Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T12:07:22.345Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Adjuvants Enhance Weed Control Efficacy of Foliar-Applied Diuron

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Megh Singh ,
Siyun Tan  and
Shiv D. Sharma
Megh Singh*
Affiliation:
Citrus Research and Education Center, University of Florida, IFAS, 700 Experiment Station Road, Lake Alfred, FL 33850-2299
Siyun Tan
Affiliation:
Citrus Research and Education Center, University of Florida, IFAS, 700 Experiment Station Road, Lake Alfred, FL 33850-2299
Shiv D. Sharma
Affiliation:
Citrus Research and Education Center, University of Florida, IFAS, 700 Experiment Station Road, Lake Alfred, FL 33850-2299
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: mes@lal.ufl.edu.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The relationship between surface activity and weed control efficacy of diuron spray solution (0.075 kg ai/ha) with 12 adjuvants (0.1% v/v) was studied in the laboratory and the greenhouse. Organosilicone adjuvants reduced surface tension (ST) and contact angle (CA) of diuron spray solutions to a greater extent than did nonsilicone adjuvants. Three organosilicone adjuvants significantly increased the control and reduced the fresh weight of barnyardgrass. Contact angle was more closely correlated with diuron efficacy than ST, and the coefficient of determination between the CA and the fresh weight or control percent of barnyardgrass was 0.41. Kinetic® applied before or in combination with diuron significantly enhanced diuron efficacy. However, Kinetic sprayed after diuron did not affect the efficacy. Kinetic influenced the retention and absorption of diuron rather than its deposition and translocation.

Keywords

Diuronbarnyardgrass, Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) Beauv. #3 ECHCRAdjuvantAmaranthus retroflexusAMAREChenopodium albumCHEALcontact angleorganosiliconeSetria glaucaSETGLsurface tension, surfactantCA, contact angleST, surface tension; WAT, weeks after treatment
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 16 , Issue 1 , March 2002 , pp. 74 - 78
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Foy, C. L. 1989. Adjuvants: terminology, classification, and mode of action. In Chow, P.N.P., Grant, C. A., Hinshalwood, A. M., and Simundsson, E., eds. Adjuvants and Agrochemicals. Volume 1. Mode of Action and Physiological Activity. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. pp. 1–16.Google Scholar
Foy, C. L. and Smith, L. W. 1965. Surface tension lowering, wettability of paraffin and corn leaf surfaces, and herbicidal enhancement of dalapon by seven surfactants. Weeds 13: 15–19.Google Scholar
Frans, R., Talbert, R., and Marx, D. 1986. Experimental design and techniques for measuring and analyzing plant responses to weed control practices. In Camper, N. D., ed. Research Methods in Weed Science. Champaign, IL: Southern Weed Science Society. pp. 29–46.Google Scholar
Hill, G. D., Belasco, I. J., and Ploeg, H. L. 1965. Influence of surfactants on the activity of diuron, linuron, and bromacil as foliar sprays on weeds. Weeds 13: 103–106.Google Scholar
Kirkwood, R. C. 1991. Pathways and mechanisms of uptake of foliage applied herbicides with particular reference to the role of surfactant. In Kirkwood, R. C., ed. Target Sites for Herbicide Action. London: Plenum Press. pp. 219–243.Google Scholar
Kocher, H. and Kocur, J. 1993. Influence of wetting agents on the foliar uptake and herbicidal activity of glufosinate. Pestic. Sci. 37: 155–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Donovan, J. T., O'Sullivan, P. A., and Caldwell, C. D. 1985. Basis for changes in glyphosate phytotoxicity to barley by the non-ionic surfactants Tween 20 and Renex 36. Weed Res. 25: 81–86.Google Scholar
Percival, M. P., Blowers, M. H., Green, J. W., and Baker, N. R. 1992. Chlorophyll fluorescence—a noninvasive technique for rapid investigation of the effects of adjuvants on herbicide and plant growth regulator uptake by leaves. In Foy, C. L., ed. Adjuvants for Agrichemicals. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. pp. 187–193.Google Scholar
Roggenbuck, F. C., Penner, D., Burow, R. F., and Thomas, B. 1993. Study of the enhancement of herbicide activity and rainfastness by an organosilicone adjuvant utilizing radiolabeled herbicide and adjuvant. Pestic. Sci. 37: 121–125.Google Scholar
Schonherr, J. and Riederer, M. 1989. Foliar penetration and accumulation of organic chemicals in plant cuticles. Rev. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 108: 1–71.Google Scholar
Sharma, S. D., Kirkwood, R. C., and Wheteley, T. L. 1996. Effect of nonionic nonylphenol surfactants on surface physicochemical properties, uptake, and distribution of asulam and diflufenican. Weed Res. 36: 227–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silcox, D. and Holloway, P. J. 1989. Foliar absorption of some nonionic surfactants from aqueous solutions in the absence and presence of pesticidal active ingredients. In Chow, P.N.P., Grant, C. A., Hinshalwood, A. M., and Simundsson, E., eds. Adjuvants and Agrochemicals. Volume 1. Mode of Action and Physiological Activity. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. pp. 115–128.Google Scholar
Singh, M. and Mack, R. E. 1993. Effect of organosilicone-based adjuvants on herbicide efficacy. Pestic. Sci. 38: 219–225.Google Scholar
Singh, M., Orsenigo, J. R., and Shah, D. O. 1984. Surface tension and contact angle of herbicide solutions affected by surfactants. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 61: 596–599.Google Scholar
Stevens, P. J. G., Gaskin, R. E., Hong, S. O., and Zabkiewicz, J. A. 1991. Contribution of stomatal infiltration and cuticular penetration to enhancements of foliar uptake by surfactants. Pestic. Sci. 33: 371–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stock, D. and Holloway, P. J. 1993. Possible mechanisms for surfactant-induced foliar uptake of agrochemicals. Pestic. Sci. 38: 165–177.Google Scholar
Van Valkenburg, J. W. 1982. Terminology, classification, and chemistry. In Hodgson, R. H., ed. Adjuvants for Herbicides. Champaign, IL: Weed Sci. Soc. Am. pp. 1–9.Google Scholar
Wyrill, J. B. and Burnside, O. C. 1977. Glyphosate toxicity to common milkweed and hemp dogbane as influenced by surfactants. Weed Sci. 25: 275–281.Google Scholar
Zabkiewicz, J., Forster, W. A., Steele, K. D., and Liu, Z. Q. 1995. Comparison of uptake into field bean (Vicia faba) and wheat (Triticum aestivum) of organosilicone and non-silicone surfactants. In Gaskin, R. E., ed. Adjuvants for Agrochemicals. Rotorua, New Zealand: New Zealand Forest Research Institute. pp. 219–224.Google Scholar