Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T06:35:43.607Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Wild radish–amended soil effects on yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) interference with tomato and bell pepper

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Jason K. Norsworthy  and
John T. Meehan IV
John T. Meehan IV
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Soils, and Plant Sciences, Clemson University, 277 Poole Agricultural Center, Clemson, SC 29634
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Greenhouse studies were conducted to evaluate the influence of wild radish–amended soil on tomato, bell pepper, and yellow nutsedge growth. In addition, yellow nutsedge interference with tomato and bell pepper was evaluated with and without the wild radish amendment. Leaf margins of tomato and bell pepper plants were necrotic for approximately 2 wk after transplanting into soil amended with 1% (wt/wt) wild radish biomass. Injury to both crops was transient, but bell pepper biomass through 9 wk after transplanting was negatively affected, whereas tomato was not. In a replacement series study, tomato was more competitive than yellow nutsedge in nonamended soil and the competitiveness of tomato further increased at the expense of reduced yellow nutsedge growth in wild radish–amended soil. Bell pepper was less competitive than yellow nutsedge in nonamended soil, but in wild radish–amended soil, bell pepper held a competitive advantage over yellow nutsedge. In addition, yellow nutsedge tuber production was reduced as much as 88% when soil was amended with wild radish, and tuber weight in nonamended soil was 0.32 g tuber−1 compared with 0.05 g tuber−1 in wild radish–amended soil. This research shows that competitiveness of tomato and bell pepper is increased over yellow nutsedge when soil is amended with wild radish, in addition to reducing yellow nutsedge tuber production and size.

Keywords

Wild radish, Raphanus raphanistrum L. RAPRAyellow nutsedge, Cyperus esculentus L. CYPESbell pepper, Capsicum annuum ‘SXP 0990’tomato, Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. ‘Sunny’Allelopathyintegrated weed managementplant competitionreplacement seriesweed–crop interference
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 53 , Issue 1 , February 2005 , pp. 77 - 83
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Blackshaw, R. E., Lemerle, D., Mailer, R., and Young, K. R. 2002. Influence of wild radish on yield and quality of canola. Weed Sci 50:344–349.Google Scholar
Borek, V., Morra, M. J., Brown, P. D., and McCaffrey, J. P. 1995. Transformation of the glucosinolate-derived allelochemicals allyl isothiocyanate and allyl nitrile in soil. J. Agric. Food Chem 43:1935–1940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boydston, R. A. and Hang, A. 1995. Rapeseed (Brassica napus) green manure crop suppresses weeds in potato (Solanum tuberosum). Weed Technol 9:669–675.Google Scholar
Brown, P. D. and Morra, M. J. 1996. Hydrolysis products of glucosinolates in Brassica napus tissues as inhibitors of seed germination. Plant. Soil 181:307–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, P. D., Morra, M. J., McCaffrey, J. P., Auld, D. L., and Williams, L. III. 1991. Allelochemicals produced during glucosinolate degradation in soil. J. Chem. Ecol 17:2021–2034.Google Scholar
Chew, F. S. 1988. Biological effects of glucosinolates. Pages 155–181 in Cutler, H. G. ed. Biologically Active Natural Products: Potential Use in Agriculture. ACS Symposium Ser. 380. Washington, D.C.: American Chemical Society.Google Scholar
Choesin, D. N. and Boerner, R. E. J. 1991. Allyl isothiocyanate release and the allelopathic potential of Brassica napus (Brassicacceae). Am. J. Bot 78:1083–1090.Google Scholar
Cole, R. A. 1976. Isothiocyanates, nitriles, and thiocyanates as products of autolysis of glucosinolates in Cruciferae. Phytochemistry 15:759–762.Google Scholar
Cousens, R. and O'Neill, M. 1993. Density dependence of replacement series experiments. Oikos 66:347–352.Google Scholar
Davies, R. T. Jr., Olalde-Portugal, V., Alvarado, M. J., Escamilla, H. M., Ferrera-Cerrato, R. C., and Espinosa, J. I. 2000. Alleviating phosphorus stress of chile ancho pepper (Capsicum annuum L. ‘San Luis’) by arbuscular mycorrhizal inoculation. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol 75:655–661.Google Scholar
Dell'Amico, J., Torrecillas, A., Rodriguez, P., Morte, A., and Sanchez-Blanco, M. J. 2002. Responses of tomato plants associated with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus clarum during drought and recovery. J. Agric. Sci 138:387–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Draper, W. M. and Wakeham, D. E. 1993. Rate constants for metam-sodium cleavage and photodecomposition in water. J. Agric. Food Chem 41:1129–1133.Google Scholar
Drost, D. C. and Doll, J. D. 1980. The allelopathic effect of yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) on corn (Zea mays) and soybean (Glycine max). Weed Sci 28:229–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleeson, A. C. and McGilchrist, C. A. 1980. Mixture diallel experiments with unequal proportions of genotypes. J. Agric. Sci 95:525–532.Google Scholar
Gomez, K. A. and Gomez, A. A. 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. New York: J. Wiley. Pp. 7–83.Google Scholar
Harper, J. L. 1977. The Population Biology of Plants. London: Academic. Pp. 237–276.Google Scholar
Hoffman, M. L. and Buhler, D. D. 2002. Utilizing Sorghum as a functional model of crop-weed competition. I. Establishing a competitive hierarchy. Weed Sci 50:466–472.Google Scholar
Keeley, P. E. and Thullen, R. J. 1974. Yellow nutsedge control with soil-incorporated herbicides. Weed Sci 22:378–383.Google Scholar
Krishnan, G., Houlshouser, D. H., and Nissen, S. J. 1998. Weed control in soybean (Glycine max) with green manure crops. Weed Technol 12:97–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorenzi, H. J. and Jeffery, L. S. 1987. Weeds of the United States and Their Control. New York: Van Norstrand Reinhold. Pp. 64–282.Google Scholar
Morales-Payan, J. P., Stall, W. M., Shilling, D. G., Charuddattan, R., Dusky, J. A., and Bewick, T. A. 2003. Above- and belowground interference of purple and yellow nutsedge (Cyperus spp.) with tomato. Weed Sci 51:181–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Motis, T. N., Locascio, S. J., Gilreath, J. P., and Stall, W. M. 2003. Season-long interference of yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) with polyethylene-mulched bell pepper (Capsicum annuum). Weed Technol 17:543–549.Google Scholar
Norsworthy, J. K. 2003. Allelopathic potential of wild radish (Raphanus raphanistrum). Weed Technol 17:307–313.Google Scholar
Petersen, J., Belz, R., Walker, F., and Hurle, K. 2001. Weed suppression by release of isothiocyanates from turnip-rape mulch. Agron. J 93:37–43.Google Scholar
Radosevich, S. R. 1987. Methods to study interactions among crops and weeds. Weed Technol 1:190–197.Google Scholar
Radosevich, S. R. and Holt, J. S. 1984. Plant growth and interference. Pages 93–135 in Weed Ecology: Implications for Vegetation Management. New York: J. Wiley.Google Scholar
Reddy, K. N. and Bendixen, L. E. 1989. Toxicity, absorption, and translocation of soil-applied chlorimuron in yellow and purple nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus and C. rontundus). Weed Sci 37:147–151.Google Scholar
Santos, B. M., Bewick, T. A., Stall, W. M., and Shilling, D. G. 1997. Competitive interactions of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) and nutsedge (Cyperus spp). Weed Sci 45:229–233.Google Scholar
Schreiner, R. P. and Koide, R. T. 1993. Antifungal compounds from the roots of mycotrophic and non-mycotrophic plant species. New Phytol 123:99–105.Google Scholar
Schroeder, J. 1989. Wild radish (Raphanus raphanistrum) control in soft red winter wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Sci 37:112–116.Google Scholar
Stall, W. M. and Morales-Payan, J. P. 2003. The Critical Period of Nutsedge Interference in Tomato. http://www.imok.ufl.edu/liv/groups/IPM/weed_con/nutsedge.htm.Google Scholar
Stoller, E. W., Nema, D. P., and Bhan, V. M. 1972. Yellow nutsedge tuber germination and seedling development. Weed Sci 20:93–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taiz, L. and Zeiger, E. 2002. Plant Physiology. 3rd ed. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates. Pp. 292–293.Google Scholar
[USDA] U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service. 2003. Agricultural Chemical Usage: 2002 Vegetable Summary. www.usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/.Google Scholar
Vierheilig, H., Bennett, R., Kiddle, G., Kaldorf, M., and Ludwig-Muller, J. 2000. Differences in glucosinolate patterns and arbuscular mycorrhizal status of glucosinolate-containing plant species. New Phytol 146:343–352.Google Scholar
Webster, T. M. 2002. Weed survey—southern states. Proc. South. Weed. Sci. Soc 55:237–254.Google Scholar