Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T10:15:51.581Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Technology Transfer for Herbicide-Tolerant Weeds and Herbicide-Tolerant Crops

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Ellery L. Knake*
Affiliation:
Univ. of Ill., Urbana, IL 61801

Abstract

Weed resistance has not generally been considered a serious problem where herbicide rotations and combinations are used. Herbicide-tolerant crops present new opportunities for decreasing risk of crop injury, decreasing carryover problems, broadening control spectrum, and for using herbicides that present less risk to the environment. However, herbicide-tolerant crops that allow intensified use of some herbicides may allow tolerant weed species to proliferate and herbicide carryover problems to increase for certain crops. Those responsible for the technology transfer process will need to keep well informed and objectively provide clientele with the basis for appropriate decisions as new weed control systems are designed as a result of these developments.

Type
Symposium
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Barreto, C. L. and Fay, P. K. 1983. Use of selected communication techniques in a statewide weed awareness program. J. Agron. Educ. 12:1721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Brown, T. G. and Collins, A. J. 1978. Large commercial family farms informational needs and sources. A report of the Natl. Ext. Study Comm., Agric. Econ. Dept., Univ. of Mo., Columbia, MO.Google Scholar
3. Duvick, D. N. 1982. Training agronomists to meet projected opportunities in the private sector. J. Agron. Educ. 11:6770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Eno, C. F. 1984. The next big step-improving the communicative skills of agronomists. Agron. J. 76:175177.Google Scholar
5. Fucillo, D. A. and Book, V. A. 1984. Promoting good communication in Agronomy, crops, and soils. J. Agron. Educ. 13:3942.Google Scholar
6. Gressel, J. and Segel, L. A. 1978. The paucity of plants evolving genetic resistance to herbicides: possible reasons and implications. J. Theor. Biol. 75:349371.Google Scholar
7. Gressel, J. and Segel, L. A. 1990. Herbicide rotations and mixtures. Effective strategies to delay resistance. Am. Chem. Soc. Symp. Ser. 421:430458.Google Scholar
8. King, R. P., Lybecker, D. W., Schweizer, E. E., and Zimdahl, R. L. 1986. Bioeconomic modeling to simulate weed control strategies for continuous corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 34:972979.Google Scholar
9. Knake, E. L. 1987. Training weed scientists for Extension. Weed Technol. 1:181183.Google Scholar
10. LeBaron, H. M. and Gressel, J. 1982. Herbicide Resistance in Plants. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, NY.Google Scholar
11. LeBaron, H. M. 1983. Herbicide resistance in plants–an overview. Weeds Today 14:2:46.Google Scholar
12. LeBaron, H. M. 1984. Herbicide resistance in plants–future research needs. Weeds Today 15:4:25.Google Scholar
13. Mallory-Smith, C. A., Dial, M. J., and Thill, D. C. 1989. Inheritance of sulfonylurea herbicide resistance in prickly lettuce (Lactuca serriola L.). Proc. West. Soc. Weed Sci. 42:39.Google Scholar
14. Pike, D. R., Knake, E. L., Kuhlman, D. E., McGlamery, M. D., and Pataky, N. R. 1990. Pesticide use in Illinois: results of a 1988 survey of major crops. CES Circ. 1301, Coll. of Agric., Univ. of Ill. 26 p.Google Scholar
15. Reisbeck, R. F. 1980. Toward more effective newsletters. J. Ext. 18:1417.Google Scholar
16. Roush, M. L., Radosevich, S. R., and Maxwell, B. D. 1990. Future outlook for herbicide-resistance research. Weed Technol. 4:208214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar