Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T02:20:48.657Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mechanical and Chemical Weed Control Systems for Kidney Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Orvin C. Burnside ,
Melvin J. Wiens ,
Norman H. Krause ,
Sanford Weisberg ,
Eric A. Ristau ,
Michelle M. Johnson  and
Rebecca A. Sheets
Orvin C. Burnside
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108
Melvin J. Wiens
Affiliation:
Central Minnesota Economic Development, Research and Education Center (CMEDREC), Staples, MN 56479
Norman H. Krause
Affiliation:
Central Minnesota Economic Development, Research and Education Center (CMEDREC), Staples, MN 56479
Sanford Weisberg
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Statistics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108
Eric A. Ristau
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108
Michelle M. Johnson
Affiliation:
CMEDREC, Staples, MN 56479
Rebecca A. Sheets
Affiliation:
CMEDREC, Staples, MN 56479
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Various chemical and mechanical weed control treatments for kidney bean production were evaluated on irrigated, sandy loam sites from 1993 to 1995 near Staples, MN. Weed biomass can be controlled either mechanically or chemically, but a combination of the two gave the most effective and dependable weed control over years. Good weed control by either mechanical or chemical means reduced white mold infection of dry bean because of better aeration of dry bean plants and thus less favorable conditions for infection. Dry bean seed yields were inversely related to weed yields, and weed competition was similar from indigenous stands of either grass or broadleaf weeds. Row cultivation was more effective than rotary hoeing for controlling weeds, reducing white mold infection of dry bean, and increasing dry bean seed yields.

Keywords

Kidney bean, Phaseolus vulgaris L. ‘Montcalm Red’white mold, Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (Lib.) deBaryCompetitiondry bean seed yieldherbicidesrotary hoerow cultivationsustainable crop productionCU, row cultivationPOST, postemergencePPI, preplant incorporatedPRE, preemergenceRH, rotary hoeWAP, weeks after planting
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , March 1998 , pp. 174 - 178
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Blackshaw, R. E., and Esau, R. 1991. Control of annual broadleaf weeds in pinto beans (<i>Phaseolus vulgaris</i>). Weed Technol. 5:532–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgert, K. L., Burnside, O. C., and Fenster, C. R. 1973. Black nightshade leaves its mark. Farm Ranch Home Q. 20:8–10.Google Scholar
Burnside, O. C., Ahrens, W. H., Holder, B. J., Wiens, M. J., Johnson, M. M., and Ristau, E. A. 1994. Efficacy and economics of various mechanical plus chemical weed control systems in dry beans (<i>Phaseolus vulgaris</i>). Weed Technol. 8:238–244.Google Scholar
Burnside, O. C., Krause, N. H., Wiens, M. J., Johnson, M. M., and Ristau, E. A. 1993. Alternative weed management systems for the production of kidney beans (<i>Phaseolus vulgaris</i>). Weed Technol. 7:940–945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnside, O. C., Wiens, M. J., Holder, B. J., Weisberg, S., Ristau, E. A., Johnson, M. M., and Cameron, J. H. 1998. Critical periods for weed control in dry beans (<i>Phaseolus vulgaris</i>). Weed Sci. In press.Google Scholar
Durgan, B. R., Gunsolus, J. L., Becker, R. L., and Dexter, A. G. 1997. Cultural and Chemical Weed Control in Field Crops—1997. BU-3157-F, Minnesota Extension Service. St. Paul, MN: University of Minnesota. 77 p.Google Scholar
Lamey, H. A., Zollinger, R. K., McBride, D. K., Venette, R. C., and Venette, J. R. 1991. Production problems and practices of northarvest dry bean growers in 1989. N. D. Farm Res. 49:17–24.Google Scholar
Meronuck, R. A., Hardman, L. L., and Lamey, H. A. 1993. Edible Bean Disease and Disorder Identification. North Central Regional Extension Publication No. 159, Minnesota Extension Service. St. Paul, MN: University of Minnesota. 4 p.Google Scholar
Urwin, C. P., Wilson, R. G., and Mortensen, D. A. 1996. Response of dry edible bean (<i>Phaseolus vulgaris</i>) cultivars to four herbicides. Weed Technol. 10:512–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, R. G. Jr., Wicks, G. A., and Fenster, C. R. 1980. Weed control in field beans (<i>Phaseolus vulgaris</i>) in western Nebraska. Weed Sci. 28:295–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zollinger, R. K., and Kells, J. J. 1993. Perennial sowthistle (<i>Sonchus arvensis</i>) interference in soybean (<i>Glycine max</i>) and dry edible bean (<i>Phaseolus vulgaris</i>). Weed Technol. 7:52–57.Google Scholar