Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:14:21.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Agrichemical Interactions with Propanil on Propanil-Resistant Barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Jason K. Norsworthy ,
Jeffery S. Rutledge ,
Ronald E. Talbert  and
Robert E. Hoagland
Jason K. Norsworthy*
Affiliation:
Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville. AR 72704
Jeffery S. Rutledge
Affiliation:
Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville. AR 72704
Ronald E. Talbert
Affiliation:
Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville. AR 72704
Robert E. Hoagland
Affiliation:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service. Southern Weed Science Research Unit, Stoneville, MS 38776
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: jnorswo@comp.uark.edu.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Agrichemical interactions between propanil; the herbicides HOE 30374, pendimethalin, piperophos, quinclorac, and thiobencarb; and the insecticide carbaryl were evaluated under field conditions to find synergistic or additive interactions useful to control a barnyardgrass biotype resistant to propanil (R-BYG) without injuring rice. Propanil and each compound were evaluated at four rates for a total of 16 rate combinations for each additive. Averaged over all experiments, 2- to 3-leaf R-BYG control with propanil alone at 0.83, 1.65, 3.3, and 6.6 kg ai/ha was 33, 53, 62, and 81% at 7 d after treatment (DAT). Propanil-susceptible barnyardgrass (S-BYG) response to propanil alone at similar rates was 52, 73, 88, and 94% control. HOE 30374, carbaryl, piperophos, or pendimethalin in combination with propanil produced synergistic effects on R-BYG. For each compound tested, at least one rate combination with propanil controlled R-BYG > 80% with minimal rice injury (< 20%) at 7 DAT. Use of these combinations of compounds could provide more effective control of this resistant biotype and help prevent its spread.

Keywords

HOE 30374 (proposed common name anilofos), S-[2-[(4-chlorophenyl)(1-methylethyl)amino]-2-oxoethyl] O,O-dimethylphosphorodithioatecarbaryl, 1-naphthyl N-methylcarbamatependimethalin, N-(1-ethylpropyl)-3,4-dimethyl-2,6-dinitrobenzenaminepiperophos, S-[2-(2-methyl-1-piperidinyl)-2-oxoethyl]O,O-dipropyl phosphorodithioatepropanil, N-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)propanamidequinclorac, 3,7-dichloro-8-quinolinecarboxylic acidthiobencarb S-[(4-chlorophenyl) methyl]diethylcarbamothioatebarnyardgrass, Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) Beauv. #ECHCGrice, Oryza sativa L. ‘Kaybonnet.’Biotypeherbicide resistanceHOE 30374carbarylpendimethalinpiperophosquincloracthiobencarbECHCGDAT, days after treatmentR-BYG, propanil-resistant barnyardgrassS-BYG, propanil-susceptible barnyardgrass
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , June 1999 , pp. 296 - 302
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

Published with the approval of the Director, Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station.

References

Literature Cited

Ahrens, W. H., ed. 1994. Herbicide Handbook. 7th ed. Champaign, IL: Weed Science Society of America. 352 p.Google Scholar
Baltazar, A. M. and Smith, R. J. Jr. 1994. Propanil-resistant barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) control in rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Technol. 8:576–581.Google Scholar
Bowling, C. C. and Flinchum, W. T. 1968. Interaction of propanil with insecticides applied as seed treatments on rice. J. Econ. Entomol. 61:67–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowling, C. C. and Hudgins, H. R. 1966. The effects of insecticides on the selectivity of propanil on rice. Weeds 14:94–95.Google Scholar
Carey, V. F. III, Duke, S. O., Hoagland, R. E., and Talbert, R. E. 1995a. Resistance mechanism of propanil-resistant barnyardgrass: absorption, translocation, and site of action studies. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 52:182–189.Google Scholar
Carey, V. F. III, Hoagland, R. E., and Talbert, R. E. 1995b. Verification and distribution of propanil-resistant barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) in Arkansas. Weed Technol. 9:366–372.Google Scholar
Caseley, J. C. and Leah, J. M. 1996. Combating propanil resistance in Echinochloa colona with synergists that inhibit acylamidase and oxygenases. Proc. Second Int. Weed Control Congr. 2:455–460.Google Scholar
Chang, F.-Y., Smith, L. W., and Stephenson, G. R. 1971. Insecticide inhibition of herbicide metabolism in leaf tissues. J. Agric. Food Chem. 19:1183–1186.Google Scholar
Colby, S. R. 1967. Calculating synergistic and antagonistic responses of herbicide combinations. Weeds 5:20–22.Google Scholar
Crawford, S. H. and Jordan, D. L. 1995. Comparison of single and multiple applications of propanil and residual herbicides in dry-seeded rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Technol. 9:153–157.Google Scholar
De Prado, R., Lopez-Martinez, N., and Gimenez-Espinosa, R. 1997. Herbicide-resistant weeds in Europe: agricultural, physiological, and biochemical aspects. In De Prado, R., Jorrín, J., and García, L., eds. Weed and Crop Resistance to Herbicides. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 17–27.Google Scholar
Duke, S. O. 1985. Weed Physiology. Volume II: Herbicide Physiology. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. 257 p.Google Scholar
El-Refai, A. R. and Mowafy, M. 1973. Interaction of propanil with insecticides absorbed from soil and translocated into rice plants. Weed Sci. 21:246–248.Google Scholar
Frear, D. S. and Still, G. G. 1968. The metabolism of 3,4-dichloropropionanilide in plants. Partial purification and properties of an aryl acylamidase from rice. Phytochemistry 7:913–920.Google Scholar
Hatzios, K. K. and Penner, D. 1985. Interactions of herbicides with other agrochemicals in higher plants. Rev. Weed Sci. 1:1–64.Google Scholar
Hoagland, R. E., Carey, V. F. III, Duke, S. O., and Talbert, R. E. 1997. Distribution studies of propanil resistance in a barnyardgrass biotype and elucidation of its resistance mechanism. In De Prado, R., Jorrín, J., and García, L., eds. Weed and Crop Resistance to Herbicides. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 145–153.Google Scholar
Hoagland, R. E., Norsworthy, J. K., and Talbert, R. E. 1999. Chemical interactions with the herbicide propanil on propanil-resistant barnyardgrass. Pestic. Sci. In press.Google Scholar
Jordan, D. L. 1997. Efficacy of reduced-rates of quinclorac applied with propanil or propanil plus molinate in dry-seeded rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Sci. 45:824–828.Google Scholar
Jordan, D. L., Miller, D. K., and Crawford, S. H. 1998. Barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) control in dry-seeded rice (Oryza sativa) with soil-applied and postemergence herbicide programs. Weed Technol. 12:69–73.Google Scholar
Leah, J. M., Caseley, J. C., Riches, C. R., and Valverde, B. E. 1994. Association between elevated activity of aryl acylamidase and propanil resistance in jungle-rice (Echinochloa colona). Pestic. Sci. 42:281–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeBaron, H. M. and Gressel, J., eds. 1982. Herbicide Resistance in Plants. New York: John Wiley and Sons. 401 p.Google Scholar
Lopez-Martinez, N. and De Prado, R. 1996. Fate of quinclorac in resistant Echinochloa crus-galli . Proc. Second Int. Weed Control Congr. 2:535–540.Google Scholar
Matsunaka, S. 1968. Propanil hydrolysis: inhibition in rice plants by insecticides. Science 160:1360–1361.Google Scholar
Moreland, D. E. and Huber, S. C. 1972. Inhibition of photosynthesis and respiration by sustituted 2,6-dinitroaniline herbicides. I. Effects on chloroplast and mitochondrial activities. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2:342–353.Google Scholar
Norsworthy, J. K., Talbert, R. E., and Hoagland, R. E. 1998. Chlorophyll fluorescence for rapid detection and confirmation of propanil-resistant barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli). Weed Sci. 46:163–169.Google Scholar
Norsworthy, J. K., Talbert, R. E., and Hoagland, R. E. 1999. Chlorophyll fluorescence evaluation of agrochemical interactions with propanil on propanil-resistant barnyardgrass. Weed Sci. 47:13–19.Google Scholar
Powles, S. B., Preston, C., Bryan, I. B., and Jutsum, A. R. 1997. Herbicide resistance: impact and management. Adv. Agron. 58:57–93.Google Scholar
Smith, R. J. 1988. Weed thresholds in southern U.S. rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Technol. 2:232–241.Google Scholar
Smith, R. J. and Tugwell, N. P. 1975. Propanil–carbofuran interactions in rice. Weed Sci. 23:176–178.Google Scholar
Talbert, R. E., Baines, C., Curless, J. K., Norsworthy, J. K., Daou, H., Helms, R. S., and Black, H. L. 1996. Confirmation, distribution and control of propanil-resistant barnyardgrass. In Norman, R. and Wells, B., eds. Arkansas Rice Research Studies 1995. Fayetteville: Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Service 453. pp. 77–87.Google Scholar
Valverde, B. E. 1996. Management of herbicide resistant weeds in Latin America: the case of propanil-resistant Echinochloa colona in rice. Proc. Second Int. Weed Control Congr. 2:415–420.Google Scholar
Valverde, B. E., Chaves, P., Garita, I., and Vargas, F. 1997. From theory to practice: development of piperophos as a synergist with propanil to combat propanil resistance in junglerice (Echinochloa colona). Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 37:14.Google Scholar
Vaughn, K. C. and Lehnen, L. P. Jr. 1991. Mitotic disrupter herbicides. Weed Sci. 39:450–457.Google Scholar
Walton, L. C. and Holmdal, J. A. 1992. Propanil tank mix strategies in rice for hard-to-control Echinochloa species. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 45:98.Google Scholar
Wills, G. D. and Street, J. E. 1988. Propanil plus methyl parathion on rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Sci. 36:335–339.Google Scholar