Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:12:25.597Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparison of Single and Multiple Applications of Propanil and Residual Herbicides in Dry-Seeded Rice (Oryza sativa)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Stephen H. Crawford  and
David L. Jordan
Stephen H. Crawford
Affiliation:
Northeast Res. Stn., Louisiana State Univ. Agric. Center, P.O. Box 438, St. Joseph, LA 71366
David L. Jordan
Affiliation:
Northeast Res. Stn., Louisiana State Univ. Agric. Center, P.O. Box 438, St. Joseph, LA 71366
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Experiments were conducted on Sharkey clay and Gigger silt loam soils in northeast Louisiana from 1990 through 1993 to compare season-long barnyardgrass control, rice yield, and estimated economic returns with single and multiple applications of propanil alone or with molinate or thiobencarb. Multiple herbicide applications were more effective than single applications in controlling barnyardgrass and provided the greatest rice yields and economic returns. Applying residual herbicides with propanil improved barnyardgrass control in five of six experiments and increased rice yield and economic returns in three of six experiments.

Keywords

Molinate, 5-ethyl hexahydro-1H-azepine-1-carbothioatepropanil, N-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)propanamidethiobencarb, S-[(4-chlorophenyl)methyl]diethylcarbamothioatebarnyardgrass, Echinochloa crus-galli L. Beauv. # ECHCGrice, Oryza sativa L.Economic analysisweed managementmolinatethiobencarbECHCG
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , March 1995 , pp. 153 - 157
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Elmore, C. D. 1988. Weed survey—Southern states. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 41:396–410.Google Scholar
2. Giesler, G., Heagler, A., Baldridge, T., Huffman, D. C., and Dellenbarger, L. 1992. Projected costs and returns—rice, Louisiana 1992. p. C-66 and C-68 in Projected Costs and Returns and Cash Flows for Major Agricultural Enterprises Louisiana, 1992. Louisiana Agric. Exp. Stn. A. E. A. Information Ser. No. 99–105.Google Scholar
3. Rice Production Manual. 1987. Louisiana State Univ. Agric. Center. Pub. 2321. Baton Rouge, LA 70894.Google Scholar
4. Richard, E. P. Jr. and Street, J. E. 1984. Herbicide performance in rice (Oryza sativa) under three flooding conditions. Weed Sci. 32:157–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Smith, R. J. Jr. 1961. 3,4-Dichloropropionilide for control of barnyardgrass in rice. Weeds 9:318–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Smith, R. J. Jr. 1965. Propanil and mixtures with propanil for weed control in rice. Weeds 13:236–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Smith, R. J. Jr. 1974. Responses of rice to postemergence treatments of propanil. Weed Sci. 22:563–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Smith, R. J. Jr. 1990. Quinclorac combinations for weed control in rice. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 43:116.Google Scholar
9. Smith, R. J. Jr. and Baltazar, A. M. 1992. Control of propanil-tolerant barnyardgrass. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 32:21.Google Scholar
10. Smith, R. J. Jr. and Hill, J. E. 1990. Weed control technology in U.S. rice. p. 314–327 in Grayson, B. T., Green, M. B., and Copping, L. D., eds. Pest Management in Rice. Elsevier Sci. Public Ltd., United Kingdom.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Smith, R. J. Jr. and Khodayari, K. 1985. Herbicide treatments for control of weeds in drill-seeded rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Sci. 33:686–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Street, J. E. and Mueller, T. C. 1993. Rice (Oryza sativa) weed control with soil applications of quinclorac. Weed Technol. 7:600–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Walton, L. C. and Holmdal, J. A. 1992. Propanil tank mix strategies in rice for hard-to-control Echinochloa species. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 45:98.Google Scholar