Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T20:00:39.854Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Integrating Mechanical and Chemical Weed Management in Corn (Zea mays)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Jane Mt. Pleasant ,
Robert F. Burt  and
James C. Frisch
Jane Mt. Pleasant
Affiliation:
Dep. Soil. Crop Atmos. Sci., Cornell Univ., Ithaca NY 14853
Robert F. Burt
Affiliation:
Dep. Soil. Crop Atmos. Sci., Cornell Univ., Ithaca NY 14853
James C. Frisch
Affiliation:
Dep. Soil. Crop Atmos. Sci., Cornell Univ., Ithaca NY 14853
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Experiments conducted over three years compared weed cover and grain yields in corn which received cultivation alone, herbicide alone, and treatments combining mechanical and chemical weed control. Weed cover averaged 30% with cultivation alone compared to 9% for the other treatments. Grain yields were 7% lower in one year. In the cultivation-alone treatments the rolling cultivator was less effective in controlling weeds than the shovel/sweep cultivator. In-row weed cover was greater than between-row weed cover with cultivation alone. With banded herbicide plus cultivation, in and between-row weed cover was the same. Weed cover and grain yields following banded herbicide plus cultivation were equivalent to broadcast herbicide with or without cultivation.

Keywords

Corn, Zea mays L.Banded herbicidesbroadcast herbicidesshovel/sweep cultivatorcultivationin-row weed controlrolling cultivator
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 8 , Issue 2 , June 1994 , pp. 217 - 223
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bicki, T. J., Wax, L. M., and Sipp, S. K. 1991. Evaluation of reduced herbicide application strategies for weed control in coarse-textured soils. J. Prod. Agric. 4:516–519.Google Scholar
2. Devlin, D. L., Long, J. H., and Maddux, L. D. 1991. Using reduced rates of postemergence herbicides in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 5:834–840.Google Scholar
3. Gill, H. S., Brar, L. S., and Walia, U. S. 1984. Integrated weed control in maize. J. Res. Punjab Agric. Univ. 21:496–500.Google Scholar
4. Janke, R. R., Pleasant, J. Mt., Peters, S. E., and Bohlke, M. 1991. Long-term, low-input cropping systems research. P. 291–317 in Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education in the Field, Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
5. Johnson, R. R. 1985. A new look at cultivation. Crops Soils Mag. 37:13–16.Google Scholar
6. Meggitt, W. F. 1960. The influence of cultivation on corn yields when weeds are controlled by herbicides. Proc. Northeast. Weed Control Conf. 14:241–246.Google Scholar
7. Moomaw, R. S. 1972. Broadcast or banded chloramben with tillage variables in soybeans. Weed Sci. 20:502–506.Google Scholar
8. Moomaw, R. S. and Robison, L. R. 1973. Broadcast or banded atrazine plus propachlor with tillage variables in corn. Weed Sci. 21:106–109.Google Scholar
9. Nelson, D. C. and Giles, J. F. 1989. Weed management in two potato (Solanum tuberosum) cultivars using tillage and pendimethalin. Weed Sci. 37:228–232.Google Scholar
10. Samson, R. A. and Coulman, B. E. 1989. Herbicide banding, cultivation and interseeding as an integrated weed management system for corn. Proc. Annu. Northeast. Corn Improvement Conf. 44:33–38.Google Scholar
11. Shaw, D. R. and Coats, G. E. 1988. Herbicides and cultivation for sicklepod, Cassia obtusifolia, control in soybeans, Glycine max . Weed Technol. 2:187–190.Google Scholar
12. Sloneker, L. C. and Moldenhauer, W. C. 1977. Measuring the amounts of crop residue remaining after tillage. J. Soil Water Conserv. 32:231–236.Google Scholar