Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T15:06:42.862Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Efficacy of Sulfonylurea Herbicides when Tank Mixed with Mesotrione

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Christopher L. Schuster
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506
Kassim Al-Khatib*
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506
J. Anita Dille
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: khatib@ksu.edu

Abstract

Experiments were conducted in the greenhouse and the field to evaluate the efficacy of various sulfonylurea herbicides applied with mesotrione or mesotrione + atrazine. The addition of mesotrione or mesotrione + atrazine to sulfonylurea herbicides had no adverse effects on the control of large crabgrass or velvetleaf in a controlled environment. Tank mixing mesotrione or mesotrione + atrazine with nicosulfuron or foramsulfuron, however, antagonized nicosulfuron and foramsulfuron control of green foxtail and shattercane. Field experiments conducted in 2004 and 2005 also indicated that addition of mesotrione + atrazine to a sulfonylurea herbicide decreased herbicidal efficacy on green foxtail, yellow foxtail, and shattercane, compared with the sulfonylurea herbicide applied alone. In addition, increasing mesotrione application from 53 to 105 g/ha decreased efficacy of sulfonylurea herbicide in the tank mix on selected grass species. This research showed that the addition of mesotrione to sulfonylurea herbicides resulted in decreased efficacy of sulfonylurea herbicides on green foxtail, yellow foxtail, and shattercane. The addition of atrazine to the tank mix or an increased mesotrione rate will further decrease herbicide efficacy of sulfonylurea herbicides on shattercane and foxtail species.

Type
Weed Management — Major Crops
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Abendroth, J. A., Martin, A. R., and Roeth, F. W. 2006. Plant response to combinations of mesotrione and photosystem II inhibitors. Weed Technol. 20:267274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armel, G. R., Wilson, H. P., Richardson, R. J., and Hines, T. E. 2003. Use of mixtures of mesotrione, imazethapyr, and imazethapyr plus imazapyr in imidazolinone-resistant corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 17:674679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camacho, R. F. and Moshier, L. J. 1991. Absorption, translocation, and activity of CGA-136872, DPX-V9360, and glyphosate in rhizome johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense). Weed Sci. 39:354357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cantwell, J. R., Liebel, R. A., and Slife, F. W. 1989. Imazethapyr for weed control in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 3:596601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colby, S. R. 1967. Calculating synergistic and antagonistic responses of herbicide combinations. Weeds. 15:2022.Google Scholar
Creech, J. E., Monaco, T. A., and Evans, J. O. 2004. Photosynthetic and growth responses of Zea mays L. and four weed species following post-emergence treatments with mesotrione and atrazine. Pest Manag. Sci. 60:10791084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croon, K. A. and Merkle, M. G. 1988. Effects of bentazon, imazaquin, or chlorimuron on haloxyfop or fluazifop-P efficacy. Weed Technol. 2:3640.Google Scholar
Damalas, C. A. and Eleftherohorinos, I. G. 2001. Dicamba and atrazine antagonism on sulfonylurea herbicides used for johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) control in corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 15:6267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, S. E., Kells, J. J., and Penner, D. 1992. Influence of adjuvants on the efficacy, absorption, and spray retention of primisulfuron. Weed Technol. 6:592598.Google Scholar
Hart, S. E. and Penner, D. 1993. Atrazine reduces primisulfuron transport to meristems of giant foxtail (Setaria faberi) and velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti). Weed Sci. 41:2833.Google Scholar
Hart, S. E. and Wax, L. M. 1996. Dicamba antagonizes grass weed control with imazethapyr by reducing foliar absorption. Weed Technol. 10:828834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartzler, R. G. and Foy, C. L. 1983. Compatibility of BAS 9052 OH with acifluorfen and bentazon. Weed Sci. 31:597599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatzios, K. K. and Penner, D. 1985. Interactions of herbicides with other agrochemicals in higher plants. Rev. Weed Sci. 1:163.Google Scholar
Johnson, B. C., Young, B. G., and Matthews, J. L. 2002. Effect of postemergence application rate and timing of mesotrione on corn (Zea mays) response and weed control. Weed Technol. 16:414420.Google Scholar
Mitchell, G., Bartlett, D. W., Fraser, T. E. M., Hawkes, T. R., Holt, D. C., Townson, J. K., and Wichert, R. A. 2001. Mesotrione: a new selective herbicide for use in maize. Pest Manag. Sci. 57:120128.Google Scholar
Mueller, T. C., Witt, W. W., and Barrett, M. 1989. Antagonism of johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) control with fenoxaprop, haloxyfop, and sethoxydim by 2,4-D. Weed Technol. 3:8689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, P. F. and Coble, H. D. 1992. Antagonism of graminicide activity on annual grass species by imazethapyr. Weed Technol. 6:333338.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. A., Renner, K. A., and Penner, D. 1998. Weed control in soybean (Glycine max) with imazamox and imazethapyr. Weed Sci. 46:587594.Google Scholar
Ohmes, G. A., Kendig, J. A., Barham, R. L., and Ezell, P. M. 2000. Efficacy of ZA 1296 in corn. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 53:225.Google Scholar
Olson, W. A. and Nalewaja, J. D. 1981. Antagonistic effects of MCPA on wild oat (Avena fatua) control with diclofop. Weed Sci. 29:566571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsey, F. L. and Schafer, D. W. 1997. The Statistical Sleuth: A Course in Methods of Data Analysis. Belmont, CA Duxbury. 9197.Google Scholar
Regehr, D. L., Peterson, D. E., Fick, W. H., Stahlman, P. W., and Wolf, R. E. 2007. Chemical Weed Control for Field Crops, Pastures, Rangeland, and Noncropland. Manhattan, KS. Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service, Report 977.Google Scholar
Schuster, C. L., Al-Khatib, K., and Dille, J. A. 2007. Mechanism of antagonism of mesotrione on sulfonylurea herbicides. Weed Sci. 55:429434.Google Scholar
Stephenson, D. O., Bond, J. A., Walker, E. R., Bararpour, M. T., and Oliver, L. R. 2004. Evaluation of mesotrione in Mississippi delta corn production. Weed Technol. 18:11111116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swanton, C. J., Chandler, K., Elmes, M. J., Murphy, S. D., and Anderson, G. W. 1996. Postemergence control of annual grasses and corn (Zea mays) tolerance using DPX-79406. Weed Technol. 10:288294.Google Scholar
Sweat, J. K., Horak, M. J., Peterson, D. E., Lloyd, R. W., and Boyer, J. E. 1998. Herbicide efficacy on four Amaranthus species in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 12:315321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[USDA] U. S. Department of Agriculture 2004. Pesticide and Herbicide Application Summary. National Agricultural Statistics Service, Economics Research Service. http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/usda/nass.com. Accessed: June 30, 2007.Google Scholar
[USDA] U. S. Department of Agriculture Agricultural Chemical Usage, Field Crops Summary. National Agricultural Statistics Service, Economics Research Service. 2006. http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/usda/nass.com. Accessed: June 30, 2007.Google Scholar
Waltz, A. L., Martin, A. R., and Spotanski, J. J. 1999. Weed control with ZA-1296 in field corn at Lincoln, NE in 1999. N. Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. Res. Rep. 56:228230.Google Scholar
Zhang, J., Hamill, A. S., and Weaver, S. E. 1995. Antagonism and synergism between herbicides: trends from previous studies. Weed Technol. 9:8690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar