Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T14:48:01.098Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Annual Grass Control by Glyphosate plus Bentazon, Chlorimuron, Fomesafen, or Imazethapyr Mixtures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Agustin E. Gimenez ,
Alan C. York ,
John W. Wilcut  and
Roger B. Batts
Agustin E. Gimenez
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
Alan C. York
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
John W. Wilcut
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
Roger B. Batts
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The isopropylamine salt of glyphosate at 420, 560, and 840 g ae/ha applied alone or mixed with the sodium salt of bentazon at 840 g ai/ha, chlorimuron at 9 g ai/ha, the sodium salt of fomesafen at 350 g ai/ha, or the ammonium salt of imazethapyr at 70 g ae/ha was evaluated for control of large crabgrass and broadleaf signalgrass. Neither grass was controlled by bentazon, fomesafen, or chlorimuron. Imazethapyr controlled large crabgrass and broadleaf signalgrass 30 and 72%, respectively, 3 weeks after treatment (WAT). Glyphosate at all rates controlled both grasses 100%. Control 3 WAT was unaffected by mixing bentazon, chlorimuron, fomesafen, or imazethapyr with glyphosate. Broadleaf signalgrass control 1 WAT was reduced 4 to 15% by mixing bentazon with glyphosate.

Keywords

Bentazon, 3-(1-methylethyl)-(lH)-2,1,3-benzothiadiazin-4(3H)-one 2,2-dioxidechlorimuron, 2-[[[[(4-chloro-6-methoxy-2-pyrimidinyl)amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]benzoic acidfomesafen, 5-[2-chloro-4-(trifluoromethyl)phenoxy]-N-(methylsulfonyl)-2-nitrobenzamideglyphosate, N-(phosphonomethyl)glycineimazethapyr, 2-[4,5-dihydro-4-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-5-oxo-1H-imidazol-2-yl]-5-ethyl-3-pyridinecarboxylic acidbroadleaf signalgrass, Brachiaria platyphylla (Griseb.) Nash # BRAPPlarge crabgrass, Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop. # DIGSAHerbicide mixturespostemergence weed controlBrachiaria platyphyllaDigitaria sanguinalisBRAPPDIGSAPOST, postemergenceWAT, weeks after treatment
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , March 1998 , pp. 134 - 136
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Baldwin, F. L., 1995. Weed control in Roundup tolerant soybeans. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 48:46.Google Scholar
Campbell, D. C., and Murray, D. S. 1991. Use of imazethapyr in peanuts. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 44:119.Google Scholar
Gimenez, A. E., 1997. Weed management in glyphosate-tolerant soybean (<i>Glycine max</i>). . North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC. 112 p.Google Scholar
Hatzios, K. K., and Penner, D. 1985. Interactions of herbicides with other agrochemicals in higher plants. Rev. Weed Sci. 1:1–63.Google Scholar
Jordan, D. L., York, A. C., Griffin, J. L., Clay, P. A., Vidrine, P. R., and Reynolds, D. B. 1997. Influence of application variables on efficacy of glyphosate. Weed Technol. 11:354–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krausz, R., Kapusta, G., and Matthews, J. L. 1996. Control of annual weeds with glyphosate. Weed Technol. 10:957–962.Google Scholar
Lich, J. M., Renner, K. A., and Penner, D. 1997. Interaction of glyphosate with postemergence soybean (<i>Glycine max</i>) herbicides. Weed Sci. 45:12–21.Google Scholar
Meyer, P. F., 1991. The interaction of imazethapyr with selected grass herbicides. . North Carolina State University. Raleigh, NC. 57 p.Google Scholar
Murdock, E. C., Wilson, H. P., and York, A. C. 1997. Growers' results with Roundup Ready soybean. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 50:2.Google Scholar
Ohmes, G. A., Kendig, J. A., Barham, R. L., Swims, P. A., and Turman, P. C. 1996. Glyphosate/Roundup-Ready soybean performance. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 49:18.Google Scholar
Starke, R. J., and Oliver, L. R. 1996. Postemergence weed control with glyphosate in combination with chlorimuron, fomesafen, and sulfentrazone. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 49:55.Google Scholar
H, Tingle. C., Shaw, D. R., and Hall, J. 1996. Timing and rate of Roundup in Roundup-Ready soybean. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 49:55.Google Scholar
Vidrine, P. R., Griffin, J. L., Jordan, D. L., and Miller, D. K. 1997. Postemergence weed control in soybeans utilizing glyphosate and chlorimuron. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 50:175.Google Scholar
Walker, R. H., and Spratlin, C. E. 1995. Weed management in glyphosate-tolerant soybean. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 48:39–40.Google Scholar
T, Wesley. M. and Shaw, D. R. 1992. Interactions of diphenylether herbicides with chlorimuron and imazaquin. Weed Technol. 6:345–351.Google Scholar
Wilcut, J. W., Coble, H. D., York, A. C., and Monks, D. W. 1996. The potential niche for herbicide-resistant crops in U.S. agriculture. <i>In</i> Duke, S. O., ed. Herbicide-Resistant Crops: Agricultural, Environmental, Economic. Regulatory, and Technical Aspects. New York: CRC Press and Lewis Publishers. pp. 213–230.Google Scholar
York, A. C., 1995. Weed management in Roundup-Ready soybeans. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 48:34–35.Google Scholar