Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T08:33:36.011Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Absorption, Translocation, and Metabolism of Rimsulfuron in Black Nightshade (Solanum nigrum), Eastern Black Nightshade (Solanum ptycanthum), and Hairy Nightshade (Solanum sarrachoides)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

John A. Ackley
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Pathology, Physiology, and Weed Science, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061-0331 and Painter, VA 23420
Kriton K. Hatzios*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Pathology, Physiology, and Weed Science, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061-0331 and Painter, VA 23420
Henry P. Wilson
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Pathology, Physiology, and Weed Science, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061-0331 and Painter, VA 23420
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: hatzios@vt.edu.

Abstract

Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of rimsulfuron were studied in three solanaceous weeds. Eastern black nightshade is sensitive (> 95% injury), hairy nightshade is moderately sensitive (50 to 99% injury), and black nightshade is tolerant to rimsulfuron postemergence (POST). Seedlings at the four- to six-leaf stage were treated with foliar-applied 14C-labeled rimsulfuron for 3, 6, 24, and 48 h after treatment. Absorption of rimsulfuron by all weeds increased with time. Black and eastern black nightshade absorbed comparable amounts of radioactivity at each exposure time. Hairy nightshade absorbed less radiolabeled herbicide than the other two nightshades at any treatment time. Hairy nightshade absorbed 54% of the applied radioactivity at 48 h, compared to 74% absorbed by the other weeds. Translocation of rimsulfuron out of the treated leaf was rapid in all species. Black and eastern black nightshade translocated 50 to 70% of the absorbed radioactivity out of the treated leaf with 40 to 50% moving to the upper foliage. In hairy nightshade, about 40% of the absorbed radioactivity translocated out of the treated leaf with equal amounts moving to the upper and lower foliage. Metabolism of 14C-rimsulfuron was rapid in the three nightshades with approximately 54% remaining as rimsulfuron at 3 h after treatment. The levels of the detected metabolites of rimsulfuron were similar in the three nightshade weeds. Differential early uptake and translocation may account for the differential sensitivity of these nightshade species to rimsulfuron.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Ackley, J. A., Wilson, H. P., and Hines, T. E. 1994. Weed management in tomatoes with rimsulfuron. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 34:64.Google Scholar
Ackley, J. A., Wilson, H. P., and Hines, T. E. 1996a. Weed management programs in potato (Solanum tuberosum) with rimsulfuron. Weed Technol. 10:354358.Google Scholar
Ackley, J. A., Wilson, H. P., and Hines, T. E. 1996b. Efficacy of rimsulfuron and metribuzin in potato (Solanum tuberosum). Weed Technol. 10:475480.Google Scholar
Ackley, J. A., Wilson, H. P., and Hines, T. E. 1998. Weed management in transplanted bell pepper (Capsicum frutescens) with clomazone and rimsulfuron. Weed Technol. 12:458462.Google Scholar
Bassett, I. J. and Munro, D. B. 1985. The Biology of Canadian Weeds. 67. Solanum ptycanthum Dun, S. nigrum L., and S. sarrachoides Sendtner. Can. J. Plant Sci. 65:401414.Google Scholar
Bewick, T. A., Smith, K. E., Stall, W. M., and Olsen, S. M. 1995. Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) cultivar and weed sensitivity to DPX-E9636. Weed Technol. 9:499503.Google Scholar
Blackshaw, R. E., Lynch, D. R., and Entz, T. 1995. Postemergence broadleaf weed control in potato (Solanum tuberosum) with rimsulfuron and HOE-075032. Weed Technol. 9:228235.Google Scholar
Brown, H. M. and Cotterman, J. C. 1994. Recent advances in sulfonylurea herbicides. In Ebing, W., ed. Chemistry of Plant Protection, Volume 10, Herbicides Inhibiting Branched-Chain Amino Acid Biosynthesis. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. pp. 4787.Google Scholar
Carey, J. B., Penner, D., and Kells, J. J. 1997. Physiological basis for nicosulfuron and primisulfuron selectivity in five plant species. Weed Sci. 45:2230.Google Scholar
Eberlein, C. V., Whitmore, J. C., Stanger, C. E., and Guttieri, M. J. 1994. Postemergence weed control in Potatoes (Solanum tuberosum) with rimsulfuron. Weed Technol. 8:428435.Google Scholar
Eberlein, C. V., Kral, W. C., and Guttieri, M. J. 1996. Using Matrix in Weed Management Systems for potatoes. Moscow, ID: Idaho Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 1037. 16 pp.Google Scholar
Green, J. M. and Green, J. H. 1993. Surfactant structure and concentration strongly affect rimsulfuron activity. Weed Technol. 7:633640.Google Scholar
Guttieri, M. J. and Eberlein, C. V. 1997. Preemergence weed control in potatoes (Solanum tuberosum) with rimsulfuron mixtures. Weed Technol. 11:755761.Google Scholar
Hawkes, T. R., Howard, J. L., and Pontin, S. E. 1989. Herbicides that inhibit the biosynthesis of branched chain amino acids. In Dodge, A. D., ed. Herbicides and Plant Metabolism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. pp. 113116.Google Scholar
Koeppe, M. K. and Brown, H. M. 1995. Sulfonylurea herbicide plant metabolism and crop selectivity. Agro-Food-Ind. Hi-Tech 6:914.Google Scholar
McGiffen, M. E., Matsiunas, J. B., and Hesketh, J. D. 1992. Competition for light between tomatoes and nightshades (Solanum nigrum or S. ptycanthum). Weed Sci. 40:220226.Google Scholar
Mekki, M. and Leroux, G. D. 1994. Activity of nicosulfuron, rimsulfuron, and their mixtures on field corn (Zea mays), soybean (Glycine max), and seven weed species. Weed Technol. 8:436440.Google Scholar
Ogg, A. Jr. 1986. Variation response of four nightshades (Solanum spp.) to herbicides. Weed Sci. 34:765772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogg, A. G. Jr., Rogers, B. S., and Schilling, E. E. 1981. Characterization of black nightshade (Solanum nigrum) and related species in the United States. Weed Sci. 29:2732.Google Scholar
Owen, W. J. 1989. Metabolism of herbicides—detoxification as a basis of selectivity. In Dodge, A. D., ed. Herbicides and Plant Metabolism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. pp. 171198.Google Scholar
Perez, F.G.M. and Matsiunas, J. B. 1990. Eastern black nightshade (Solanum ptycanthum) interference in processing tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum). Weed Sci. 38:385388.Google Scholar
Robinson, D. K., Monks, D. W., and Monaco, T. J. 1996. Potato (Solanum tuberosum) tolerance and susceptibility of eight weeds to rimsulfuron with and without metribuzin. Weed Technol. 10:2934.Google Scholar
Robinson, D. K., Monks, D. W., Burton, J. D., Maness, E. P., and Monaco, T. J. 1997. Tomato and eastern black nightshade (Solanum ptycanthum) differential resistance to rimsulfuron. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 37:123.Google Scholar
Schneiders, G. E., Koeppe, M. K., Naidu, M. V., Horne, P., Brown, A. M., and Mucha, C. F. 1993. Fate of rimsulfuron in the environment. J. Agric. Food Chem. 41:24042410.Google Scholar
Weaver, S. E., Smits, N., and Tan, C. S. 1987. Estimating yield losses of tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum) caused by nightshade (Solanum spp.) interference. Weed Sci. 35:163168.Google Scholar
Wilcut, J. W., Wehtje, G. R., Patterson, M. G., Cole, T. A., and Hicks, T. V. 1989. Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of foliar-applied chlorimuron in soybeans (Glycine max), peanuts (Arachis hypogaea), and selected weeds. Weed Sci. 37:175180.Google Scholar