Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T01:37:29.318Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hairy Nightshade Critical Interference Period in Potatoes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Pamela J. S. Hutchinson
Pamela J. S. Hutchinson*
Affiliation:
Plant, Soil, and Entomological Sciences Department, University of Idaho, Aberdeen Research and Extension Center, Aberdeen, ID 83210
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: phutch@uidaho.edu.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field research trials were conducted in Idaho at the Aberdeen Research and Extension Center in 2006 and 2007 to determine the critical interference period of hairy nightshade in potatoes. ‘Russet Norkotah’ variety was planted both years in plots three rows wide by 12 m long. When the potatoes had emerged, one- to two-leaf hairy nightshade plants that had been germinated and grown in the greenhouse were transplanted at a 2 m−1 row density and allowed to grow for 10, 20, 30, or 40 d after emergence (DAE) before removal, or the potatoes were maintained weed-free for 0, 10, 20, 30, or 40 DAE before transplanting. Potatoes were harvested from the center row at the end of each growing season and yield and grade was determined. Russet Norkotah is a small-canopied potato variety and often does not completely close canopy in Idaho. Russet Norkotah U.S. No. 1 and total tuber yield were similar to weed-free yield when hairy nightshade transplanting was delayed up to 22 or 24 DAE, respectively, or planted at emergence and allowed to remain for only 6 or 11 d, respectively. Otherwise, yield decrease was 5% or greater. Therefore, the critical weed-free period for Russet Norkotah potato U.S. No. 1 or total tuber yields was 6 to 22 or 11 to 24 DAE, respectively.

Se realizaron estudios de campo en Idaho en el Centro de Investigación y Extensión de Aberdeen en 2006 y 2007, para determinar el período crítico de interferencia de Solanum physalifolium en papa. La variedad ‘Russet Norkotah’ fue plantada en ambos años en lotes de tres hileras de ancho y 12 m de largo. Cuando las papas habían emergido, plantas de S. physalifolium de una a dos hojas, que habían sido germinadas y crecidas en invernaderos, fueron trasplantadas a una densidad de 2 m−1 y fueron crecidas por 10, 20, 30, ó 40 días después de la emergencia (DAE) antes de ser removidas, o las papas fueron mantenidas libres de malezas por 0, 10, 20, 30, ó 40 DAE antes del trasplante. Se cosecharon papas de la hilera central al final de cada temporada de producción y se determinó el rendimiento y la calidad. La variedad Russet Norkotah es de dosel pequeño y a menudo este dosel no cierra completamente en Idaho. Los rendimientos U.S. No. 1 y total de esta variedad fueron similares al testigo libre de malezas cuando el trasplante de S. physalifolium se atrasó hasta 22 ó 24 DAE, respectivamente, o cuando se trasplanto al momento de la emergencia del cultivo y se dejó solamente por 6 ó 11 d, respectivamente. De otra manera, la reducción del rendimiento fue 5% o mayor. Así, el período crítico libre de malezas para el rendimiento U.S. No. 1 y total de papa Russet Norkotah fue 0 a 66 y 11 a 24 DAE, respectivamente.

Keywords

Hairy nightshadeSolanum physalifolium Rusby SOLSApotato, Solanum tuberosum L. ‘Russet Norkotah’Time of removalweed-free period
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 28 , Issue 3 , September 2014 , pp. 543 - 551
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Allen, TC, Davis, JR (1982) Distribution of tobacco rattle virus and potato virus X in leaves, roots and fruits and/or seeds of naturally infected weeds. Am Potato J 59:149–153 Google Scholar
Alvarez, JM, Hutchinson, PJS (2005) Managing nightshade plants to reduce potato viruses and insect vectors. Outlooks Pest Manag 16:249–252 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, JM, Srinivasan, R (2005) Evaluation of hairy nightshade as an inoculum source for aphid-mediated transmission of potato leafroll virus. J Econ Entomol 98:1101–1108 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alvarez, JM, Stoltz, RM, Baird, CR, Sandvol, LE (2003) Insects and their management. Pages 205–239 in Stark, JC, Love, SL, eds. Potato Production Systems. Moscow, ID: University of Idaho Agriculture Commission Google Scholar
Basset, I J, Munro, DB (1985) The biology of Canadian weeds. 67. Solanum ptycanthum Dun., S. nigrum L. and S. sarrachoides Sendt. Can J Plant Sci 65:410–414 Google Scholar
Baziramakenga, R, Leroux, GD (1994) Critical period of quackgrass (Elytrigia repens) removal in potatoes (Solanum tuberosum). Weed Sci 42:528–533 Google Scholar
Bazirmakenga, R, Leroux, GD (1998) Economic and interference threshold densities of quackgrass (Elytrigia repens) in potato (Solanum tuberosum). Weed Sci 46:176–180 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackshaw, RE (1991) Hairy nightshade (Solanum sarrachoides) interference in dry beans (Phaseolus vulgaris). Weed Sci 39:48–53 Google Scholar
Ciuberkis, S, Bernotas, S, Raudonius, S, Felix, J (2007) Effect of weed emergence time and intervals of weed and crop competition on potato yield. Weed Technol 21:612–617 Google Scholar
Colquhoun, JB, Konieczka, CM, Rittmeyer, RA (2009) Ability of potato cultivars to tolerate and suppress weeds. Weed Technol 23:287–291 Google Scholar
Conley, SP, Binning, LK, Connell, TR (2001) Effect of cultivar, row spacing, and weed management on weed biomass, potato yield, and net crop value. Am J Potato Res 78:31–37 Google Scholar
Connell, TR, Binning, LK, Schmitt, WG (1999) A canopy development model for potatoes. Am J Potato Res 76:153–159 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawson, JH (1964) Competition between irrigated field beans and annual weeds. Weed Sci 12:206–208 Google Scholar
Eberlein, CV, Barkdoll, AW, Davis, JR (1991) Pathogenicity of Colletotrichum coccodes isolates to potato (Solanum tuberosum) and two nightshade (Solanum spp.) species. Weed Technol 5:570–574 Google Scholar
Eberlein, CV, Guttieri, MJ, Schaffers, WC (1992) Hairy nightshade (Solanum sarrachoides) control in potatoes (Solanum tuberosum) with bentazon plus additives. Weed Technol 6:85–90 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eberlein, CV, Patterson, PE, Guttieri, MJ, Stark, JC (1997) Efficacy and economics of cultivation for weed control in potato (Solanum tuberosum). Weed Technol 11:257–264 Google Scholar
Eberlein, CV, Whitmore, JC, Stanger, CE, Guttieri, MJ (1994) Postemergence weed control in potatoes (Solanum tuberosum) with rimsulfuron. Weed Technol 8:428–435 Google Scholar
Everaarts, A, Satsyati, (1978) Critical period for weed composition for potatoes in Java. Pages 173–177 in Proceedings of the Sixth Asian–Pacific Weed Science Society Conference. Jakarta, Indonesia The Asian-Pacific Weed Science Society Google Scholar
Fennimore, SA, Mitch, LW, Radosevich, SR (1984) Interference among bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli), and black nightshade (Solanum nigrum). Weed Sci 32:336–342 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hermanutz, LA, Weaver, SE (1991) Germination and growth of Solanum ptycanthum and Solanum sarrachoides . Can J Plant Sci 71:167–174 Google Scholar
Hutchinson, PJS (2005) Outlook herbicide for weed control in potatoes. CIS 1126. Moscow, ID: University of Idaho Education Commission. 4 pGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson PJS (2007a) A comparison of flumioxazin and rimsulfuron tank mixtures for weed control in potato. Weed Technol 21:1023–1028 Google Scholar
Hutchinson PJS (2007b) Chateau herbicide for use in potatoes. CIS 1136. Moscow, ID: University of Idaho Education Commission. 8 pGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, PJS, Beutler, BR, Farr, J (2011) Hairy nightshade (Solanum sarrachoides) competition with two potato varieties. Weed Sci 59:37–42 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, PJS, Beutler, BR, Hancock, DM (2006) Desiccant evaluations: late-season hairy nightshade (Solanum sarrachoides) control and seed response. Weed Technol 20:37–40 Google Scholar
Hutchinson, PJS, Beutler, B, Miera, C (2014) Linuron for weed control in potatoes—welcome back to the west! Am J Potato Res 91:50 [Abstract].Google Scholar
Hutchinson, PJS, Eberlein, CV (2003) Weed management. Pages 241–283 in Stark, JC and Love, SL, eds. Potato Production Systems Moscow, ID: Univ. of Idaho Ag. Comm.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, PJS, Eberlein, CV, Kral, CW, Guttieri, MJ (2005a). Using Matrix in weed management systems for potatoes. CIS 1037. Moscow, ID: University of Idaho Education Commission. 8 pGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, PJS, Eberlein, CV, Tonks, DJ (2004) Broadleaf weed control and potato (Solanum tuberosum) crop safety with postemergence rimsulfuron, metribuzin, and adjuvant combinations. Weed Technol 18:750–756 Google Scholar
Hutchinson, PJS, Morishita, DW, Price, WJ (2007) Season-long dose-response of potato to sulfometuron. Weed Sci 55:521–527 Google Scholar
Hutchinson, PJS, Ransom, CV, Boydston, RA, Beutler, BR (2005b) Dimethenamid-p: weed control and potato (Solanum tuberosum) variety tolerance. Weed Technol 19:966–971 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, PJS, Tonks, DJ, Beutler, BR (2003) Efficacy and economics of weed control programs in glyphosate-resistant potato (Solanum tuberosum). Weed Technol 17:854–865 Google Scholar
Ivany, JA (1981) Quackgrass (Agropyran repens) control with fall-applied glyphosate and other herbicides. Weed Sci 29:382–386 Google Scholar
Ivany, JA (1986) Quackgrass competition effect on potato yield. Can J Plant Sci 66:185–187 Google Scholar
Jaiswal, VP, Lal, SS (1996) Efficacy of cultural and chemical weed-control methods in potato (Solanum tuberosum). Indian J Agron 41:454–456 Google Scholar
Keeley, PE, Thullen, RJ (1989) Growth and competition of black nightshade (Solanum nigrum) and Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Sci 37:326–334 Google Scholar
Knezevic, SZ, Evans, SP, Blankenship, EE, Van Acker, RC, Lindquist, JL (2002) Critical period for weed control: the concept and data analysis. Weed Sci 50:773–786 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazauskas, J, Razukas, A (2001) Potato growing in Lithuania 1900–2000 years. Vilnius, Lithuania: Akademija. 92–100. [In Lithuanian]Google Scholar
Liebman, M, Drummond, FA, Corson, S, Zhang, J (1996) Tillage and rotation crop effects on weed dynamics in potato production systems. Agron J 88:18–26 Google Scholar
Love, SL, Eberlein, CV, Stark, JC, Bohl, WH (1995) Cultivar and seedpiece spacing effects on potato competitiveness with weeds. Am J Potato Res 72:197–213 Google Scholar
Love, SL, Noble, K, Parkinson, S (2009) Introduction to short-season gardening in Idaho. Bulletin 857. Moscow, ID: University of Idaho Education Commission. 4 pGoogle Scholar
Miller, TW, Parker, R (2006) Nightshade biology and control in the Pacific Northwest. PNW 0588. Corvallis, OR: Extension and Station Communications, Oregon State University. 8 pGoogle Scholar
Nelson, DC, Giles, JF (1989) Weed management in two potato (Solanum tuberosum) cultivars using tillage and pendimethalin. Weed Sci 37:228–232 Google Scholar
Nelson, DC, Thoreson, MC (1981) Competition between potatoes (Solanum tuberosum) and weeds. Weed Sci 29:672–677 Google Scholar
Nolte, P, Miller, JS, Geary, BD, Corsini, DL (2003) Disease management. Pages 153–183 in Stark, JC, Love, SL, eds. Potato Production Systems. Moscow, ID: University of Idaho Agricultural Commission.Google Scholar
Ogg, AG Jr., Dawson, JH (1984) Time of emergence of eight weed species. Weed Sci 32:327–335 Google Scholar
Ogg, AG Jr., Rogers, BS (1989) Taxonomy, distribution, biology, and control of black nightshade (Solanum nigrum) and related species in the United States and Canada. Rev Weed Sci 4:25–58 Google Scholar
Ogg, AG Jr., Rogers, BS, Schilling, BS (1981) Characterization of black nightshade (Solanum nigrum) and related species in the United States. Weed Sci 31:180–184 Google Scholar
Olanya, OM, Plant, AB, Larkin, RP and Honeycutt, CW (2009) Infection Potential of Hairy Nightshade (Solanum sarrachoides) by Phytophthora infestans and Late Blight Implications of the Alternate Host. J Phytopathol 157: 427–437 Google Scholar
Peachey, RE, Mallory-Smith, C (2007) Influence of winter seed position and recovery date on hairy nightshade (Solanum sarrachoides) recruitment and seed germination, dormancy, and mortality. Weed Sci 55:49–59 Google Scholar
Quakenbush, LS, Andersen, RN (1984) Distribution and biology of two nightshades (Solanum spp.) in Minnesota. Weed Sci 32:529–533 Google Scholar
Radosevich, SR, Holt, JS (1984) Weed Ecology: Implications for Vegetation Management. New York: John Wiley & Sons. 265 pGoogle Scholar
Roberts, HA, Boddrell, JE (1983) Field emergence and temperature requirements for germination in Solanum sarrachoides Sendt. Weed Res 23:247–252 Google Scholar
Saghir, AR, Markoullis, G (1974) Effects of weed competition and herbicides on yield and quality of potatoes. Pages 533–539 in Proceedings of the British Weed Control Conference. City, State Publisher. London, England: British Crop Protection Council Vol. 12 Google Scholar
Selleck, GW, Dallyn, SL (1978) Herbicide treatments and potato cultivar interactions. Pages 152–156 in Proceedings of the Northeastern Weed Science Society. Salisbury, MD: University of Maryland Vegetable Research Farm City, State: Publisher. Vol. 32:Google Scholar
Sharifi, M, Zebarth, BJ, Hajabbasi, MA, Kalbasi, M. (2005) Dry matter and nitrogen accumulation and root morphological characteristics of two clonal selections of ‘Russet Norkotah’ potato as affected by nitrogen fertilization. J Plant Nutr 28:2243–2253 Google Scholar
Singh, RD (2003) Evaluation of periods of weed free maintenance for mustard and potato in Sikkim. J. Farming System Research & Development. 9:105–107 Modipuram J. FRSDGoogle Scholar
Singh, M, Saxena, MC, Haddad, NI (1996) Estimation of critical period of weed control. Weed Sci 44:273–283 Google Scholar
Srinivasan, R, Alvarez, JM, Eigenbrode, SD, Bosque-Perez, NA (2006) Influence of hairy nightshade Solanum sarrachoides (Sendtner) and Potato leafroll virus (Luteoviridae: Polerovirus) on the host preference of Myzus persicae (Sulzer) (Homoptera: Aphididae). Environ Entomol 35:546–553 Google Scholar
Sweet, RD, Sieczka, JB (1973) Comments on ability of potato varieties to compete with weeds. Pages 302–304 in Proceedings of the Northeast Weed Science Society. Salisbury, MD: University of Maryland Vegetable Research Farm. Vol. 27 Google Scholar
Sweet, RD, Yip, CP, Sieczka, JB (1974) Crop cultivars: can they suppress weeds? New York's Food Life Sciences Quarterly 7:3–5 Google Scholar
Thakral, KK, Pandita, ML, Khurana, SC, Kalloo, G (1989) Effect of time of weed removal on growth and yield of potato. Weed Res 29:33–38 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[USDA–AMS] U.S. Department of Agriculture Agricultural Marketing Service (2008) United States Standards for Grades of Potatoes. Washington, DC: USDA–AMS. 15 pGoogle Scholar
VanGessel, MJ, Renner, KA (1990) Redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus) and Echinochloa crus-galli) interference in potatoes (Solanum tuberosum). Weed Sci 38:338–343 Google Scholar
Vitolo, DB, Ilnicki, RD (1985) Grass competition in white potatoes. Page 30 in Abstracts of the Weed Science Society of America. Lawrence, KS: Allen Press [Abstract]Google Scholar
Wall, DA, Friesen, GH (1990) Effect of duration of green foxtail (Setaria viridis) competition on potato (Solanum tuberosum) yield. Weed Technol 4:539–542 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, SE, Kropff, MJ, Groenveld, RMW (1992) Use of ecophysiological models for crop-weed interference: the critical period of weed interference. Weed Sci 40:302–307 Google Scholar
Webb, RE, Wilson, DR, Shumaker, JR, Graves, B, Henniger, MR, Watts, J, Frank, JA, Murphy, HJ (1978) Atlantic: a new potato variety with high solids, good processing, and resistance to pests. Am Potato J 55:141–145 Google Scholar
Yip, C, Sweet, R, Sieczka, J (1974) Competitive ability of potato cultivars with major weed species. Pages 271–281 in Proceedings of the Northeastern Weed Control Conference. Salisbury, MD: University of Maryland Vegetable Research Farm Vol. 28 Google Scholar
Zhou, J, Deckard, EL, Ahrens, WH (2005) Factors affecting germination of hairy nightshade (Solanum sarrachoides) seeds. Weed Sci 53:41–45 Google Scholar
Zimdahl, RL (1988) The concept and application of the critical weed-free period. Pages 145–155 in Altieri, MA, Liebman, M, eds. Weed Management in Agroecosystems: Ecological Approaches. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press Google Scholar
Zimdahl, R. L. 2004. Weed-Crop Competition, Second Edition. Ames, IA. Blackwell Pub. 220 p.Google Scholar