Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:11:40.574Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Adjuvant Combinations with Quizalofop for Wild Oat (Avena fatua) Control in Peppermint (Mentha piperita)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Robert N. Stougaard
Robert N. Stougaard*
Affiliation:
Northwestern Agricultural Research Center, Kali-Veil, MT 59901
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted at Kalispell, MT, to determine the optimum adjuvant combination for wild oat control in peppermint with quizalofop. Quizalofop was applied to four- and eight-leaf wild oat plants at 20 and 50 g ai/ha with either a nonionic surfactant (NIS) or methylated seed oil (MSO) alone or in combination with 28% urea ammonium nitrate (UAN) liquid fertilizer. Differences among adjuvants were most apparent when quizalofop was applied at the lowest rate. MSO was more effective than NIS for enhancing quizalofop activity. Quizalofop efficacy with both adjuvants increased when applied with UAN. Greater than 90% wild oat control was obtained with the lowest rate when applied with MSO plus UAN to four-leaf wild oat plants. These results demonstrate the potential to improve the consistency of weed control as well as reduce postemergence herbicide rates when applied with the proper adjuvant combination.

Keywords

Quizalofop, (±)-2-[4-[(6-chloro-2-quinoxalinyl)oxy]phenoxy]propanoic acidwild oat, Avena fatua L. # AVEFApeppermint, Mentha piperita L.Additivesadjuvantsapplication timingaryloxyphenoxypropanoateAVEFAMSO, methylated seed oilNIS, nonionic surfactantUAN urea ammonium nitrogen
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , March 1997 , pp. 45 - 50
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Beckett, T. H., Stoller, E. W., and Bode, L. E. 1992. Quizalofop and sethoxydim activity as affected by adjuvants and ammonium fertilizers. Weed Sci. 40:12–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grafstrom, L. D., and Nalewaja, J. D. 1988. Uptake and translocation of fluazifop in green foxtail (Setaria viridis). Weed Sci. 36:153–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guenther, E., 1949. Oil of peppermint. In The Essential Oils. Volume 3. Malabar, FL: Robert E. Krieger. pp. 586–687.Google Scholar
Marker, N. K., 1992. Effects of various adjuvants on sethoxydim activity. Weed Technol. 6:865–870.Google Scholar
Marker, N. K., 1995. Ammonium sulfate effects on the activity of herbicides for selective grass control. Weed Technol. 9:260–266.Google Scholar
Kells, J. J., Meggitt, W. F., and Penner, D. 1984. Absorption, translocation, and activity of fluazifop-butyl as influenced by plant growth stage and environment. Weed Sci. 32:143–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kothari, S. K., Singh, D. V., and Singh, K. 1991. Critical periods of weed interference in Japanese mint (Mentha arvensis L.). Trop. Pest Manage. 37:85–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manthey, F. A., Szelezniak, E. F., Anyszka, Z. M., and Nalewaja, J. D. 1992. Foliar absorption and phytotoxicity of quizalofop with lipid compounds. Weed Sci. 40:558–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCall, P. J., 1988. Effect of chemical structure, temperature, crop oil concentrate, and bentazon on the behavior of haloxyfop in yellow foxtail (Setaria glauca)—a quantitative modeling approach. Weed Sci. 36:424–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMullan, P. M., 1994. Effect of sodium bicarbonate on clethodim or quizalofop efficacy and the role of ultraviolet light. Weed Technol. 8:572–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMullan, P. M., 1996. Grass herbicide efficacy as influenced by adjuvant, spray solution pH, and ultraviolet light. Weed Technol. 10:72–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nalewaja, J. D., Skrzypczak, G. A., and Gillespie, G. R. 1986. Absorption and translocation of herbicides with lipid compounds. Weed Sci. 34:564–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nandula, V. K., Curran, W. S., Roth, G. W., and Hartwig, N. L. 1995. Effectiveness of adjuvants with nicosulfuron and primisulfuron for wirestem muhly (Muhlenbergia frondosa) control in no-till corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 9:525–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogg, A. G., 1975. Evaluation of herbicides for weed control in mint. Wash. State Univ. Agric. Res. Cent. Bull. 810:1–10.Google Scholar
Welty, L. E., and Prestbye, L. S. 1995. Evaluation of mint cultivars in the presence and absence of V. dahliae . Mint Industry Research Council—1995 Research Report. Chapter 8.Google Scholar
Whitesides, R. E., and Appleby, A. P. 1979. Dowco 290 herbicide for selective control of Canada thistle in peppermint. Down Earth 35:14–18.Google Scholar