Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:46:53.498Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Weeds in New Seedings of Alfalfa (Medicago sativa) for Seed Production: Competition and Control

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

J. H. Dawson
Affiliation:
Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric., Irrigated Agric. Res. and Ext. Center, Prosser, WA 99350
C. M. Rincker
Affiliation:
Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric., Irrigated Agric. Res. and Ext. Center, Prosser, WA 99350

Abstract

Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L. ‘Vernal′) seeded in April in rows 55 cm apart and kept free of weeds produced 820 kg/ha of seed during the year of seeding. Competition from a dense popualtion (40 plants/m of row) of mixed species of annual weeds reduced the seed yield to 45 kg/ha. Competition from a dense population (55 plants/m of row) of broadleaf weeds, a light population (4 plants/m of row) of broadleaf weeds, or a heavy population (75 culms/m of row) of barnyardgrass [Echinochloa crusgalli (L.) Beauv.] reduced yields to 80, 310, and 160 kg/ha, respectively. A weed management system, consisting of EPTC (S-ethyl dipropylthiocarbamate) or profluralin [N-(cyclopropylmethyl)-α,α,α-trifluoro-2,6-dinitro-N-propyl-p-toluidine] applied at or before planting, 2,4-DB [4-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy) butyric acid] applied postemergence, trifluralin (α,α,α- trifluoro-2,6-dinitro-N,N-dipropyl-p-toluidine) incorporated with the soil when the alfalfa was 20 cm tall, interrow tillage, and a modest input of hand labor brought the crop to harvest free of weeds, and the yields of alfalfa seed were similar to those from plots kept weed-free by hand labor only. When weeds within the rows were controlled by hand labor only, labor inputs as great as 930 h/ha were required to bring the crop to harvest free of weeds, whereas labor inputs of 7 to 17 h/ha removed all surviving weeds when effective weed management systems had been applied.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1982 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Dawson, J. H. 1965. Competition between irrigated sugar beets and annual weeds. Weeds 13:245249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Dawson, J. H. 1974. Full-season weed control in sugarbeets. Weed Sci. 22:330335.Google Scholar
3. Dawson, J. H. and Harvey, R. G. 1981. Management systems for weeds in alfalfa. In Pimentel, D., ed. Handbook of Pest Management, Vol. III, CRC Press, Inc. (In press).Google Scholar
4. Pedersen, M. W., Bohart, G. E., Levin, M. D., Nye, W. P., Taylor, S. A., and Haddock, J. L. 1959. Cultural practices for alfalfa seed production. Utah Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. 408. 31 pp.Google Scholar
5. Peters, E. J. and Peters, R. A. 1972. Weeds and weed control. Pages 555573 in Hansen, C. H., ed. Alfalfa Science and Technology. Am. Soc. Agron. Monograph 15.Google Scholar
6. Rincker, C. M. 1976. Alfalfa seed yields from seeded rows vs. spaced transplants. Crop Sci. 16:268270.Google Scholar
7. Rincker, C. M. 1979. Alfalfa seed production in the Pacific Northwest. Proc. Twenty-fifth Annual Farm Seed Conf. of the Am. Seed Trade Assn. pp. 1319.Google Scholar
8. Rincker, C. M. and Morrison, K. J. 1970. Seed yield potential of some foreign alfalfa and clover varieties in Washington. Wash. Agric. Exp. Stn. Circ. 528. 7 pp.Google Scholar
9. Stephen, W. P. 1959. Maintaining alkali bees for alfalfa seed production. Oregon Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. 568. 23 pp.Google Scholar