Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T10:39:50.225Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of Crownbeard (Verbesina encelioides) Densities on Peanut (Arachis hypogaea) Yield

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Rodney L. Farris  and
Don S. Murray
Rodney L. Farris
Affiliation:
Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078
Don S. Murray*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: dmurray@okstate.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted at the Caddo Research Station near Ft. Cobb, OK and at the Agronomy Research Station near Perkins, OK to measure the effects of seven crownbeard (Verbesina encelioides) densities on peanut (Arachis hypogaea) yield. The seven densities evaluated were 0 (the weed-free check), 0.2, 0.4, 0.8, 1.6, 2.4, and 3.2 weeds/m of row. Data collected consisted of dry weed biomass and peanut yields. Correlation between weed density and dry weed biomass, dry weed biomass and peanut yield (kg/ha), dry weed biomass and peanut yield loss (percentage of check), weed density and peanut yield (kg/ha), and weed density and peanut yield loss (percentage of check) were evaluated. For each weed/m of row, dry weed biomass increased by 0.34 kg/m row. Dry weed biomass was a good predictor of peanut yield. For each kilogram of dry weed biomass/ m row, a 1900-kg/ha or 46.3% reduction in peanut yield occurred. Weed density was also a good predictor of peanut yield. A 559-kg/ha reduction or 16% increase in peanut yield loss occurred for each weed/m row. Peanut yield was reduced approximately 50% when crownbeard density increased to 3.2 weeds/m row.

Keywords

Crownbeard, Verbesina encelioides (Cav.) Benth. & Hook. f. ex Gray #3 VEEENpeanut, Arachis hypogaea L.Competitiondry weed biomass
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 20 , Issue 3 , September 2006 , pp. 627 - 632
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Albers-Nelson, M. R., Murray, D. S., Verhalen, L. M., and Goad, C. L. 2000. Establishment techniques for common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium). Weed Technol. 14:463–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bensch, C. N., Horak, M. J., and Peterson, D. 2003. Interference of redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus), Palmer amaranth (A. Palmeri), and common waterhemp (A. Rudis) in soybean. Weed Sci. 51:37–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bridges, D. C., Brecke, B. J., and Barbour, J. C. 1992. Wild poinsettia (Euphorbia heterophylla) interference in peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Sci. 40:37–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardina, J. and Brecke, B. J. 1989. Growth and development of Florida beggarweed (Desmodium tortuosum) selections. Weed Sci. 37:207–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clewis, S. B., Askew, S. D., and Wilcut, J. W. 2001. Common ragweed interference in peanut. Weed Sci. 49:768–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, J. R. 1966. A taxonomic revision of section Ximenesia of the genus Verbesina L. (Compositae). Am. Midl. Nat. 76:475–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farris, R. L., Gray, C. J., Murray, D. S., and Verhalen, L. M. 2005. Time of removal of crownbeard (Verbesina encelioides) on peanut yield. Weed Technol. 19:380–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, J. D., Murray, D. S., and Verhalen, L. M. 1987. Full-season interference of silverleaf nightshade (Solanum eleagnifolium) with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Sci. 35:813–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grichar, W. J. and Sestak, D. C. 1998. Control of golden crownbeard (Verbesina encelioides) in peanut (Arachis hypogaea) with postemergence herbicides. Peanut Sci. 25:39–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hackett, N. M., Murray, D. S., and Weeks, D. L. 1987a. Interference of horsenettle (Solanum carolinense) with peanuts (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Sci. 35:780–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hackett, N. M., Murray, D. S., and Weeks, D. L. 1987b. Interference of silverleaf nightshade (Solanum elaeagnifolium) on Spanish peanuts (Arachis hypogaea). Peanut Sci. 14:39–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, L. V. and Santelmann, P. W. 1969. Competitive effects of annual weeds on Spanish peanuts. Weed Sci. 17:1–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inderjit, C. A. and Dakshini, K. M. M. 1999. Allelopathic potential of Verbesina encelioides root leachate in soil. Can. J. Bot. 77:1419–1424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaul, M. L. H. and Mangal, P. D. 1987. Phenology and germination of crownbeard (Verbesina encelioides). Weed Sci. 35:513–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keeler, R. F., Johnson, A. E., and Stuart, L. D. 1986. Toxicosis from and possible adaptation to Galega officinalis in sheep and the relationship to Verbesina encelioides toxicosis. Vet. Human Toxicol. 28:309–315.Google ScholarPubMed
Keeler, R. F., Baker, D. C., and Panter, K. E. 1992. Concentration of galegine in Verbesina encelioides and Galega officinalis and the toxic and pathologic effects induced by the plants. J. Environ. Pathol. Toxicol. Oncol. 11:75–81.Google ScholarPubMed
Lopez, T. A., Camero, C. M., Chayer, R., Cosentino, B., and Caracino, M. 1996. Experimental toxicity of Verbesina encelioides in sheep and isolation of galegine. Vet. Human Toxicol. 38:417–419.Google ScholarPubMed
McCoy, D. 1987. Oklahoma wildflowers. Oklahoma City, OK: Ebsco Graphics. P. 107.Google Scholar
Mitchell, F. L. and Smith, J. W. Jr. 1996. Influence of Verbesina encelioides (Asterales: Asteraceae) on thrips (Thysanoptera: Terebrantia) populations and tomato spotted wilt virus epidemics in south Texas peanut fields. Entomol. Soc. Am. 89:1593–1600.Google Scholar
[NPWRC] Native Wildflowers of the North Dakota Grasslands. 2001. United States Geological Survey. Web page: http://www.npwrc.usgs.gov/resource/literatr/wildflwr/species/vervence.html. Accessed: November 15, 2001.Google Scholar
[OALS] Office of Arid Lands Studies. 2001. Low Water Use and Drought Tolerant Plants: Annuals. Desert Research Unit. Web page: http://ag.arizona.edu/OALS/oals/dru/LWUannuals.html. Accessed: November 15, 2001.Google Scholar
[ODAFF] Oklahoma Department of Agriculture, Food, and Forestry. 2000. Top Oklahoma Agricultural Commodities. Web page: http://www.oda.state.ok.us/aghome.htm. Accessed: December 10, 2002.Google Scholar
Pawlak, J. A., Murray, D. S., and Smith, B. S. 1990. Influence of capsule age on germination of nondormant jimsonweed (Datura stramonium) seed. Weed Technol. 4:31–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radford, A. E., Ahles, H. E., and Bell, C. R. 1968. Manual of the vascular flora of the Carolinas. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press. Pp. 1118–1120.Google Scholar
Rogers, J. B., Murray, D. S., Verhalen, L. M., and Claypool, P. L. 1996. Ivyleaf morningglory (Ipomoea hederacea) interference with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Technol. 10:107–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowland, M. W., Murray, D. S., and Verhalen, L. M. 1999. Full-season Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) interference with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Sci. 47:305–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Royal, S. S., Brecke, B. J., and Colvin, D. L. 1997. Common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) interference with peanuts (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Sci. 45:38–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 2001. Software version 8e. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute.Google Scholar
Smith, B. S., Murray, D. S., and Weeks, D. L. 1990. Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) interference with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Technol. 4:799–803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[USDA-ESS] United States Department of Agriculture Economics and Statistics Service. 2002. National Agricultural Statistics Service—Field Crop Reports. Web page: http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/reports/nassr/field/pcp-bba/acrg0602.txt. Accessed: December 10, 2002.Google Scholar
[USDA-FSA] United States Department of Agriculture Farm Service Agency. 2005. Farm Service Agency—2002 State Acreage Detail Report: Oklahoma Peanuts. Report: Dw9200ca. Accessed (from USDA Database): October 12, 2005.Google Scholar
Walker, R. H., Wells, L. W., and McGuire, J. A. 1989. Bristly starbur (Acanthospermum hispidum) interference in peanuts (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Sci. 37:196–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, S. E. and Tan, C. S. 1983. Critical period of weed interference in tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum): Growth analysis. Weed Sci. 31:476–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, T. M. 2001. Weed survey—Southern states: Broadleaf crops subsection. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 54:244–259.Google Scholar
Wood, M. L., Murray, D. S., Westerman, R. B., Verhalen, L. M., and Claypool, P. L. 1999. Full-season interference of Ipomoea hederacea with Gossypium hirsutum . Weed Sci. 47:693–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yudin, L. S., Tabashnik, B. E., Cho, J. J., and Mitchell, W. C. 1988. Colonization of weeds and lettuce by thrips (Trysanoptera: Thripidae). Entomol. Soc. Am. 17:522–526.Google Scholar