Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T06:35:55.466Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Using the Rosette Technique for Canada Thistle (Cirsium arvense) Control in Row Crops

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Brett R. Miller
Affiliation:
Plant Science Department, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105
Rodney G. Lym
Affiliation:
Plant Science Department, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105

Abstract

Clopyralid applied to Canada thistle rosettes has provided better control in the following growing season than applications to bolted plants. The objectives of this research were to determine if using cultivation to prevent plants from bolting prior to herbicide application (the rosette technique) could be successfully incorporated into a row crop production system and to evaluate the effect of Canada thistle growth stage on the absorption and translocation of 14C-clopyralid. Canada thistle control 8 mo after postharvest herbicide treatment (MAFT) using the rosette technique was similar to control when using conventional in-crop plus postharvest herbicide treatments in corn and soybean. Glyphosate and clopyralid plus 2,4-D were the most consistent postharvest herbicide treatments for Canada thistle control 8 MAFT in corn and soybean. Corn yields were similar, but soybean yields were slightly lower when Canada thistle was controlled using cultivation compared to conventional herbicide treatments. 14C-clopyralid translocation to Canada thistle roots and lower shoot parts was greater when clopyralid was applied to the rosette stage than when applied to bolted Canada thistle plants. The increased translocation probably accounts for the increased Canada thistle control observed in the field. Incorporating the rosette technique into a weed management program should allow growers to control Canada thistle with less herbicide input than do standard practices.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Bixler, L. L., Cooley, A. W., and Carrithers, V. F. 1991. Canada thistle control at two stages of plant growth with clopyralid. Proc. West. Soc. Weed Sci. 44:4447.Google Scholar
Boerboom, C. M. and Wyse, D. L. 1988. Response of Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) and birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus) to bentazon. Weed Sci. 36:250253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elakkad, M. A. and Behrens, R. 1975. Canada thistle competition with corn and soybeans. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 30:114.Google Scholar
Elakkad, M. A. and Behrens, R. 1976. Factors in Canada thistle competition with corn and soybeans. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 31:141142.Google Scholar
Haderlie, L. C., McAllister, R. S., Hoefer, R. H., and Leino, P. W. 1991. Canada thistle control. In James, L. F., Evans, J. O., Ralphs, M. H., and Child, R. D., eds. Noxious Range Weeds. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. pp. 260263.Google Scholar
Hunter, J. H. 1994. Control of Canada thistle—a review of the rosette technique. Proc. West. Soc. Weed Sci. 47:65.Google Scholar
Hunter, J. H. 1995. Effect of bud vs rosette growth stage on translocation of 14C-glyphosate in Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense). Weed Sci. 43:347351.Google Scholar
O'Sullivan, P. A. and Kossatz, V. C. 1984. Absorption and translocation of 14C-3,6-dichloropicolinic acid in Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. Weed Res. 24:1722.Google Scholar
Thorsness, K. B. 1991. Fate of Pyridinecarboxylic Acid Herbicides in Soil and Canada Thistle (Cirsium arvense). . North Dakota State University, Fargo. (Diss. Abstr. 53-04B, p. 1665).Google Scholar
Turnbull, G. C. and Stephenson, G. R. 1985. Translocation of clopyralid and 2,4-D in Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense). Weed Sci. 33:143147.Google Scholar