Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:18:49.344Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Weed management with CGA-362622 in transgenic and nontransgenic cotton

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Dunk Porterfield ,
John W. Wilcut ,
Jerry W. Wells  and
Scott B. Clewis
Dunk Porterfield
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
Jerry W. Wells
Affiliation:
Syngenta Crop Protection, P.O. Box 18300, Greensboro, NC 27419
Scott B. Clewis
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field studies conducted at three locations in North Carolina in 1998 and 1999 evaluated crop tolerance, weed control, and yield with CGA-362622 alone and in combination with various weed management systems in transgenic and nontransgenic cotton systems. The herbicide systems used bromoxynil, CGA-362622, glyphosate, and pyrithiobac applied alone early postemergence (EPOST) or mixtures of CGA-362622 plus bromoxynil, glyphosate, or pyrithiobac applied EPOST. Trifluralin preplant incorporated followed by (fb) fluometuron preemergence (PRE) alone or fb a late POST–directed (LAYBY) treatment of prometryn plus MSMA controlled all the weed species present less than 90%. Herbicide systems that included soil-applied and LAYBY herbicides plus glyphosate EPOST or mixtures of CGA-362622 EPOST plus bromoxynil, glyphosate, or pyrithiobac controlled broadleaf signalgrass, entireleaf morningglory, large crabgrass, Palmer amaranth, prickly sida, sicklepod, and smooth pigweed at least 90%. Only cotton treated with these herbicide systems yielded equivalent to the weed-free check for each cultivar. Bromoxynil systems did not control Palmer amaranth and sicklepod, pyrithiobac systems did not control sicklepod, and CGA-362622 systems did not control prickly sida.

Keywords

BromoxynilCGA-362622, N-[(4,6-dimethoxy-2-pyrimidinyl) carbamoyl]-3-(2,2,2-trifluoroethoxy)-pyridin-2-sulfonamide sodium saltfluometuronglyphosateMSMAprometrynpyrithiobactrifluralinbroadleaf signalgrass, Brachiaria platyphylla (Griseb.) Nash BRAPPentireleaf morningglory, Ipomoea hederacea var. integriuscula Gray IPOHGlarge crabgrass, Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop. DIGSAPalmer amaranth, Amaranthus palmeri S. Wats. AMAPAprickly sida, Sida spinosa L. SIDSPsicklepod, Senna obtusifolia (L.) Irwin and Barneby CASOBsmooth pigweed, Amaranthus hybridus L. AMACHcotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. ‘Paymaster 1220 RR’, ‘Stoneville BXN 47’, ‘Stoneville 474’Herbicide-resistant crops
Type
Weed Management
Information
Weed Science , Volume 51 , Issue 6 , December 2003 , pp. 1002 - 1009
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous. 1999. Roundup Ultra supplemental label 21137X-20. St. Louis, MO: Monsanto.Google Scholar
Askew, S. D., Bailey, W. A., Scott, G. H., and Wilcut, J. W. 2002. Economic assessment of weed management for transgenic and non-transgenic cotton in tilled and non-tilled environments. Weed Sci 50:512–520.Google Scholar
Askew, S. D. and Wilcut, J. W. 1999. Cost and weed management with herbicide programs in glyphosate-resistant cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Technol 13:308–313.Google Scholar
Askew, S. D. and Wilcut, J. W. 2002. Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of foliar-applied CGA 362622 in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum), peanut (Arachis hypogaea), and selected weeds. Weed Sci 50:293–298.Google Scholar
Bloodworth, K. M., Reynolds, D. B., Holloway, J. C., and Cobill, R. M. 2000. Cotton weed control in Mississippi with CGA-362622. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc 53:28.Google Scholar
Bowman, D. T. 1999. Variety selection. Pages 24–42 in Edmisten, K. L. ed. 1999 Cotton Information. Publication AG-417. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina Cooperation Extension Service.Google Scholar
Buchanan, G. A. 1992. Trends in weed control methods. Pages 47–72 in McWhorter, C. G. and Abernathy, J. R. eds. Weeds of Cotton: Characterization and Control. Memphis, TN: The Cotton Foundation.Google Scholar
Burke, I. C., Wilcut, J. W., and Porterfield, D. 2002. CGA 362622 antagonizes annual grass control with clethodim. Weed Technol 16:749–754.Google Scholar
Crooks, H. L., York, A. C., and Culpepper, A. S. 2001. Interactions of CGA 362622 and graminicides on annual grasses in cotton. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr 41:59.Google Scholar
Crowley, R. H., Teem, D. H., Buchanan, G. A., and Hoveland, C. S. 1979. Responses of Ipomoea spp. and Cassia spp. to preemergence herbicides. Weed Sci 27:531–535.Google Scholar
Culpepper, A. S. and York, A. C. 1997. Weed management in no-tillage bromoxynil-tolerant cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Technol 11:335–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culpepper, A. S. and York, A. C. 1999. Weed management and net returns with transgenic, herbicide-resistant, and nontransgenic cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Technol 13:411–420.Google Scholar
Dowler, C. C. 1998. Weed survey—southern states. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc 51:299–322.Google Scholar
Edmisten, K. 2000. Planting decisions. Pages 20–34 in Edmisten, K. L. ed. 2000 Cotton Information. Publication AG-417. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina Cooperation Extension Service.Google Scholar
Ferreira, K. L. and Coble, H. D. 1994. Effect of DPX-PE350 on the efficacy of graminicides. Weed Sci 42:222–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frans, R. E., Talbert, R., Marx, D., and Crowley, H. 1986. Experimental design and techniques for measuring and analyzing plant responses to weed control practices. Pages 37–38 in Camper, N. D., ed. Research Methods in Weed Science. 3rd ed. Champaign, IL: Southern Weed Science Society.Google Scholar
Gimenez, A., York, A. C., and Wilcut, J. W. 1998. Annual grass control with glyphosate mixtures with imazethapyr, bentazon, fomesafen, and 2,4-DB. Weed Technol 12:134–136.Google Scholar
Guthrie, D. S. and York, A. C. 1989. Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) development and yield following fluometuron postemergence applied. Weed Technol 3:501–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, M. A., Hayes, R. M., and Mueller, T. C. 1996. Environment affects cotton and velvetleaf response to pyrithiobac. Weed Sci 44:241–247.Google Scholar
Holloway, J. C. Jr., Wells, J. W., and Hudetz, M. et al. 2000. CGA-362622 application timing, rates, and weed spectrum in cotton. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc 53:240.Google Scholar
Hudetz, M., Foery, W., Wells, J., and Soares, J. E. 2000. CGA-362622, a new low rate Novartis post-emergent herbicide for cotton and sugarcane. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc 53:163–166.Google Scholar
Jennings, K. M., Culpepper, A. S., and York, A. C. 1999. Cotton response to temperature and pyrithiobac. J. Cotton Sci 3:132–138.Google Scholar
Jones, M. A. and Snipes, C. E. 1999. Tolerance of transgenic cotton to topical application of glyphosate. J. Cotton Sci 3:19–26.Google Scholar
Jordan, D., McClelland, M., Kendig, A., and Frans, R. 1997a. Monosodium methanerarsonate influence on broadleaf weed control with selected postemergence-directed cotton herbicides. J. Cotton Sci 1:72–75.Google Scholar
Jordan, D. L., Frans, R. E., and McClelland, M. R. 1993a. Total postemergence herbicide programs in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) with sethoxydim and DPX-PE350. Weed Technol 7:196–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, D. L., Frans, R. E., and McClelland, M. R. 1993b. Influence of application rate and timing on efficacy of DPX-PE350 applied postemergence. Weed Technol 7:216–219.Google Scholar
Jordan, D. L., York, A. C., Griffin, J. L., Clay, P. A., Vidrine, P. R., and Reynolds, D. B. 1997b. Influence of application variables on efficacy of glyphosate. Weed Technol 11:354–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIntosh, M. S. 1983. Analysis of combined experiments. Agron. J 75:153–155.Google Scholar
Monks, C. D., Patterson, M. G., Wilcut, J. W., and Delaney, D. 1999. Effect of pyrithiobac, MSMA, and DSMA on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) growth and weed control. Weed Technol 13:6–11.Google Scholar
Paulsgrove, M. D. and Wilcut, J. W. 1999. Weed management in bromoxynil-resistant Gossypium hirsutum . Weed Sci 47:596–601.Google Scholar
Paulsgrove, M. D. and Wilcut, J. W. 2001. Weed management with pyrithiobac preemergence in bromoxynil-resistant cotton. Weed Sci 49:567–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pline, W. A., Edmisten, K. L., Oliver, T., Wilcut, J. W., Wells, R., and Allen, N. 2002a. Use of digital image analysis, viability stains, and germination assays to estimate conventional and glyphosate-resistant cotton pollen viability. Crop Sci 42:2193–2200.Google Scholar
Pline, W. A., Edmisten, K. L., Wilcut, J. W., Wells, R., and Thomas, J. 2003. Glyphosate-induced reductions in pollen viability and seed set in glyphosate-resistant cotton and attempted remediation by gibberellic acid (GA3). Weed Sci 51:19–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pline, W. A., Price, A. J., Wilcut, J. W., Edmisten, K. L., and Wells, R. 2001. Absorption and translocation of glyphosate in glyphosate-resistant cotton as influenced by application method and growth stage. Weed Sci 49:460–467.Google Scholar
Pline, W. A., Viator, R., Wilcut, J. W., Edmisten, K. L., Thomas, J., and Wells, R. 2002b. Reproductive abnormalities in glyphosate-resistant cotton due to lower CP4-EPSPS levels in male reproductive tissue. Weed Sci 50:438–447.Google Scholar
Pline, W. A., Wilcut, J. W., Duke, S. O., Edmisten, K. L., and Wells, R. 2002c. Tolerance and accumulation of shikimic acid in response to glyphosate applications in glyphosate-resistant and conventional cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). J. Agric. Food Chem 50:506–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porterfield, D., Wilcut, J. W., and Askew, S. D. 2002a. Weed management with CGA-362622, fluometuron, and prometryn in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Sci 50:438–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porterfield, D., Wilcut, J. W., Clewis, S. B., and Edmisten, K. L. 2002b. Weed-free yield response of seven cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) cultivars to CGA-362622 postemergence. Weed Technol 16:180–183.Google Scholar
Scott, G. H., Askew, S. D., Bennett, A. C., and Wilcut, J. W. 2001. Economic evaluation of HADSS™ computer program for weed management in nontransgenic and transgenic cotton. Weed Sci 49:549–557.Google Scholar
Scott, G. H., Askew, S. D., and Wilcut, J. W. 2002. Glyphosate systems for weed control in glyphosate-tolerant cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Technol 16:191–198.Google Scholar
Snipes, C. E. and Allen, R. L. 1996. Interaction of graminicides applied in combination with pyrithiobac. Weed Technol 10:889–892.Google Scholar
Snipes, C. E. and Mueller, T. C. 1992a. Influence of fluometuron and MSMA on cotton yield and fruiting characteristics. Weed Sci 42:210–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snipes, C. E. and Mueller, T. C. 1992b. Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) yield response to mechanical and chemical weed control systems. Weed Sci 40:219–254.Google Scholar
Troxler, S. C., Burke, I. C., Wilcut, J. W., and Smith, W. D. 2003. Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of foliar applied CGA-362622 in purple and yellow nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus and C. esculentus). Weed Sci 51:13–18.Google Scholar
Wilcut, J. W. 1998. Influence of pyrithiobac sodium on purple (Cyperus rotundus) and yellow nutsedge (C. esculentus). Weed Sci 46:111–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilcut, J. W. and Hinton, J. D. 1997. Staple and MSMA systems for weed control in cotton. Proc. Beltwide Cotton Conf 2:771.Google Scholar
Wilcut, J. W., Jordan, D. L., Vencill, W. K., and Richburg, J. S. III. 1997. Weed management in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) with soil-applied and post-directed herbicides. Weed Technol 11:221–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilcut, J. W., Patterson, M. G., Wehjte, G. R., and Whitwell, T. 1988. Efficacy and economics of pendimethalin herbicide combinations for weed control in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Appl. Agric. Res 3:203–208.Google Scholar
Wilcut, J. W., York, A. C., and Jordan, D. L. 1995. Weed management systems for oil seed crops. Pages 343–400 in Smith, A. E. ed. Handbook of Weed Management Systems. New York: Marcel-Dekker.Google Scholar
Wood, M. L., Murray, D. S., Westerman, R. B., Verhalen, L. M., and Claypool, P. L. 1999. Full-season interference of Ipomoea hederacea with Gossypium hirsutum . Weed Sci 47:693–696.Google Scholar
York, A. C. and Culpepper, A. S. 2001. Weed management in cotton. Pages 73–119 in Edmisten, K. L. ed. 2001 Cotton Information. Publication AG-417. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina Cooperation Extension Service.Google Scholar