P. J., Ransom, J. K., Sauerborn, J., and Rubiales, D. 2007. Biology and management of weedy root parasites (review). Hort. Rev. 33:267–350.Google Scholar
Kebreab, E. and Murdoch, A. J. 1999. A quantitative model for loss of primary dormancy and induction of secondary dormancy in imbibed seeds of Orobanche spp. J. Exp. Bot. 50:211–219.Google Scholar
Lins, R., Colquhoun, J. B., Cole, C. M., and Mallory-Smith, C. A. 2005. Postemergence herbicide options for small broomrape (Orobanche minor) control in red clover (Trifolium pratense). Weed Technol. 19:411–415.Google Scholar
Lins, R. D., Colquhoun, J. B., and Mallory-Smith, C. A. 2007. Effect of small broomrape (Orobanche minor) on red clover growth and dry matter partitioning. Weed Sci. 55:517–520.Google Scholar
McMaster, G. S. and Wilhelm, W. W. 1997. Growing degree-days: one equation, two interpretations. Agric. For. Meteorol. 87:291–300.Google Scholar
Mesa-García, J. and García Torres, L. 1986. Effect of planting date on parasitism of broad bean (Vicia faba) by crenate broomrape (Orobanche crenata). Weed Sci. 34:544–550.Google Scholar
Onofri, A., Carbonell, E. A., Piepho, H. P., Mortimer, A. M., and Cousens, R. D. 2009. Current statistical issues in weed research. Weed Res. 50:5–24.Google Scholar
Parker, C. 2009. Observations on the current status of Orobanche and Striga problems worldwide. Pest Manag. Sci. 65:453–459.Google Scholar
Parker, C. and Riches, C. R. 1993. Orobanche species: The broomrapes. Pages 111–164 in Parker, C., and Riches, C. R., eds. Parasitic Weeds of the World: Biology and Control. Wallingford, UK CAB International.Google Scholar
Plakhine, D., Ziadna, H., and Joel, D. M. 2009. Is seed conditioning essential for Orobanche germination? Pest Manag. Sci. 65:492–496.Google Scholar
Sauerborn, J., Linke, K. H., Saxena, M. C., and Kock, W. 1989. Solarization: a physical control for weeds and parasitic plants (Orobanche spp.) in Mediterranean agriculture. Weed Res. 29:391–397.Google Scholar
Scholberg, J., McNeal, B. L., Jones, J. W., and Boote, K. J. 2000. Growth and canopy characteristics of field-grown tomato. Agron. J. 92:152–159.Google Scholar
Serghini, K., Perez de Luque, A., Munoz, M. C., Torres, L. G., and Jorrin, J. V. 2001. Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) response to broomrape (Orobanche cernua Loefi.) parasitism: induced synthesis and excretion of 7-hydroxylated simple coumarins. J. Exp. Bot. 52:2227–2234.Google Scholar
Soltani, A., Robertson, M. J., Mohammad-Nejad, Y., and Rahemi-Karizaki, A. 2006. Modeling chickpea growth and development: leaf production and senescence. Field Crop Res. 99:14–23.Google Scholar
Van Der Ploeg, A. and Heuvelink, E. 2005. Influence of suboptimal temperature on tomato growth and yield: a review. J. Hort. Sci. Biotechnol. 80(6):652–659.Google Scholar
van Hezewijk, M. J. 1994. Germination Ecology of Orobanche crenata: Implication for Cultural Control Measures. Ph.D. dissertation. Amsterdam, the Netherlands Amsterdam University. 162 p.Google Scholar
Wolf, S. and Rudich, J. 1988. The growth rates of fruits on different parts of the tomato plant and the effect of water stress on dry weight accumulation. Sci. Hort. 34:1–11.Google Scholar
Wolf, S., Rudich, J., Marani, A., and Rekah, Y. 1986. Predicting harvesting date of processing tomatoes by a simulation model. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 111:11–16.Google Scholar