Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:44:59.912Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Weed Communities in Semiarid Rainfed Croplands of Central Argentina: Comparison between Corn (Zea mays) and Soybean (Glycine max) Crops

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 January 2018

Ruth B. Rauber ,
Manuel R. Demaría ,
Esteban G. Jobbágy ,
Daniel N. Arroyo  and
Santiago L. Poggio
Ruth B. Rauber*
Affiliation:
Researcher CONICET, INTA EEA San Luis, Villa Mercedes, Rutas 7 y 8 (5730) San Luis, Argentina
Manuel R. Demaría
Affiliation:
Researcher, INTA EEA San Luis, Villa Mercedes, Rutas 7 y 8 (5730) San Luis, Argentina
Esteban G. Jobbágy
Affiliation:
Researcher, Grupo de Estudios Ambientales, IMASL–CONICET and Universidad Nacional de San Luis, Avenida Italia 1556 (5700) San Luis, Argentina
Daniel N. Arroyo
Affiliation:
Researcher, INTA EEA San Luis, Villa Mercedes, Rutas 7 y 8 (5730) San Luis, Argentina
Santiago L. Poggio
Affiliation:
Researcher and Professor, IFEVA/Universidad de Buenos Aires/CONICET, Facultad de Agronomía, Cátedra de Producción Vegetal, Avenida San Martín 4453 (C1417DSE) Buenos Aires, Argentina.
*
Author for correspondence: Ruth E. Raber, INTA EEA San Luis, Villa Mercedes, Rutas 7 y 8 (5730) San Luis, Argentina. (E-mail: rauber.ruth@inta.gob.ar)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The semiarid Espinal in central Argentina, being recently transformed from natural semiarid grasslands into agriculture, represents an interesting scenario to understand the early stages of weed community assembly and its relationship with crop identity and management. Our aim was to characterize the weed communities in corn (Zea mays L.) and soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.], the main crops of the Espinal region, under the dominant rainfed conditions. Weed surveys were carried out in 53 fields, and farmers were interviewed to collect information about crop management. Floristic composition was compared within and between crops by calculating the additive partition of the abundance-based Bray-Curtis dissimilarity. We compared the frequency and mean cover of functional groups between crops through generalized linear models. Finally, canonical correspondence analysis was carried out to analyze the associations between floristic composition and agronomic variables. Mean alpha and gamma diversity was greater in corn (10.0 and 80 species, respectively) than in soybean (7.6 and 46 species, respectively). Furthermore, species composition of weed communities was more similar among soybean fields than among either cornfields or fields of both crops. Hence, floristic differences between crops are potentially the result of different microenvironmental heterogeneity above- and belowground, with corn likely to be more permissive to weed establishment compared with soybean. The higher frequency of annual, dicotyledonous, and native species, and the high proportion of rare species, mostly native, suggest a strong legacy of the original vegetation that thrived in these recently cultivated systems. The functional composition was also affected by agronomic management, with sulfur, nitrogen, and grass herbicide application being the most important factors related to the floristic composition of weed communities. This early description can be used as a starting point for studies concerning trajectories, mechanisms, and processes of weed communities related to environment and management.

Keywords

John L. Lindquist, University of NebraskaAgricultural intensificationcrop dominanceenvironmental constraintsfunctional groupsglyphosate-tolerant soybeanno-tillageweed community
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 66 , Issue 3 , May 2018 , pp. 368 - 378
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, DL, del Águila, JA, Bernardon, AE (1970) Las formaciones vegetales de la provincia de San Luis. RIA (INTA) 7:153–183 Google Scholar
Ballaré, CL, Casal, JJ (2000) Light signals perceived by crop and weed plants. Field Crops Res 67:149–160 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baselga, A (2013) Separating the two components of abundance-based dissimilarity: balanced changes in abundance vs. abundance gradients. Methods Ecol Evol 4:552–557 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baselga, A, Orme, CDL (2012) betapart: an R package for the study of beta diversity. Meth Ecol Evol 3:808–812 Google Scholar
Benech-Arnold, RL, Sanchez, RA, Forcella, F, Kruk, BC, Ghersa, CM (2000) Environmental control of dormancy in weed seed banks in soil. Field Crops Res 67:105–122 Google Scholar
Booth, BD, Swanton, CJ (2002) Assembly theory applied to weed communities. Weed Sci 50:2–13 Google Scholar
Cabrera, AL (1976) Enciclopedia argentina de agricultura y jardinería. 2nd edn. Buenos Aires: Editorial Acme. 85 pGoogle Scholar
Cardina, J, Herms, CP, Doohan, DJ (2002) Crop rotation and tillage system effects on weed seedbanks. Weed Sci 50:448–460 Google Scholar
de Bello, F, Lavorel, S, Díaz, S, Harrington, R, Cornelissen, JHC, Bardgett, RD, Berg, M, Cipriotti, P, Feld, CK, Hering, D, Martins da Silva, P, Potts, SG, Sandin, L, Sousa, JP, Storkey, J, Wardle, DA, Harrison, PA (2010) Towards an assessment of multiple ecosystem processes and services via functional traits. Biodiversity Conserv 19:2873–2893 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de la Fuente, EB, Suárez, SA, Ghersa, CM (2006) Soybean weed community composition and richness between 1995 and 2003 in the Rolling Pampas (Argentina). Agric Ecosyst Environ 115:229–236 Google Scholar
de la Fuente, EB, Suárez, SA, Ghersa, CM, León, RJC (1999) Soybean weed communities: relationships with cultural history and crop yield. Agron J 91:234–241 Google Scholar
Demaría, MR, Aguado Suárez, I, Steinaker, DF (2008) Reemplazo y fragmentación de pastizales pampeanos semiáridos en San Luis, Argentina. Ecología Austral 18:55–70 Google Scholar
Derksen, DA, Anderson, RL, Blackshaw, RE, Maxwell, B (2002) Weed dynamics and management strategies for cropping systems in the northern Great Plains. Agron J 94:174–185 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Díaz, S, Cabido, M, Casanoves, F (1998) Plant functional traits and environmental filters at a regional scale. J Veg Sci 9:113–122 Google Scholar
Díaz-Zorita, M, Duarte, GA, Grove, JH (2002) A review of no-till systems and soil management for sustainable crop production in the subhumid and semiarid pampas of Argentina. Soil Till Res 65:1–18 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foley, JA, DeFries, R, Asner, GP, Barford, C, Bonan, G, Carpenter, SR, Chapin, FS, Coe, MT, Daily, GC, Gibbs, HK, Helkowski, JH, Holloway, T, Howard, EA, Kucharik, CJ, Monfreda, C, Patz, JA, Prentice, IC, Ramankutty, N, Snyder, PK (2005) Global consequences of land use. Science 309:570–574 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fried, G, Norton, LR, Reboud, X (2008) Environmental and management factors determining weed species composition and diversity in France. Agric Ecosyst Environ 128:68–76 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Froud-Williams, RJ (1986) Changes in weed flora with different tillage and agronomic management systems. Pages 213–236 in Altieri MA, Liebman M, eds. Weed Management in Agroecosystems: Ecological Approaches. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Google Scholar
Gao, Y, Duan, A, Qiu, X, Liu, Z, Sun, J, Zhang, J, Wang, H (2010) Distribution of roots and root length density in a maize/soybean strip intercropping system. Agric Water Manage 98:199–212 Google Scholar
Garay, JA, Colazo, JC (2015) El cultivo de maíz en San Luis. Buenos Aires, Argentina: INTA Ediciones Información Técnica No. 188Google Scholar
Ghersa, CM, de la Fuente, E, Suarez, S, León, RJC (2002) Woody species invasion in the Rolling Pampa grasslands, Argentina. Agr Ecosyst Environ 88:271–278 Google Scholar
Gitelson, AA, Peng, Yi, Huemmrich, KF (2014) Relationship between fraction of radiation absorbed by photosynthesizing maize and soybean canopies and NDVI from remotely sensed data taken at close range and from MODIS 250 m resolution data. Remote Sens Environ 147:108–120 Google Scholar
González-Roglich, M, Swenson, JJ, Villarreal, D, Jobbágy, EG, Jackson, RB (2015) Woody plant-cover dynamics in Argentine savannas from the 1880s to 2000s: the interplay of encroachment and agriculture conversion at varying scales. Ecosystems 18:481–492 Google Scholar
Hallgren, E, Palmer, MW, Milberg, P (1999) Data diving with cross-validation: an investigation of broad-scale gradients in Swedish weed communities. J Ecol 87:1037–1051 Google Scholar
Hyvönen, T, Holopainen, J, Tiainen, J (2005) Detecting the spatial component of variation in the weed community at the farm scale with variation partitioning by canonical correspondence analysis. Weed Res 1:48–56 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, VWL, Hutcheon, JA (1993) Less-intensive integrated farming systems for arable crop production and environmental protection. International Fertiliser Society Proceeding 346:1–32 Google Scholar
Liebman, M, Dyck, E (1993) Crop rotation and intercropping strategies for weed management. Ecol Appl 3:92–122 Google Scholar
Maddonni, GA, Otegui, ME, Cirilo, AG (2001) Plant population density, row spacing and hybrid effects on maize canopy architecture and light attenuation. Field Crop Res 71:183–193 Google Scholar
Martínez-Ghersa, MA, Ghersa, CM, Satorre, EH (2000) Coevolution of agricultural systems and their weed companions: implications for research. Field Crops Res 67:181–190 Google Scholar
Mas, MT, Verdu, AMC, Kruk, BC, De Abelleyra, D, Guglielmini, AC, Satorre, EH (2010) Weed communities of transgenic glyphosate-tolerant soyabean crops in ex-pasture land in the southern Mesopotamic Pampas of Argentina. Weed Res 50:320–330 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matson, PA, Parton, WJ, Power, AG, Swift, MJ (1997) Agricultural intensification and ecosystem properties. Science 277:504–509 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mendez, MJ, Buschiazzo, DE (2010) Wind erosion risk in agricultural soils under different tillage systems in the semiarid Pampas of Argentina. Soil Tillage Res 106:311–316 Google Scholar
Mhlanga, B, Chauhan, BS, Thierfelder, C (2016) Weed management in maize using crop competition: a review. Crop Prot 88:28–36 Google Scholar
Mueller-Dombois, D, Ellenberg, H (1974) Aims and Methods of Vegetation Ecology. New York: Wiley. 574 pGoogle Scholar
Légère, A, Samson, N (1999) Relative influence of crop rotation, tillage, and weed management on weed associations in spring barley cropping systems. Weed Sci 47:112–122 Google Scholar
Lemes, JL, Quiroga, A, Ventura, JL (1993) El hábito de crecimiento de Cenchrus incertus (C. pauciflorus) (Poaceae) en la provincia de La Pampa. Multequina 2:183–194 Google Scholar
Oksanen, J, Blanchet, FG, Kindt, R, Legendre, P, Minchin, PR, O’Hara, RB, Simpson, GL, Solymos, P, Stevens, MHH, Wagner, H. (2015) vegan: Community Ecology Package. R Package v. 2.2-1. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan. Accessed February 2017Google Scholar
Palmer, MW, Maurer, TA (1997) Does diversity beget diversity? A case of crops and weeds. J Veg Sci 8:235–240 Google Scholar
Peña Zubiate, CA, Anderson, DL, Demmi, MA, Saenz, JL, d’Hiriart, A (1998) Carta de suelos y vegetación de la provincia de San Luis. San Luis: Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadería, Pesca y Alimentación, INTA y Gobierno de la provincia de San Luis. 115 pGoogle Scholar
Peña Zubiate, CA, d’Hiriart, A (2000) Carta de suelos de la República Argentina Hoja Villa Mercedes, Provincia de San Luis. San Luis: INTA y Gobierno de la provincia de San Luis Google Scholar
Peña Zubiate, CA, d’Hiriart, A (2007) Carta de suelos de la República Argentina Hoja San Luis, Provincia de San Luis. San Luis: INTA y Gobierno de la provincia de San Luis. 148 ppGoogle Scholar
Pengelly, BC, Blamey, FPC, Muchow, RC (1999) Radiation interception and the accumulation of biomass and nitrogen by soybean and three tropical annual forage legumes. Field Crops Res 63:99–112 Google Scholar
Penning de Vries, FWT, Van Laar, HH, Chardon, MCM (1983) Flioenergetics of growth of seeds, fruits and storage organs. Pages 37–59 in Proceedings of a Symposium on Potential Productivity of Field Crops under Different Environments. Los Banos, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute Google Scholar
Perelman, SB, León, RJC, Oesterheld, M (2001) Cross-scale vegetation patterns of Flooding Pampa grasslands. J Ecol 89:562–577 Google Scholar
Poggio, SL (2012) Cambios florísticos en comunidades de malezas: un marco conceptual basado en reglas de ensamblaje. Ecología Austral 22:150–158 Google Scholar
Poggio, SL, Chaneton, EJ, Ghersa, CM (2013) The arable plant diversity of intensively managed farmland: effects of field position and crop type at local and landscape scales. Agr Ecosyst Env 166:55–64 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poggio, SL, Ghersa, CM (2011) Species richness and evenness as a function of biomass in arable plant communities. Weed Res 51:241–249 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poggio, SL, Satorre, EH, de la Fuente, EB (2004) Structure of weed communities occurring in pea and wheat crops in the Rolling Pampa (Argentina). Agr Ecosyst Env 103:225–235 Google Scholar
Pyšek, P, Lepš, J (1991) Response of a weed community to nitrogen fertilization: a multivariate analysis. J Veg Sci 2:237–244 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rajcan, I, Swanton, CJ (2001) Understanding maize–weed competition: resource competition, light quality and the whole plant. Field Crops Res 71:139–150 Google Scholar
R Development Core Team (2014) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org. Accessed February 2017Google Scholar
Santoni, CS, Jobbágy, EG, Contreras, S (2010) Vadose zone transport in dry forests of central Argentina: role of land use. Water Resour Res 46. doi: 10.1029/2009WR008784 Google Scholar
Swanton, CJ, Clements, DR, Derksen, DA (1993) Weed succession under conservation tillage: a hierarchical framework for research and management. Weed Technol 7:286–297 Google Scholar
Tilman, D, Balzer, C, Hill, J, Befort, B (2011) Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:20260–20264 Google Scholar
Viglizzo, EF, Frank, FC (2006) Ecological interactions, feedbacks, thresholds and collapses in the Argentine Pampas in response to climate and farming during the last century. Quaternary Int 158:122–126 Google Scholar
Viglizzo, EF, Frank, FC, Carreño, LV, Jobbágy, EG, Pereyra, H, Clatt, J, Pincén, D, Ricard, MF (2011) Ecological and environmental footprint of 50 years of agricultural expansion in Argentina. Global Change Biol 17:959–973 Google Scholar
Zak, MR, Cabido, MR, Cáceres, D, Diaz, S (2008) What drives accelerated land cover change in central Argentina? Synergistic consequences of climatic, socioeconomic and technological factors. Environ Manag 42:181–189 Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Rauber et al. supplementary material

Appendix A-B

Download Rauber et al. supplementary material(File)
File 136.1 KB