Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:45:47.606Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Carryover of Imazethapyr and Imazapic to Nontolerant Rice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Enio Marchesan ,
Fernando M. Dos Santos ,
Mara Grohs ,
Luis A. De Avila ,
Sérgio L. O. Machado ,
Scott A. Senseman ,
Paulo F. S. Massoni  and
Gerson M. S. Sartori
Enio Marchesan*
Affiliation:
Departmento de Fitotecnia, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil
Fernando M. Dos Santos
Affiliation:
Departmento de Fitotecnia, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil
Mara Grohs
Affiliation:
Departmento de Fitotecnia, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil
Luis A. De Avila
Affiliation:
Departmento de Fitotecnia, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil
Sérgio L. O. Machado
Affiliation:
Departmento de Fitotecnia, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil
Scott A. Senseman
Affiliation:
Departmento de Fitotecnia, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil
Paulo F. S. Massoni
Affiliation:
Departmento de Fitotecnia, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil
Gerson M. S. Sartori
Affiliation:
Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77840
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: emarchezan@terra.com.br.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The present work aimed to evaluate plant injury caused by residues in the soil of the formulated mixture of imazethapyr and imazapic to a nontolerant genotype of rice (IRGA 417) drilled at 371 and 705 d after herbicide application (DAA). Herbicide carryover reduced up to 55% of the grain yield of the IRGA 417 drilled at 371 DAA, and plant injury was still evident at 705 DAA but without grain yield reduction.

El objetivo del presente trabajo fue evaluar los daños causados por residuos en el suelo, de una mezcla de imazethapyr e imazapic a plantas de un genotipo de arroz (IRGA 417) no tolerante, tomada la muestra entre los 371 y los 705 días después de la aplicación del herbicida (DAA). El efecto residual del herbicida redujo en hasta 55% el rendimiento del grano de las plantas de IRGA 417 muestreadas a los 371 DAA. Los daños a la planta fueron aún evidentes a los 705 DAA pero sin reducción en el rendimiento del grano.

Keywords

Imazethapyrimazapicrice, Oryza sativa L. ‘IRGA 417’Herbicide soil persistenceimidazolinonesplant injury
Type
Weed Management—Major Crops
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 24 , Issue 1 , March 2010 , pp. 6 - 10
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Current address: Department of Fitotecnia, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Roraima Avenue, 1000, CEP 97105-900, Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil.

References

Literature Cited

Alister, C. and Kogan, M. 2005. Efficacy of imidazolinone herbicides applied to imidazolinone-resistant maize and their carryover effect on rotational crops. Crop Prot 24:375–379.Google Scholar
Avila, L.A., Massey, J.H., Senseman, S.A., Armbrust, K.L., Lancaster, S.R., McCauley, G.N., and Chandler, J.M. 2006. Imazethapyr aqueous photolysis, reaction quantum yield, and hydroxyl radical rate constant. J. Agric. Food Chem 54:2635–2639.Google Scholar
Baughman, T.A. and Shaw, D.R. 1996. Effect of wetting/drying cycles on dissipation patterns of bioavailable imazaquin. Weed Sci 44:380–382.Google Scholar
Che, M., Loux, M., Traina, S.J., and Logan, T.J. 1992. Effect of pH on sorption and desorption of imazaquin and imzethapyr on clays and humic acid. J. Environ. Qual 21:698–703.Google Scholar
Clay, D.V. 1993. Herbicide residues in soils and plants and their bioassay. Pages 153–171. In Streibig, J.C. and Kudsk, P. Herbicide Bioassays. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Counce, P.A., Keisling, T.C., and Mitchell, A.J. 2000. A uniform, objective, and adaptive system for expressing rice development. Crop Sci 40:436–443.Google Scholar
Embrapa, , 1999. Sistema brasileiro de classificação dos solos. Brasília: Embrapa-SPI. 412 p.Google Scholar
Flint, J.F. and Witt, W.W. 1997. Microbial degradation of imazaquin and imazethapyr. Weed Sci 45:586–591.Google Scholar
Kraemer, A.F. 2008. Residual da mistura formulada dos herbicidas imazethapyr e imazapic em áreas de arroz sob diferentes manejos de solo. . Santa Maria, Brazil: Universidade Federal de Santa Maria. 64 p.Google Scholar
Loux, M.M. and Reese, K.D. 1992. Effect of soil pH on adsorption and persistence of imazaquin. Weed Sci 40:490–496.Google Scholar
Madani, M.E., Azzouzi, M.E., Zrineh, A., Martens, D., and Kettrup, A. 2003. pH effect and kinetic studies of the binding behaviour of imazethapyr herbicide on some Moroccan soils. Fresenius Environ. Bull 1:1114–1119.Google Scholar
Moyer, J.R. and Esau, R. 1996. Imidazolinone herbicide effects on following rotational crops in southern Alberta. Weed Technol 10:100–106.Google Scholar
Perez, K.S., Ramos, M.L.G., and McNanus, C. 2005. Nitrogênio da biomassa microbiana em solo cultivado com soja, sob diferentes sistemas de manejo, nos Cerrados. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 40:137–144.Google Scholar
Renner, K.A., Schabenberger, O., and Kells, J.J. 1998. Effect of tillage application method on corn (Zea mays) response to imidazolinone residues in soil. Weed Technol 12:281–285.Google Scholar
Soon, Y.K. and Arshad, M.A. 2005. Tillage and liming effects on crop and labile soil nitrogen in an acid soil. Soil Tillage Res 80:23–33.Google Scholar
Sosbai, , 2005. Arroz Irrigado. Recomendações Técnicas da pesquisa para o Sul do Brasil. Santa Maria, Brazil SOSBAI. 159 p.Google Scholar
Souza, A.P., Prates, H.T., Ferreira, F.A., and El Reis, C.P. 2000. Lixiviação de glyphosate e imazapyr em solos com diferentes texturas e composição química. I–Método de Bioexperimento. Planta Daninha 18:5–16.Google Scholar
Souza, P.R. and Fischer, M.M. 1986. Arroz-vermelho: danos causados à lavoura gaúcha. Lavoura Arrozeira 39 (368):19–20.Google Scholar
Stougaard, R.N., Shea, P.J., and Martin, A.R. 1990. Effect of soil type and pH on adsorption, mobility and efficacy of imazaquin and imazethapyr. Weed Sci 36:67–73.Google Scholar
Villa, S.C.C. 2006. Arroz tolerante a imidazolinonas: controle do arroz-vermelho, persistência de herbicidas e fluxo gênico. . Santa Maria, Brazil: Universidade Federal de Santa Maria. 53 p.Google Scholar
Wyk, L.J.V., Rinnhardt, C.F.A., and , C.F.A. 2001. Biossay technique detects imazathapyr leaching and liming-dependent activity. Weed Technol 15:1–6.Google Scholar
Yoshida, S. 1981. Fundamentals of Rice Crop Science. Manila, Philippines: P. Imprenta. 269 p.Google Scholar