Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T11:58:31.517Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparison of Purple Nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus) from Around the World

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Gene D. Wills*
Affiliation:
Delta Research and Extension Center, Mississippi Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station, Stoneville, MS 38776, E-mail: gwills@drec.msstate.edu

Abstract

Purple nutsedge collections from 13 states within the continental United States and from 21 other locations around the world were studied to compare their reproduction and morphological characteristics. Differences occurred in the number of shoots produced from single tubers, the number of leaves per shoot, and the length and width of leaves. Differences were also found with respect to flowering, length of culms supporting the inflorescences, and number, length, and width of involucral bracts at the apex of the culms. Variations occurred in the flower parts, including the number and length of rachises and the length of rachillae and spikelets. There were differences in the growth patterns of the leaves, with some collections having leaves mostly erect and others having leaves lie more closely to the ground. The color of the leaves varied between light and dark green, and the color of the inflorescence varied between light and dark purplish-brown. Greater variation was found among plants from different locations around the world than from within the continental United States.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Correll, D. S. and Johnston, M. C. 1979. Manual of the Vascular Plants of Texas. Richardson, TX: University of Texas, Richardson. 1881 p.Google Scholar
Fernald, M. L. 1950. Gray's Manual of Botany. 8th ed. New York: American Book Co. 1932 p.Google Scholar
Gleason, H. A. 1963. Illustrated Flora of the Northeastern United States and Adjacent Canada. Volume 1. New York: Hafner Publishing. 482 p.Google Scholar
Godfrey, R. K. and Wooten, J. W. 1979. Aquatic and Wetland Plants of Southeastern United States. Monocotyledons. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press. 712 p.Google Scholar
Hauser, E. W. 1962. Development of purple nutsedge under field conditions. Weeds 10:315321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holm, L. G., Plucknett, D. L., Pancho, J. W., and Herberger, J. P. 1977. The World's Worst Weeds. Distribution and Biology. Honolulu: University Press Hawaii. 609 p.Google Scholar
Plowman, A. B. 1906. The comparative anatomy and phylogeny of Cyperaceae . Ann. Bot. (London) 20:137.Google Scholar
Radford, A. E., Ahles, H. E., and Bell, C. R. 1968. Manual of the Vascular Flora of the Carolinas. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press. 1183 p.Google Scholar
Ranade, S. B. and Burns, W. 1925. The eradication of Cyperus rotundus L. Mem. India Dep. Agric. Bot. Ser. 13(5): 99192.Google Scholar
Thullen, R. J. and Keeley, P. E. 1979. Seed production and germination in Cyperus esculentus and C. rotundus . Weed Sci. 27:502505.Google Scholar
Wills, G. D. 1987. Description of purple and yellow nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus and C. esculentus.). Weed Technol. 1:29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wills, G. D. and Briscoe, G. A. 1970. Anatomy of purple nutsedge. Weed Sci. 18:631635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar