Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T08:48:52.819Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Control of Red Rice (Oryza sativa) in Imidazolinone-Tolerant Rice (O. sativa)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Gregory L. Steele ,
James M. Chandler  and
Garry N. McCauley
Gregory L. Steele
Affiliation:
Department of Soil and Crop Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-2474
James M. Chandler
Affiliation:
Department of Soil and Crop Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-2474
Garry N. McCauley
Affiliation:
Texas A&M Agricultural Research and Extension Center, Eagle Lake, TX 77434
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted near Beaumont, TX, to evaluate red rice control in imidazolinone-tolerant rice. Imazethapyr was applied preplant incorporated (PPI) and preemergence (PRE) at 70 and 105 g ai/ha and postemergence (POST) at 36, 52, and 70 g/ha. Single imazethapyr applications were made at each rate and timing and in sequential PPI or PRE followed by POST treatments. Red rice control ranged from 92 to 98% with sequential imazethapyr applications. Red rice control was higher when imazethapyr was applied PPI alone than PRE alone. But when these treatments were followed by a POST application of imazethapyr, there were no differences in red rice control between PPI and PRE application. Red rice control with sequential treatments was not improved with increased rates of imazethapyr POST. Visual injury to the 93AS3510 imidazolinone-tolerant variety was 5% or less 20 d after treatment (DAT), and there was no injury by 45 DAT. But POST applications of 70 g/ha imazethapyr may produce minor yield reductions to this experimental variety without improving red rice control. Results indicate that an imidazolinone-tolerant rice production system can be effective for controlling red rice and that PRE applications must be followed by a POST application to achieve maximum red rice control. PPI applications of imazethapyr at 70 g/ha should also be followed by a POST application to maximize red rice control.

Keywords

Imazethapyrred rice, Oryza sativa L. # ORYSA ‘93AS3510’rice, Oryza sativa L. #3 ORYSAClearfield rice, imidazolinone-tolerant rice, Newpath, red rice controlDAT, days after treatmentPOST, postemergencePPI, preplant incorporatedPRE, preemergence
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 16 , Issue 3 , September 2002 , pp. 627 - 630
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Ahrens, W. H. ed. 1994. Herbicide Handbook. 7th ed. Champaign, IL: Weed Science Society of America. pp. 147–149, 166–168.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 1995. Southern Weed Science Society's Weeds of the United States and Canada. CD-ROM. Champaign, IL: Southern Weed Science Society.Google Scholar
Askew, S. D., Street, J. E., and Shaw, D. R. 1998. Herbicide programs for red rice (Oryza sativa) control in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 12: 103–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diarra, A., Smith, R. J. Jr.,, and Talbert, R. E. 1985. Interferences of red rice (Oryza sativa) with rice (O. sativa). Weed Sci. 33: 644–649.Google Scholar
Dillon, T. L., Baldwin, F. L., and Webster, E. P. 1998. Weed control in imi-tolerant rice. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 51: 268.Google Scholar
Dowler, C. C. 1994. Weed survey—southern states. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 47: 279–299.Google Scholar
Hackworth, H. M., Sarokin, L. P., and White, R. H. 1998. 1997 Field evaluation of imidazolinone tolerant rice. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 51: 221.Google Scholar
Klingaman, T. E., King, C. A., and Oliver, L. R. 1992. Effect of application rate, weed species and weed stage of growth on imazethapyr activity. Weed Sci. 40: 227–232.Google Scholar
Kwon, S. L., Smith, R. J. Jr.,, and Talbert, R. E. 1991. Interference of red rice (Oryza sativa) densities in rice (O. sativa). Weed Sci. 39: 169–174.Google Scholar
Mangels, G. 1991. Behavior of the imidazolinone herbicides in soil—a review of the literature. In Shaner, D. L. and O'Connor, S. L., eds. The Imidazolinone Herbicides. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. pp. 192–194.Google Scholar
Masson, J. A. 2001. Flood depth, application timing, and imazethapyr activity in imidazolinone-tolerant rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Technol. 15: 315–319.Google Scholar
Nelson, R. J. 1907. Rice culture. Ark. Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. 98: 31–45.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. A., Renner, K. A., and Penner, D. 1998. Weed control in soybean (Glycine max) with imazamox and imazethapyr. Weed Sci. 46: 587–594.Google Scholar
Noldin, J. A., Chandler, J. M., and McCauley, G. N. 1999. Red rice (Oryza sativa) biology. I. Characterization of red rice ecotypes. Weed Technol. 13: 12–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, D. E., Strahan, R. E., Linscombe, S. D., and Croughan, T. P. 1998. Control of red rice (Oryza sativa) in imidazolinone tolerant rice. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 51: 36–37.Google Scholar
Stidham, M. A. and Singh, B. K. 1991. Imidazolinone–acetohydroxyacid synthase interactions. In Shaner, D. L. and O'Connor, S. L., eds. The Imidazolinone Herbicides. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. pp. 71–90.Google Scholar
Stougaard, R. N., Shea, P. J., and Martin, A. R. 1990. Effect of soil type and pH on adsorption, mobility, and efficacy of imazaquin and imazethapyr. Weed Sci. 38: 67–73.Google Scholar
White, R. H. and Hackworth, H. M. 1999. Weed control with imidazolinone tolerant rice. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 52: 185.Google Scholar
Wilcut, J. W., Richburg, J. S. III, Wiley, G. L., and Walls, F. R. Jr. 1996. Postemergence AC 263,222 systems for weed control in peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Sci. 44: 615–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar