Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T11:04:52.632Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Weed Control Programs for Minimum-Tillage Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Steven M. Brown
Affiliation:
Agron. and Soils Dep., Alabama Agric. Exp. Stn., Auburn Univ., AL 36849
Ted Whitwell
Affiliation:
Agron. and Soils Dep., Alabama Agric. Exp. Stn., Auburn Univ., AL 36849

Abstract

Eleven herbicide systems were evaluated from 1981 to 1983 for cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L. ‘Stoneville 825’) planted no-till directly into cover crops or winter fallow and for cotton planted following conventional tillage. Herbicide systems consisted of paraquat (1,1’-dimethyl-4,4’-bipyridinium ion) or glyphosate [N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine] and/or residual herbicides applied prior to crop emergence. Some systems also included early postemergence or postemergence-directed applications. Cover crops were crimson clover (Trifolium incarnatum L.), hairy vetch (Vicia villosa Roth.), and rye (Secale cereale L.). Soil cover in fallow treatments was comprised mainly of cotton stalk residue. Conventional tillage and seedbed preparation included fall moldboard plowing and spring disking/smoothing. Treatments were maintained in the same site each year. Order of cover crop susceptibility to herbicides applied prior to crop emergence was rye>clover>vetch. In 1981, all residual treatments except cyanazine {2-[[4-chloro-6-(ethylamino)-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl]amino]-2-methylpropanenitrile} alone prior to crop emergence provided better than 80% control of annual weeds. In subsequent years only systems that included applications prior to crop emergence and postemergence-directed herbicides provided acceptable control. From 1981 to 1983, annual grasses increased 20- to 100-fold for systems in which control was poor. Weed control was generally superior in conventional tillage. Vetch adversely affected cotton stands in all 3 yr. Also, in 1982, reduced cotton stands resulted from cyanazine treatments applied prior to crop emergence in clover, vetch, and fallow. Cotton yields were affected by cover dessication, annual weed control, and cotton stands. Buildup of annual weeds reduced yields to near zero for some treatments in 1983.

Type
Weed Control and Herbicide Technology
Copyright
Copyright © 1985 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Buchanan, G. A. and Burns, E. R. 1980. Influence of weed competition on cotton. Weed Sci. 18:149154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Dumas, W. T. 1980. Minimum tillage controlled traffic systems for double cropping of cotton and crimson clover. Ala. Agric. Exp. Stn., Highlights of Agric. Res. 27(3):5.Google Scholar
3. Kapusta, G. 1979. Seedbed tillage and herbicide influence on soybean (Glyine max) weed control and yield. Weed Sci. 27:520526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Robison, L. R. and Wittmuss, H. D. 1973. Evaluation of herbicides for use in zero and minimized till corn and sorghum. Agron. J. 65:286293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Triplett, G. B. Jr. 1966. Herbicide systems for no-tillage corn (Zea mays L.) following sod. 1966. Agron. J. 58:157159.Google Scholar
6. Triplett, G. B. Jr. and Lytle, G. D. 1972. Control and ecology of weeds in continuous corn without tillage. Weed Sci. 20:453457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Whitwell, T., Brown, S. M., and Chandler, J. M. 1982. Report of 1981 cotton weed loss committee. Proc. 1982 Beltwide Cotton Prod. Res. Conf. Pages 241250.Google Scholar