Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T01:51:51.720Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tolerance of Processing Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) Varieties to Halosulfuron-methyl

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 March 2017

Mohsen Mohseni-Moghadam Open the ORCID record for Mohsen Mohseni-Moghadam [Opens in a new window]  and
Douglas Doohan
Mohsen Mohseni-Moghadam
Affiliation:
Research Associate, The Center for Applied Genetic Technologies, University of Georgia, 111 Riverbend Road, Athens, GA 30602
Douglas Doohan*
Affiliation:
Professor, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Department of Horticulture and Crop Science, Ohio State University, 1680 Madison Avenue, Wooster, OH 44691
*
*Corresponding author’s E-mail: doohan.1@osu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted at the Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center in Wooster, OH in 2002 and 2004 to evaluate the tolerance of tomato varieties to halosulfuron-methyl, a selective herbicide used for POST control of broadleaf weeds and nutsedge (Cyperus). POST herbicide treatments included halosulfuron-methyl at 0, 34.7 and 70 gaiha−1. Plots were evaluated at 1, 3, and 6 wk after treatment (WAT), and yield was recorded at the end of the season. Minimal crop injury was observed 1 and 3 WAT in plots treated with both halosulfuron-methyl rates only in 2002. Although the crop recovered from herbicide injury when treated with the lower rate at 6 WAT, ‘Ohio 8245’, ‘M82’, and ‘E6203’ showed injury at this interval when treated with halosulfuron-methyl at 70 g ha−1. No injury was observed with either rates in 2004. No significant yield reduction was observed in any of the varieties in the test plots. These results indicate that differential tolerance to halosulfuron-methyl does not exists among these tomato varieties with the exception of E6203 and M82.

Keywords

Halosulfurontomato, Solanum lycopersicum L.Crop tolerance
Type
Weed Management-Other Crops/Areas
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 31 , Issue 3 , June 2017 , pp. 430 - 435
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Associate Editor for this paper: Darren Robinson, University of Guelph.

References

Literature Cited

Ackley, JA, Henry, PW, Thomas, EH (1997) Rimsulfuron and metribuzin efficacy in transplanted tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum). Weed Technol 11:324–328 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adigun, JA, Lagoke, ST, Karikari, SK (1991) Chemical weed control in irrigated sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). Trop Pest Manag 37:155–158 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anonymous. (2015) Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center Weather System. http://www.oardc.ohio-state.edu/newweather/dailyinfo.asp?id=1. Accessed June 15, 2015Google Scholar
Boyd, N (2015) Evaluation of preemergence herbicides for purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus) control in tomato. Weed Technol 29:480–487 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckelew, JK, Monks, DW, Jennings, KM, Hoyt, GD, Walls, RF (2006) Eastern black nightshade (Solanum ptycanthum) reproduction and interference in transplanted plasticulture tomato. Weed Sci 54:490–495 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carmer, SG, Nyquist, WE, Walker, WM (1989) Least significant differences for combined analyses of experiments with two- and three- factor treatment designs. Agron J 81:665–672 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devkota, P, Norsworthy, JK, Rainey, R (2013) Efficacy and economics of herbicide programs compared to methyl bromide for weed control in polyethylene-mulched tomato. Weed Technol 27:580–589 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garvey, PV, Meyers, SL, Monks, DW (2013) Influence of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) on the critical period for weed control in plasticulture-grown tomato. Weed Technol 27:165–170 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilreath, JP, Santos, BM (2004) Efficacy of methyl bromide alternatives on purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus) control in tomato and pepper. Weed Technol 18:341–345 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isik, D, Kaya, E, Ngouajio, M, Mennan, H (2009) Weed suppression in organic pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) with winter cover crops. Crop Prot 28:356–363 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennings, KM (2010) Tolerance of fresh-market tomato to postemergence-directed imazosulfuron, halosulfuron, and trifloxysulfuron. Weed Technol 24:117–120 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lament, WJ (1993) Plastic mulches for the production of vegetable crops. Hort Technol 3:35–39 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masiunas, JB, Weston, LA, Weller, SC (1995) The impact of rye cover crops on weed populations in a tomato cropping system. Weed Sci 43:318–323 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[NASS] National Agricultural Statistics Service. (2015) Statistics by Subject. http://www.nass.usda.gov/Statistics_by_Subject/index.php. Accessed June 15, 2015Google Scholar
Norsworthy, JK, Oliveira, MJ, Jha, P, Malik, M, Buckelew, JK, Jennings, KM, Monks, DW (2008) Palmer amaranth and large crabgrass growth with plasticulture-grown bell pepper. Weed Technol 22:296–302 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qiao, K, Dong, S, Wang, H, Xia, X, Ji, X, Wang, K (2012) Effectiveness of 1, 3-dichloropropene as an alternative to methyl bromide in rotations of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) and cucumber (Cucumis sativus) in China. Crop Prot 38:30–34 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rankins, A, Evans, WB, Shankle, MW, Cushman, KE (2004) Tolerance of selected tomato varieties to postemergence applications of Sandea. Page 141 in Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Southern Weed Science Society. Memphis, TN: Weed Science Society of AmericaGoogle Scholar
Robinson, DE, Soltani, N, Hamill, AS, Sikkema, PH (2006) Weed control in processing tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) with rimsulfuron and thifensulfuron applied alone or with chlorothalonil or copper pesticides. HortScience 41:1295–1297 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, DC, Cook, WP, Cranberry, D (1996) Plasticulture of Commercial Vegetables. North Carolina State University, North Carolina Cooperative Extension Services Pub. AG–489Google Scholar
Sim, SC, Robbins, MD, Van Deynze, A, Michel, AP, Francis, DM (2011) Population structure and genetic differentiation associated with breeding history and selection in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Heredity 106:927–935 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sim, SC, Van Deynze, A, Stoffel, K, Douches, DS, Zarka, D (2012) High-density SNP genotyping of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) reveals patterns of genetic variation due to breeding. PLoS ONE 7:1–18 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Soltani, N, Robinson, DE, Hamill, AS, Bowley, S, Sikkema, PH (2005) Tolerance of processing tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) to thifensulfuron-methyl. Weed Technol 19:669–673 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trader, BW, Wilson, HP, Hagood, ES, Hines, TE (2009) Halosulfuron resistance in smooth pigweed (Amaranthus hybridus) populations. Weed Technol 23:460–464 CrossRefGoogle Scholar