Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T02:01:39.512Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of Repeat Annual Applications of Dichlobenil on Weed Populations and Yield Components of Cranberry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Hilary A. Sandler ,
Joanne Mason ,
Wesley R. Autio  and
Thomas A. Bewick
Hilary A. Sandler*
Affiliation:
University of Massachusetts–Amherst Cranberry Station, P.O. Box 569, East Wareham, MA 02538
Joanne Mason
Affiliation:
University of Massachusetts–Amherst Cranberry Station, P.O. Box 569, East Wareham, MA 02538
Wesley R. Autio
Affiliation:
Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Massachusetts–Amherst, Amherst, MA 01002
Thomas A. Bewick
Affiliation:
National Program Leader–Horticulture, Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC 20250
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: hsandler@umext.umass.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

To address grower concerns that repeated use of dichlobenil could negatively affect cranberry productivity, field studies were conducted at two commercial farms in either high weed density (HW) or low weed density (LW) areas. Data from 4 yr of repeat annual applications of 0, 1.8, and 4.5 kg ai/ha dichlobenil indicated minimal negative impact on cranberry vines. Herbicide application did not affect upright productivity, leaf biomass production, percent fruit set, or other yield parameters adversely; in addition, no improvement in these parameters was noted. Although the interaction of herbicide application with weed density on cranberry root length varied with sampling date, no consistent trend (adverse or positive) was seen. The presence of weeds, rather than herbicide application, was the important determinant of yield. Vines in LW areas produced more marketable fruit and had higher percentage of fruit set than vines growing in HW areas. Repeat annual applications of dichlobenil on commercial cranberry beds may be considered as part of a viable integrated weed management program with no adverse effect on crop growth or yield.

Keywords

Dichlobenilcranberry, Vaccinium macrocarpon AitHerbicidesroot lengthvegetation surveyweed communityHW, high weed densityLW, low weed density
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 18 , Issue 3 , September 2004 , pp. 648 - 657
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

∗ This research is a part of a dissertation submitted by the senior author in fulfilling doctoral degree requirements at the University of Massachusetts–Amherst.

References

Literature Cited

Barbour, M. G., Burk, J. H., and Pitts, W. D. 1987. Methods of Sampling the Plant Community. Terrestrial Plant Ecology. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin/Cummings. Pp. 162–168, 182–208.Google Scholar
Bowley, S. R. 1995. A Hitchhiker's Guide to Statistics in Plant Biology. Guelph, ON, Canada: Plants et al. Pp. 91–104.Google Scholar
Caruso, F. L. and Ramsdell, D. C. 1995. Compendium of Blueberry and Cranberry Diseases. St. Paul, MN: American Phytopathological Society. Pp. 29–32.Google Scholar
Crompton Uniroyal Chemical. 2003. Casoron 4G product label. Crop Protection Product Information. Middlebury, CT: Crompton. Pp. 4–7.Google Scholar
Dana, M. N., Skroch, W. A., and Boone, D. M. 1965. Granular herbicides for cranberry bogs. Weeds 13:5–7.Google Scholar
DeJong, T. M. 1975. A comparison of three diversity indices based on their components of richness and evenness. Oikos 26:222–227.Google Scholar
DeMoranville, C. J. and Davenport, J. R. 1997. Phosphorus forms, rates, and timing in Massachusetts cranberry production. Acta Hortic 446:381–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demoranville, I. E. and Cross, C. E. 1964. Casoron and weed control in cranberries. Cranberries 29/4:13–14.Google Scholar
Demoranville, I. E. and Devlin, R. M. 1969. Some effects of dichlobenil on the physiology of cranberries in Massachusetts. Cranberries 33/11:6–8.Google Scholar
Devlin, R. M. and Demoranville, I. E. 1968. Influence of dichlobenil on yield, size, and pigmentation of cranberries. Weed Sci. 16:38–39.Google Scholar
Devlin, R. M. and Demoranville, I. E. 1974. Influence of dichlobenil and three experimental herbicides on bud break, terminal growth, and root development of cranberry cuttings. Abstr. Ann. Mtg. Weed Sci. Soc. Am 14:14–15.Google Scholar
Eaton, G. W. and Kyte, T. R. 1978. Yield component analysis in the cranberry. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci 103:578–583.Google Scholar
Eck, P. 1976. Relationship of nitrogen nutrition of ‘Early Black’ cranberry to vegetative growth, fruit yield and quality. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci 101:375–377.Google Scholar
Eck, P. 1990. The American Cranberry. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press. Pp. 43–55.Google Scholar
Else, M. J., Sandler, H. A., and Schluter, S. 1995. Weed mapping as a component of integrated pest management in cranberry production. HortTechnology 5:302–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleason, H. A. and Cronquist, A. 1991. Manual of Vascular Plants of Northeastern United States and Adjacent Canada. 2nd ed. Bronx, NY: New York Botanical Garden. 910 p.Google Scholar
Heeney, H. B., Warren, V., and Khan, S. U. 1981. Effects of annual repeat applications of simazine, diuron, terbacil, and dichlobenil in a mature apple orchard. Can. J. Plant Sci 61:325–329.Google Scholar
Hogue, E. J. and Neilsen, G. H. 1988. Effects of excessive annual applications of terbacil, diuron, simazine, and dichlobenil on vigor, yield, and cation nutrition of young apple trees. Can. J. Plant Sci 68:843–850.Google Scholar
Hurlbert, S. H. 1971. The nonconcept of species diversity: a critique and alternative parameters. Ecology 52:577–586.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kusek, C. C. 1991. Dodder, the parasitic swamp creature. Harvest Magazine. Volume 13. Lakeville-Middleboro, MA: Ocean Spray Cranberries. Pp. 10–11.Google Scholar
Lacroix, D. S. 1926. Cranberry flower-bud investigations. J. Agric. Res 33:355–363.Google Scholar
Lapointe, L. and Rochefort, L. 2001. Weed survey of lowbush blueberry fields in Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean, Quebec, following eight years of herbicide application. Can. J. Plant Sci 81:471–478.Google Scholar
Miller, C. W., Demoranville, I. E., and Charig, A. J. 1966. Persistence of dichlobenil in cranberry bogs. Weeds 14:296–298.Google Scholar
Roper, T. R. and Klueh, J. S. 1994. Removing new growth reduces fruiting in cranberry. HortScience 29:199–201.Google Scholar
Roper, T. R., Patten, K. D., DeMoranville, C. J., Davenport, J. R., Strik, B. C., and Poole, A. P. 1993. Fruiting of cranberry uprights reduces fruiting the following year. HortScience 28:228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandler, H. A. 1995. Application of antitranspirant and reduced rate fungicide combinations for fruit rot management in cranberries. Plant Dis 79:956–961.Google Scholar
Sandler, H. A. 2004. Factors Influencing the Colonization and Establishment of Plant Species on Cranberry Bogs. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Massachusetts–Amherst, Amherst, MA. In press.Google Scholar
Sandler, H. A. and DeMoranville, C. J. 1999. Influence of cultural practices on the activity of dichlobenil in cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon) bogs. HortScience 34:1048–1050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shannon, C. E. and Weaver, W. 1949. The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana-Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press. 144 p.Google Scholar
Skroch, W. A., Sheets, T. J., and Monaco, T. J. 1975. Weed populations and herbicide residues in apple orchards after 5 years. Weed Sci. 23:53–57.Google Scholar
Strik, B. C. and Poole, A. P. 1991. Timing and severity of pruning effects on cranberry yield components and fruit anthocyanin. HortScience 26:1462–1464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strik, B. C., Roper, T. R., DeMoranville, C. J., Davenport, J. R., and Poole, A. P. 1991. Cultivar and growing region influence return bloom in cranberry uprights. HortScience 26:1366–1367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uva, R. H., Neal, J. C., and DiTomaso, J. M. 1997. Weeds of the Northeast. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. 397 p.Google Scholar
Yarborough, D. E. and Bhowmik, P. C. 1989. Effect of hexazinone on weed populations and lowbush blueberries in Maine. Acta Hortic 241:344–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yas, A. M. and Eaton, G. W. 1982. Effect of cotton-grass on the yield components of cranberry. Sci. Hortic 18:125–129.Google Scholar