Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T00:25:09.611Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Seeded Watermelon and Weed Response to Halosulfuron Applied Preemergence and Postemergence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Andrew W. Macrae ,
A. Stanley Culpepper ,
Roger B. Batts  and
Kenneth L. Lewis
Andrew W. Macrae*
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, University of Georgia, Tifton, GA 31794
A. Stanley Culpepper
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, University of Georgia, Tifton, GA 31794
Roger B. Batts
Affiliation:
Department of Horticultural Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7609
Kenneth L. Lewis
Affiliation:
Southwest District–CES, University of Georgia, Tifton, GA 31794
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: E-mail: awmacrae@uga.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Managing weeds in watermelon is challenging because of the limited availability of herbicides approved for use in this crop. Field experiments on efficacy and crop tolerance were conducted to determine the potential for halosulfuron use in watermelon in Georgia and North Carolina. Halosulfuron was applied PRE, early POST (EPOST; one-leaf watermelon), and late POST (LPOST; watermelon with 30-cm runners) at 26, 39, and 52 g ai/ha. Under weed-free conditions, PRE treatments did not injure watermelon. EPOST and LPOST treatments caused 45 and 34% injury 2 wk after treatment, respectively, averaged over halosulfuron rate. EPOST treatments reduced watermelon fruit number and total weight by 15 and 22%, respectively, and LPOST treatments reduced total fruit weight 12%. Halosulfuron PRE at 39 or 52 g/ha provided 94% or greater control of carpetweed, Palmer amaranth, and smooth pigweed. EPOST treatments controlled 84 and 88% of yellow nutsedge and smooth pigweed, respectively, but LPOST treatments controlled less than 83% of all weed species. Sequential applications of halosulfuron at 26 g/ha PRE and 26 g/ha LPOST controlled 89 to 99% of carpetweed, coffee senna, Palmer amaranth, smooth pigweed, and yellow nutsedge. Our data suggest growers can effectively use halosulfuron PRE in seeded watermelon. However, POST applications should be made only after watermelon has 30-cm runners and as a salvage spot treatment where previous weed control strategies have failed to provide adequate control.

Keywords

Halosulfuroncarpetweed, Mollugo verticillata L. MOLVEcoffee senna, Cassia occidentalis (L.) Link CASOCPalmer amaranth, Amaranthus palmeri S. Wats. AMAPAsmooth pigweed, Amaranthus hybridus L. AMACHyellow nutsedge, Cyperus esculentus L. CYPESwatermelon, Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum. & Nakai ‘Legacy’, ‘Sangria’, ‘Stargazer’Growth stageinjurytoleranceweed controlyield
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 22 , Issue 1 , March 2008 , pp. 86 - 90
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Ackley, J. A., Wilson, H. P., and Hines, T. E. 1996. Yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) control POST with acetolactate synthase-inhibiting herbicides. Weed Technol. 10:576–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blum, R. R., Isgrigg, J. III, and Yelverton, F. H. 2000. Purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus) and yellow nutsedge (C. esculentus) control in bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon) turf. Weed Technol. 14:357–365.Google Scholar
Brandenberger, L. P., Shrefler, J. W., Webber, C. L. III, Talbert, R. E., Payton, M. E., Wells, L. K., and McClelland, M. 2005a. Preemergence weed control in direct-seeded watermelon. Weed Technol. 19:706–712.Google Scholar
Brandenberger, L. P., Talbert, R. E., Wiedenfeld, R. P., Shrefler, J. W., Webber, C. L. III, and Malik, M. S. 2005b. Effects of halosulfuron on weed control in commercial honeydew crops. Weed Technol. 19:346–350.Google Scholar
Brown, D. and Masiunas, J. 2002. Evaluation of herbicides for pumpkin (Cucurbita spp.). Weed Technol. 16:282–292.Google Scholar
Buker, R. S. III, Rathinasabapathi, B., Stall, W. M., MacDonald, G., and Olson, S. M. 2004. Physiological basis for differential tolerance of tomato and pepper to rimsulfuron and halosulfuron: site of action study. Weed Sci. 52:201–205.Google Scholar
Buker, R. S. III, Stall, W. M., and Olson, S. M. 1997. Watermelon tolerance to halosulfuron applied preemergence and postemergence. Proc. Fla. State Hortic. Soc. 110:323–325.Google Scholar
Buker, R. S. III, Stall, W. M., Olson, S. M., and Schilling, D. G. 2003. Season-long interference of yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) with direct-seeded and transplanted watermelon (Citrullus lanatus). Weed Technol. 17:751–754.Google Scholar
Earl, H. J., Ferrell, J. A., Vencill, W. K., van Iersel, M. W., and Czarnota, M. A. 2004. Effects of three herbicides on whole-plant carbon fixation and water use by yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus). Weed Sci. 52:213–216.Google Scholar
Ferrell, J. A., Earl, H. J., and Vencill, W. K. 2004. Duration of yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) competitiveness after herbicide treatment. Weed Sci. 52:24–27.Google Scholar
Flanders, J. T. and Culpepper, A. S. 2002. Eggplant response to topical and precision-directed applications of Sandea (halosulfuron). Pages 51–52. in Kelley, W. T., editor. Proceedings of 2002 Georgia Vegetable Conference. Tifton, GA University of Georgia and Georgia Fruit and Vegetable Growers’ Association.Google Scholar
Frans, R. E., Talbert, R., Marx, D., and Crowley, H. 1986. Experiment design and techniques for measuring and analyzing plant responses to weed control practices. Pages 29–46. in Camper, N. D., editor. Research Methods in Weed Science. 3rd ed. Champaign, IL Southern Weed Science Society.Google Scholar
Grichar, W. J., Besler, B. A., and Brewer, K. D. 2003. Purple nutsedge control and potato (Solanum tuberosum) tolerance to sulfentrazone and halosulfuron. Weed Technol. 17:485–490.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. C. III and Mullinix, B. G. Jr. 2005. Effect of herbicide application method on weed management and crop injury in transplanted cantaloupe production. Weed Technol. 19:108–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monks, D. W. and Schultheis, J. R. 1998. Critical weed-free period for large crabgrass (Digitaria sanguinalis) in transplanted melon. Weed Sci. 46:530–532.Google Scholar
[NCDA & CS] North Carolina Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services 2004. North Carolina Agricultural Statistics 2004. Raleigh, NC North Carolina Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services and the U.S. Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. A. and Renner, K. A. 2002. Yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) control and tuber production with glyphosate and ALS-inhibiting herbicides. Weed Technol. 16:512–519.Google Scholar
SAS 2005 SAS/STAT User's Guide. Release 9.1.3, Service Pack 2. Cary, NC SAS Institute.Google Scholar
Starke, K. D., Monks, D. W., Mitchem, W. E., and MacRae, A. W. 2006. Response of five summer squash (Cucurbita pepo) cultivars to halosulfuron. Weed Technol. 20:617–621.Google Scholar
Terry, E. R., Stall, W. M., Shilling, D. G., Bewick, T. A., and Kostewicz, S. R. 1997. Smooth amaranth (Amaranthus hybridus L.) interference with watermelon (Citrullus lanatus L.) and muskmelon (Cucumis melo L.) production. Hortic. Sci. 32:620–632.Google Scholar
Wallinder, C. J. and Talbert, R. E. 1983. Goosegrass interference with watermelon growth. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 36:158.Google Scholar
Walters, S. A., Nolte, S. A., and Young, B. G. 2005. Influence of winter rye and preemergence herbicides on weed control in no-tillage zucchini squash production. Hortic. Technol. 15:238–243.Google Scholar
Webster, T. M. 2006. Weed survey: southern states: vegetable, fruit, and nut crops subsection. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 59:260–277.Google Scholar
Webster, T. M. and Culpepper, A. S. 2005. Halosulfuron has a variable effect on cucurbit growth and yield. Hortic. Sci. 40:707–710.Google Scholar
Webster, T. M., Culpepper, A. S., and Johnson, W. C. III. 2003. Response of squash and cucumber cultivars to halosulfuron. Weed Technol. 17:173–176.Google Scholar