Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T11:17:45.010Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Winter Preference for Weed Seed and Waste Grain by Native Mice in Row-Crop Agriculture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2017

Jacob L. Berl ,
Hunter A. Johnstone ,
Jonathan Y. Wu ,
Elizabeth A. Flaherty  and
Robert K. Swihart
Jacob L. Berl*
Affiliation:
Graduate Student, Undergraduate Student, Undergraduate Student, Assistant Professor, and Professor, Department of Forestry and Natural Resources, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
Hunter A. Johnstone
Affiliation:
Graduate Student, Undergraduate Student, Undergraduate Student, Assistant Professor, and Professor, Department of Forestry and Natural Resources, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
Jonathan Y. Wu
Affiliation:
Graduate Student, Undergraduate Student, Undergraduate Student, Assistant Professor, and Professor, Department of Forestry and Natural Resources, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
Elizabeth A. Flaherty
Affiliation:
Graduate Student, Undergraduate Student, Undergraduate Student, Assistant Professor, and Professor, Department of Forestry and Natural Resources, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
Robert K. Swihart
Affiliation:
Graduate Student, Undergraduate Student, Undergraduate Student, Assistant Professor, and Professor, Department of Forestry and Natural Resources, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
*
* Corresponding author’s E-mail: jberl@purdue.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Consumption of weed seeds and waste grains by seed predators is an important ecosystem service that helps to regulate weed and volunteer crop populations in many agricultural systems. The prairie deer mouse is found in a variety of sparsely vegetated habitats throughout the central United States and is the dominant vertebrate seed predator in row-crop fields (corn and soybean) in this region. Evaluating the preferences of prairie deer mice for common agricultural weed seeds and waste grain is important to understand the potential ability of native mice to regulate volunteer crops and weed populations. We evaluated winter seed preference of deer mice using cafeteria-style feeding trials presented within row-crop fields in central Indiana and used compositional analysis to compare proportional consumption of seeds from five common agricultural weeds (common ragweed, common cocklebur, common lambsquarters, velvetleaf, and giant foxtail) and two grains (corn and soybean) during overnight feeding trials. Prairie deer mice significantly preferred corn to all other available seed types. Ragweed and soybean were also readily consumed and were preferred over seeds other than corn. Giant foxtail was intermediately preferred. Our results show that prairie deer mice have clear preferences for certain seeds commonly available in row-crop fields; mice likely contribute to reduction of waste grain and some weed seed populations.

Keywords

Common cocklebur, Xanthium strumarium Lcommon ragweed, Ambrosia artemisiifolia Lcommon lambsquarters, Chenopodium album Lgiant foxtail, Setaria faberi Herrmvelvetleaf, Abutilon theophrasti Medikcorn, Zea mays Lsoybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr.Biological controlPeromyscus maniculatus bairdiiprairie deer micerow cropsseed predationseed preferencewaste grainweed seed.
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 65 , Issue 3 , May 2017 , pp. 406 - 412
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Associate Editor for this paper: Adam Davis, USDA–ARS.

References

Literature Cited

Aebiescher, NJ, Robertson, PA, Kenward, RE (1993) Compositional analysis of habitat use from animal radio-tracking data. Ecology 74:1313–1325 Google Scholar
Bingham, RL, Brennan, LA (2004) Comparison of type I error rates for statistical analyses of resource selection. J Wildl Manage 68:206–212 Google Scholar
Blubaugh, CK, Kaplan, I (2016) Invertebrate seed predators reduce weed emergence following seed rain. Weed Sci 64:80–86 Google Scholar
Blythe, RM, Lichti, NI, Smyser, TJ, Swihart, RK (2015) Selection, caching, and consumption of hardwood seeds by forest rodents: implications for restoration of American chestnut. Restor Ecol 23:473–481 Google Scholar
Booman, GC, Laterra, P, Comparatore, V, Murillo, N (2009) Post-dispersal predation of weed seeds by small vertebrates: interactive influences of neighbor land use and local environment. Agric Ecosyst Environ 129:277–285 Google Scholar
Brown, JS, Kotler, BP (2004) Hazardous duty pay and the foraging cost of predation. Ecol Lett 7:999–1094 Google Scholar
Brust, GE, House, GJ (1988) Weed seed destruction by arthropods and rodents in low-input soybean agroecosystems. Am J Altern Agric 3:19–25 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calenge, C (2006) The package ‘adehabitat’ for the R software: a tool for the analysis of space and habitat use by animals. Ecol Modell 197:516–519 Google Scholar
Cardina, J, Norquay, HM, Stinner, BR, McCartney, DA (1996) Postdispersal predation of velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) seeds. Weed Sci 44:534–539 Google Scholar
Carmona, DM, Landis, DA (1999) Influence of refuge habitats and cover crops on seasonal activity-density of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in field crops. Environ Entomol 28:1145–1153 Google Scholar
Clark, WR, Young, RE (1986) Crop damage by small mammals in no-till cornfields. J Soil Water Conserv 41:338–341 Google Scholar
Cramer, MJ (2014) Seeds of doubt: feeding preferences of white-footed deer mice (Peromyscus leucopus noveboracensis) and woodland deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus gracilis) on maple (genus Acer) seeds. Can J Zool 92:771–776 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, AS, Dixon, PM, Liebman, M (2003) Cropping system effects on giant foxtail (Setaria faberi) demography: II. retrospective perturbation analysis. Weed Sci 51:930–939 Google Scholar
Degen, AA, Kam, M, Khokhlova, IS, Krasnov, BR, Barraclough, TG (1998) Average daily metabolic rate of rodents: habitat and dietary comparisons. Funct Ecol 12:63–73 Google Scholar
Denlinger, DL, Lee, RE (1998) Physiology of cold sensitivity. Pages 59–95 in Hallam GJ & Denlinger DL eds, Temperature Sensitivity in Insects and Application in Integrated Pest Management. Boulder, CO: Westview Google Scholar
Doudna, JW, Danielson, BJ (2015) Rapid morphological change in the masticatory structures of an important ecosystem service provider. PLoS ONE 10:e0127218 Google Scholar
Drickhamer, LC (1970) Seed preferences of wild caught Peromyscus maniculatus bairdii and Peromyscus leucopus noveboracensis . J Mammal 51:191–194 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Everett, RL, Meeuwig, RO, Stevens, R (1978) Deer mouse preference for seed of commonly planted species, indigenous weed seed, and sacrifice foods. J Range Manage 31:70–73 Google Scholar
Fischer, C, Thies, C, Tscharntke, T (2011) Mixed effects of landscape complexity and farming practice on weed seed removal. Perspect Plant Ecol 13:297–303 Google Scholar
Gallandt, ER, Molloy, T, Lynch, RP, Drummond, FA (2005) Effect of cover-cropping systems on invertebrate seed predation. Weed Sci 53:69–76 Google Scholar
Getz, LL, Brighty, E (1986) Potential effects of small mammals in high-intensity agricultural systems in east-central Illinois, U.S.A. Agric Ecosyst Environ 15:39–50 Google Scholar
Greenwood, JJD (1985) Frequency-dependent selection by predators. Oikos 44:195–210 Google Scholar
Harrison, SK, Regnier, EE, Schmoll, JT (2003) Postdispersal predation of giant ragweed (Abrosia trifida) seed in no-tillage corn. Weed Sci 51:955–964 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrold, RL, Nalewaja, JD (1977) Proximate, mineral and amino acid composition of 15 weed seeds. J Anim Sci 44:389–394 Google Scholar
Kaufman, LW, Collier, G (1981) The economics of seed handling. Am Nat 118:46–60 Google Scholar
Kelrick, MI, MacMahon, JA, Parmenter, RR, Sisson, DV (1986) Native seed preferences of shrub-steppe rodents, birds and ants: the relationships of seed attributes and seed use. Oecologia 68:327–337 Google Scholar
Lichti, NI, Steele, MA, Swihart, RK (2015) Seed fate and decision-making processes in scatter-hoarding rodents. Biol Rev 92:474–504 Google Scholar
Lundren, JG, Rosentrater, KA (2007) The strength of seeds and their destruction by granivorous insects. Arthropod-Plant Inte 1:93–99 Google Scholar
Marino, PC, Cross, KL, Landis, DA (1997) Weed seed loss due to predation in Michigan maize fields. Agric Ecosyst Environ 66:189–196 Google Scholar
Mauchline, AL, Watson, SJ, Brown, VK, Froud-Williams, RJ (2005) Post-dispersal seed predation of non-target weeds in arable crops. Weed Res 45:157–164 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menalled, FD, Marino, PC, Renner, KA, Landis, DA (2000) Post-dispersal weed seed predation in Michigan crop fields as a function of agricultural landscape structure. Agric Ecosyst Environ 77:193–202 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menalled, FD, Smith, RG, Dauer, JT, Fox, TB (2007) Impact of agricultural management on carabid communities and weed seed predation. Agric Ecosyst Environ 118:49–54 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navntoft, S, Wratten, SD, Kristensen, K, Esbjerg, P (2011) Weed seed predation in organic and conventional fields. Biol Control 49:11–16 Google Scholar
Neu, CW, Byers, CJ, Peek, JM (1974) A technique for analysis of utilization-availability data. J Wildl Manage 38:541–545 Google Scholar
Orrock, JL, Danielson, BJ, Brinkerhoff, J (2004) Rodent foraging is affected by indirect, but not direct, cues of predation risk. Behav Ecol 15:433–437 Google Scholar
Owen, SF, Berl, JL, Edwards, JW, Ford, WM, Wood, PB (2015) Raccoon (Procyon lotor) diurnal den use within an intensively managed forest in central West Virginia. Northeast Nat 22:41–52 Google Scholar
Power, AG (2010) Ecosystem services and agriculture: tradeoffs and synergies. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 365:2959–2971 Google Scholar
Pulliam, RH (1974) On the theory of optimal habitats. Am Nat 108:59–74 Google Scholar
R Development Core Team. (2016). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing Google Scholar
Richardson, KB, Lichti, NI, Swihart, RK (2013) Acorn-foraging preferences of four species of free-ranging avian seed predators in eastern deciduous forests. Condor 115:863–873 Google Scholar
Schroeder, M, Deli, J, Schall, ED, Warren, GF (1974) Seed composition of 66 weed and crop species. Weed Sci 22:345–348 Google Scholar
Stebbins, LL (1977) Energy requirements during reproduction of Peromyscus maniculatus . Can J Zool 55:1701–1704 Google Scholar
Sundaram, M, Lichti, NI, Steele, MA, Dalgleish, HJ, Swihart, RK (2016) Frequency-dependent hoarding by Sciurus carolinensis occurs with seeds of similar perceived value. J Mammal 98:124–134 Google Scholar
Sundaram, M, Willoughby, JR, Lichti, NI, Steele, MA, Swihart, RK (2015) Segregating the effects of seed traits and common ancestry of hardwood trees on eastern gray squirrel foraging decisions. PLoS ONE 10:e0130942 Google Scholar
Sunyer, P, Espelta, JM, Bonal, R, Munoz, A (2014) Seeding phenology influences wood mouse seed choices: the overlooked role of timing in the foraging decisions by seed-dispersing rodents. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 68:1205–1213 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swihart, RK (1990) Common components of orchard ground cover selected as food by captive woodchucks. J Wildl Manage 54:412–417 Google Scholar
Theimer, TC (2005) Rodent scatterhoarders as conditional mutualists. Pages 283–296 in Forget PM, Lambert JE, Hulme PE & Vander Wall SB eds, Seed Fate: Predation, Dispersal and Seedling Establishment. Wallingford, UK: CABI Google Scholar
Tkachuk, R, Mellish, VJ (1977) Amino acid and proximate analyses of weed seeds. Can J Plant Sci 57:243–249 Google Scholar
Tscharntke, T, Clough, Y, Wagner, TC, Jackson, L, Motzke, I, Perfecto, I, Vandermeer, J, Whitbread, A (2012) Global food security, biodiversity conservation and the future of agricultural intensification. Biol Conserv 151:53–59 Google Scholar
Tscharntke, T, Klein, AM, Kruess, A, Steffan-Dewenter, I, Thies, C (2005) Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity—ecosystem service management. Ecol Lett 8:857–874 Google Scholar
[USDA] U.S. Department of Agriculture (2015). Food Composition Databases. https://ndb.nal.usda.gov. Accessed: June 23, 2016Google Scholar
van der Laat, R, Owen, MDK, Liebman, M, Leon, RG (2015) Postdispersal weed seed predation and invertebrate activity density in three tillage regimes. Weed Sci 63:828–838 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vander Wall, SB (2010) How plants manipulate the scatter-hoarding behaviour of seed-dispersing animals. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 365:989–997 Google Scholar
Westerman, PR, Hofman, A, Vet, LEM, van der Werf, W (2003) Relative importance of vertebrates and invertebrates in epigeaic weed seed predation in organic cereal fields. Agric Ecosyst Environ 95:417–425 Google Scholar
Whitaker, JO (1966) Food of Mus musculus, Peromyscus maniculatus bairdii and Peromyscus leucopus in Vito County, Indiana. J Mammal 47:473–486 Google Scholar
White, SS, Renner, KA, Menalled, FD, Landis, DA (2007) Feeding preferences of weed seed predators and effect on weed emergence. Weed Sci 55:606–612 Google Scholar
Williams, CL, Liebman, M, Westerman, PR, Borza, J, Sundberg, D, Danielson, B (2009) Over-winter predation of Abutilon theophrasti and Setaria faberi seeds in arable land. Weed Sci 49:439–447 Google Scholar
Zimmerman, EG (1965) A comparison of habitat and food of two species of Microtus . J Mammal 46:605–612 Google Scholar