Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T05:56:19.570Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tolerance of Sweet Corn (Zea mays) to Clopyralid and EF-689

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

John B. Masiunas  and
Michael S. Orfanedes
John B. Masiunas
Affiliation:
Dep. Hortic., Univ. IL 1201 W. Gregory Dr., Urbana, IL 68101
Michael S. Orfanedes
Affiliation:
Dep. Hortic., Univ. IL 1201 W. Gregory Dr., Urbana, IL 68101
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Two experiments were conducted. The first experiment compared sweet corn tolerance to clopyralid at 0.2 to 1.1 kg ha-1, EF-689 at 0.07 to 0.6 kg ha-1 and 2,4-D at either 0.3 or 0.6 kg ha-1. Sweet corn tolerated all rates of clopyralid. EF-689 at 0.2 kg ha-1 or greater caused stalk curvature, stunting, and yield reductions. Stalk curvature also resulted from 2,4-D, but not stunting or yield reductions. The second experiment determined the effect of sweet corn genotype and growth stage at application on injury from EF-689. Injury was genotype and growth stage dependent. Stalk curvature was most severe from treatments 6 wk after emergence, whereas the greatest stunting was from treatments at 4 wk. ‘Supreme’ had the least and ‘Maple Sweet’ the most stalk curvature.

Keywords

Clopyralid, 3,6-dichloro-2-pyridine-carboxylic acidEF-689, 4-amino-3,5-dichloro-6-fluoro-2-pyridyloxyacetic acid2,4-D, (2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acidsweet corn, Zea mays L.Growth regulators2,4-D
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 5 , Issue 2 , June 1991 , pp. 376 - 380
Copyright
Copyright © 1991 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Breeze, V. G. 1988. Growth of tomato plants following exposure to fluroxypyr vapour. Weed Res. 28:297–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Breeze, V. G., and West, C. J. 1987. Long and short-term effects of the herbicide 2,4-D butyl on growth of tomato plants. Pestic. Sci. 22: 251–261.Google Scholar
3. Bovey, R. W., Hein, H. Jr., Keeney, F. N., and Whisenant, S. G. 1990. Phytotoxicity and transport of clopyralid from three formulations in honey mesquite. J. Plant Growth Regul. 9:65–69.Google Scholar
4. Dearborn, C. H., Sweet, R. D., and Harvis, J. R. 1948. Weeding sweet corn with 2,4-D: effects of timing, rates, and varieties. Proc. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci 51:536–540.Google Scholar
5. Harvey, R. G., Kleppe, C. D., and Morton, C. A. 1989. Annual weed control in field and sweet corn studies. North Cent., Weed Sci. Soc. Res. Rep. 46:329–332.Google Scholar
6. Harvey, R. G., and Kutil, J. L. 1988. Annual broadleaf weed control in corn study. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. Res. Rep. 45:327–328.Google Scholar
7. Kintner, D. E., and Jentes, C. E. 1989. Evaluation of fluroxypyr and triclopyr for control of problem perennial weeds in field corn. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. Proc. 44:31–32.Google Scholar
8. Kloppenbury, D. J., and Hall, J. C. 1990. Efficacy of five different formulations of clopyralid on Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. and Polygonum convolvulus L. Weed Res. 30:227–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Knake, E. L., Wesley, L. D., and Paul, L. E. 1989. Multi-species evaluation of postemergence herbicides. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. Res. Rep. 46:150–154.Google Scholar
10. Orfanedes, M. S. 1990. An investigation into the differential response of hemp dogbane (Apocynum cannabinum L.) to two pyridine herbicides. Ph.D. Thesis. Univ. of Illinois, Urbana.Google Scholar
11. Owen, M.D.K., Lux, J. F., and Franzenburg, E. L. 1988. Fluroxypyr and triclopyr postemergence applications for weed control in corn, No. 6, Ames, Iowa. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. Res. Rep. 45:369–371.Google Scholar
12. Owen, M.D.K., Lux, J. F., and Franzenburg, E. L. 1989. Fluroxypyr and triclopyr herbicides applied postemergence for weed control in corn. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. Res. Rep. 46:322–323.Google Scholar
13. Roberts, H. A., and Bond, W. 1985. Evaluation of fluroxypyr for weed control in drilled vegetable crops. Ann. Appl. Biol. 106:96–97.Google Scholar
14. Rodgers, E. G. 1952. Brittleness and other responses of corn to 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid. Plant Physiol. 27:153–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Rossman, E. C., and Staniforth, D. W. 1949. Effects of 2,4-D on inbred lines and a single cross of maize. Plant Physiol. 24:60–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Staniforth, D. W. 1952. Effect of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid on meristematic tissues of corn. Plant Physiol. 27:803–811.Google Scholar