Hostname: page-component-7f64f4797f-6fdxz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-04T13:44:56.601Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Volatility of Dichlobenil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

J. V. Parochetti ,
E. R. Hein  and
S. R. Colby
J. V. Parochetti
Affiliation:
Agronomy Department, University of Maryland, College Park
E. R. Hein
Affiliation:
Agronomy Department, University of Maryland, College Park
S. R. Colby
Affiliation:
Agronomy Department, University of Maryland, College Park
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Vapor losses of 2,6-dichlorobenzonitrile (dichlobenil) were studied under controlled laboratory conditions by trapping vapors directly in a magnesia silica absorbant. Vapor losses increased with increasing temperature. Herbicide loss from a spray formulation in 3 hr amounted to 10% at 30 C and 18% at 40 C. Volatility increased as the soil moisture level increased from air dryness to field capacity. However, as the moisture level was increased to saturation, vapor losses remained similar to losses at field capacity. Volatility from a granular formulation was reduced when compared to the spray application. Volatility decreased as the cation exchange capacity of the soils increased.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 19 , Issue 1 , January 1971 , pp. 28 - 31
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

1. Barnsley, G. E. and Rosher, P. H. 1961. The relationship between the herbicidal effect of 2,6-dichlorobenzonitrile and its persistence in the soil. Weed Res. 1:147–158.Google Scholar
2. Daams, J. 1965. Das Verhalten von Dichlobenil in Boden und Pflanze. Zeitschrift fue Pflanzenkrankheighten (Pflanzepathologie) und Pflanzenschut (Sonderheft III) 172:139–144.Google Scholar
3. Gray, R. A. and Weierich, A. J. 1965. Factors effecting vapor losses of EPTC from soils. Weeds 13:141–146.Google Scholar
4. Jackson, M. L. 1964. Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice-Hall, Inc. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey. 498 p.Google Scholar
5. Miller, C. W., Demoranville, I. E. and Charig, A. J. 1967. Effect of water on the persistence of dichlobenil. Weed Res. 7:164–167.Google Scholar
6. Mortland, M. M. and Meggitt, W. F. 1966. Interaction Ethyl N,N-Di-n-propylthicarbamate (EPTC) with montmorillonite. J. Agr. Food Chem. 14:126–129.Google Scholar
7. Parochetti, J. V. and Warren, G. F. 1966. Vapor losses of IPC and CIPC. Weeds 14:281–285.Google Scholar
8. Pate, D. A., Funderburk, H. H. Jr., Davis, D. E. and Lawrence, J. M. 1964. Preliminary Studies on C14-labelled Dichlobenil. Proc. So. Weed Conf. 17:337.Google Scholar