Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T10:04:07.854Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Relative Safety of Preemergence Corn Herbicides Applied to Coarse-Textured Soil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 June 2017

Kurt M. Vollmer*
Affiliation:
Postdoctoral Researcher, Professor, Research Associate, and Research Associate, University of Delaware Carvel Research and Education Center, Georgetown, DE 19947
Mark J. VanGessel
Affiliation:
Postdoctoral Researcher, Professor, Research Associate, and Research Associate, University of Delaware Carvel Research and Education Center, Georgetown, DE 19947
Quintin R. Johnson
Affiliation:
Postdoctoral Researcher, Professor, Research Associate, and Research Associate, University of Delaware Carvel Research and Education Center, Georgetown, DE 19947
Barbara A. Scott
Affiliation:
Postdoctoral Researcher, Professor, Research Associate, and Research Associate, University of Delaware Carvel Research and Education Center, Georgetown, DE 19947
*
*Corresponding author’s E-mail: kvollmer@udel.edu

Abstract

Crop safety is an important consideration in determining PRE herbicide application, especially when multiple herbicide sites-of-action are used. This research examined relative corn injury as the result of PRE applications containing ALS- and/or HPPD-inhibiting herbicides to a sandy loam soil. Herbicide premixes containing clopyralid, flumetsulam, isoxaflutole, mesotrione, rimsulfuron, tembotrione, thifensulfuron, and thiencarbazone were applied at twice the labeled rate. In general, isoxaflutole alone was the safest herbicide evaluated, while PRE applications of rimsulfuron-containing herbicides caused the most corn stunting, had a lower recovery rate, and lower yields. However, POST applications of mesotrione plus rimsulfuron stunted corn less than 2%. Although there was little correlation between corn injury and yield, growers should be aware of the other factors, such as soil texture and environment that may impact crop production.

Type
Weed Management-Major Crops
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Associate Editor for this paper: Kevin Bradley, University of Missouri.

References

Literature Cited

Bunting, JA, Sprague, CL, Riechers, DE (2004) Corn tolerance as affected by the timing of foramsulfuron applications. Weed Technol 18:757762 Google Scholar
Curran, WA, Lingenfelter, DD, eds (2015) The Agronomy Guide: 2015–2016. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Google Scholar
Doohan, DJ, Ivany, JA, White, RP, Thomas, W (1998) Tolerance of early maturing corn (Zea mays) hybrids to DPX-79406. Weed Technol 12:4146 Google Scholar
Eberlein, CV, Rosow, KM, Geadelmann, JL, Openshaw, SJ (1989) Differential tolerance of corn genotypes to DPX-M6316. Weed Sci 37:651657 Google Scholar
Fuerst, EP, Gronwald, JW (1986) Induction of rapid metabolism of metolachlor in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) shoots by CGA-92194 and other antidotes. Weed Sci 34:354361 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, JM, Owen, MDK (2011) Herbicide resistant crops: utilities and limitations for herbicide-resistant weed management. J Agric Food Chem 58:58195829 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, JM, Ulrich, JF (1993) Response of corn (Zea mays L.) inbreds and hybrids to sulfonylurea herbicides. Weed Sci 41:508516 Google Scholar
Green, JM, Ulrich, JF (1994) Response of maize (Zea mays) inbreds and hybrids to rimsulfuron. Pestic Sci 40:187191 Google Scholar
Hatzios, KK, ed (1997) Regulation of Enzymatic Systems Detoxifying Xenobiotics in Plants. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer. 385 pGoogle Scholar
Hatzios, KK, Hoagland, RE, eds (1989) Crop Safeners for Herbicides. San Diego: Elsevier. 400 pGoogle Scholar
Isaacs, MA, Wilson, HP, Toler, JE (2002) Rimsulfuron plus thifensulfuron-methyl combinations with selected postemergence broadleaf herbicides in corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol 16:664668 Google Scholar
Janek, TW, Grichar, JW (2016) Weed control in corn (Zea mays L.) as influenced by preemergence herbicides. Intern J Agron. doi: 2016:10.1155/2016/2607671 Google Scholar
Lamoureux, GL, Rusness, DG (1992) The mechanism of action of BAS 145 138 as a safener for chlorimuron ethyl in corn: effect on hydroxylation, glutathione conjugation, glucoside conjugation, and acetolactate synthase. Pestic Biochem Physiol 42:128139 Google Scholar
Martini, LF, Burgos, NR, Noldin, JA, de Avila, LA, Salas, RA (2014) Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of bispyribac-sodium on rice seedlings under cold stress. Pest Mgmt Sci 71:10211029 Google Scholar
Ritter, RL, Menbere, H (2001) Preemergence and postemergence control of triazine-resistant common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) in no-till corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol 15:879884 Google Scholar
Rodriguez, VM, Soengas, P, Alonso-Villaverde, V, Sotelo, T, Cartea, ME, Velasco, P (2015) Effect of temperature stress on the early vegetative development of Brassica oleracea L. BMC Plant Biol 15. doi: 10.1186/s12870-015-0535-0 Google Scholar
Shaner, G, Finney, RE (1977) The effect of nitrogen fertilization on the expression of slow-mildewing resistance in Knox wheat. Phytopath 67:10511056 Google Scholar
Sprague, CL, Penner, D, Kells, JJ (1999) Enhancing the margin of selectivity of RPA 201772 in Zea mays with antidotes. Weed Sci 47:492497 Google Scholar
Thelen, KD, Penner, D (2007) Yield environment affects glyphosate resistant hybrid response to glyphosate. Crop Sci 47:20982107 Google Scholar
Tooley, PW, Grau, CR (1984) Field characterization of rate-reducing resistance to Phytophthora megasperma f. sp. glycinea in soybean. Phytopath 74:12011208 Google Scholar
Tursun, N, Dalta, A, Sakinmaz, MS, Kantarci, Z, Knezevic, SZ, Chauhan, BS (2016) The critical period for weed control in three corn (Zea mays L.) types. Crop Prot 90:5965 Google Scholar
[USDA] United States Department of Agriculture National Agriculture Statistics Service (2014) Agricultural Chemical Use Survey-Corn Highlights. https://www.nass.usda.gov/Surveys/Guide_to_NASS_Surveys/Chemical_Use/2014_Corn_Highlights/. Accessed January 23, 2017Google Scholar
VanGessel, MJ, Johnson, QR, Scott, BA (2016) Evaluating postemergence herbicides, safener, and tolerant corn hybrids for corn response. Weed Technol 30:869877 Google Scholar
Viger, PR, Eberlein, CV, Fuerst, P, Gronwald, JW (1991) Effects of CGA-154281 and temperature on metolachlor absorption and metabolism, glutathione content, and glutathione-s-transferase activity in corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci 39:324328 Google Scholar
Walsh, KD, Soltani, N, Shropshire, C, Sikkema, PH (2015) Weed control in soybean with imazethapyr applied alone or in tank mix with saflufenacil/dimethanamid-P. Weed Sci 63:329335 Google Scholar
Wicks, GA, Knezevic, SZ, Bernards, M, Wilson, RG, Klein, RN, Martin, AR (2007) Effect of planting depth and isoxaflutole rate on corn stunting in Nebraska. Weed Technol 21:642646 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, MM, Pataky, JK (2010) Factors affecting differential sensitivity of sweet corn to HPPD-inhibiting herbicides. Weed Sci 58:289294 Google Scholar
Younesabadi, M, Das, TK, Pandey, R (2013) Effect of herbicide tank-mixes on weed control, yield, and physiological parameters of soybean (Glycine max) under tilled and no-tilled conditions. Indian J Plant Physiol 18:290294 Google Scholar