Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:04:05.140Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Yellow (Cyperus esculentus) and purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus) are not injured by increasing root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita) population density

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Jill Schroeder ,
Stephen H. Thomas  and
Leigh W. Murray
Stephen H. Thomas
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Plant Pathology, and Weed Science, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM 88003–0003
Leigh W. Murray
Affiliation:
University Statistics Center, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM 88003–0003
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Greenhouse studies in 1995 and 1996 examined the response of yellow and purple nutsedge to inoculation with increasing densities of southern root-knot nematodes. Yellow and purple nutsedge root and shoot weight, numbers of leaves and tubers produced, and tuber weight were unaffected across 17 nematode inoculum densities that ranged from 0 to 20,000 eggs per 15-cm pot, four times the maximum nematode density recorded under field conditions in New Mexico. Hence, yellow and purple nutsedge do not exhibit a classic threshold response to root-knot nematodes. Moreover, the results suggest that the relationship between these nematodes and perennial nutsedges is an example of a positive biological interaction. The relationship between root-knot nematodes and purple nutsedge appears to be one of commensalism, because while the nematodes reproduced effectively, purple nutsedge reproduction was not related to final nematode populations. The relationship between yellow nutsedge and root-knot nematodes appears to be a mutually beneficial one, because yellow nutsedge tuber number and weight and root weight increased as final nematode populations increased. However, while both nutsedges were unaffected in the absence of the association, root-knot nematodes cannot survive without a host plant.

Keywords

Yellow nutsedge, Cyperus esculentus L. CYPESpurple nutsedge, Cyperus rotundus L. CYPROsouthern root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita Kofoid & White (Chitwood), host race 3.Threshold response, weed–nematode interactions, weed-pest interactions, positive interaction, commensalism.
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 47 , Issue 2 , April 1999 , pp. 201 - 207
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Bird, G. W. and Hogger, C. H. 1973. Nutsedges as hosts of plant-parasitic nematodes in Georgia cotton fields. Plant Dis. Rep. 57: 402.Google Scholar
Hogger, C. H. and Bird, G. W. 1976. Weed and indicator hosts of plant-parasitic nematodes in Georgia cotton and soybean fields. Plant Dis. Rep. 60: 223–226.Google Scholar
Hussey, R. S. and Barker, K. R. 1973. A comparison of methods of collecting inocula for Meloidogyne spp., including a new technique. Plant Dis. Rep. 57: 1025–1028.Google Scholar
Jatala, P. and Russell, C. C. 1972. Nature of sweet potato resistance to Meloidogyne incognita and the effects of temperature on parasitism. J. Nematol. 4: 1–7.Google ScholarPubMed
Klump, R. S. and Thomas, S. H. 1987. Comparative resistance of selected Acala 1517 cotton cultivars to Meloidogyne incognita race 3. Ann. Appl. Nematol. 1: 113–115.Google Scholar
Lindsey, D. L. and Clayshulte, M. S. 1982. Influence of initial population densities of Meloidogyne incognita on three chile cultivars. J. Nematol. 14: 353–358.Google ScholarPubMed
McSorley, R. 1998. Population dynamics. Pages 109–133 in Barker, K. R., Pederson, G. A., and Windham, G. L., eds. Plant and Nematode Interactions. Agronomy Monograph No. 36. Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy.Google Scholar
Powers, L. E. and McSorley, R. 1993. Energetics of Meloidogyne incognita on resistant and susceptible Alyce clover genotypes. J. Nematol. 25: 257–264.Google Scholar
Prot, J. C. and Van Gundy, S. D. 1981. Influence of photoperiod and temperature on migrations of Meloidogyne juveniles. J. Nematol. 13: 217–220.Google ScholarPubMed
Radosevich, S., Holt, J., and Ghersa, C. 1997. Weed Ecology: Implications for Management. 2nd ed. New York: J. Wiley and Sons. pp. 164–165, 317–331.Google Scholar
Schroeder, J., Kenney, M. J., Thomas, S. H., and Murray, L. W. 1994. Yellow nutsedge response to southern root-knot nematode, chile pepper, and metolachlor. Weed Sci. 42: 534–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schroeder, J., Thomas, S. H., and Murray, L. 1993. Yellow and purple nutsedge and chile peppers host southern root-knot nematode. Weed Sci. 41: 150–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, S. H., Murray, L. W., and Cardenas, M. 1995. Relationship of preplant population densities of Meloidogyne incognita to damage in three chile pepper cultivars. Plant Dis. 79: 557–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, S. H., Schroeder, J., Kenney, M. J., and Murray, L. W. 1997. Meloidogyne incognita inoculum source affects host suitability and growth of yellow nutsedge and chile pepper. J. Nematol. 29: 404–410.Google ScholarPubMed
Windham, G. L. and Williams, W. P. 1988. Resistance of maize inbreds to Meloidogyne incognita and M. arenaria . Plant Dis. 72: 67–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar