Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:02:09.377Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Application Timing of Herbicides for the Control of Redvine (Brunnichia ovata)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

David R. Shaw
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Pathol. Weed Sci., Miss. State Univ., Mississippi State, MS 39762
Robert E. Mack
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Pathol. Weed Sci., Miss. State Univ., Mississippi State, MS 39762

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted in 1986 and 1987 to determine the efficacy of various herbicides applied in the spring or fall for redvine population reductions. Spring applications of dicamba and picloram reduced redvine populations 4 mo after application. These treatments also reduced soybean density. A sequential spring followed by fall application of dicamba reduced redvine stem counts 32 to 45% the following year. Spring or spring followed by fall applications of clopyralid and hexazinone were not effective in reducing redvine populations. A fall application of clopyralid, dicamba, Dowco 433, glyphosate, or imazapyr reduced redvine regrowth 78 to 97% the following year. Dicamba at 2.2 kg ae ha-1, 3.4 kg ae ha-1 glyphosate, and 0.28 kg ai ha-1 imazapyr increased soybean yield the following year because of reduced redvine competition and lack of herbicide injury. Redvine populations were unaffected by fall applications of fosamine, hexazinone, and picloram, or clomazone applied in the spring or in the fall followed by a sequential spring application. A sequential spring followed by fall treatment of 1.1 + 1.1 kg ha-1 dicamba or 0.14 + 0.14 kg ae ha-1 clopyralid reduced trumpetcreeper population 49 to 58% the following year.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Ashley, D. A., and Ethridge, W. J. 1978. Irrigation effects on vegetative and reproductive development of three soybean cultivars. Agron. J. 70:467471.Google Scholar
2. Baker, R. S. 1979. Redvine growth and control. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 32:367370.Google Scholar
3. Defelice, M. S. 1980. Redvine (Brunnichia cirrhosa) and trumpetcreeper (Campsis radicans) control for soybeans and grain sorghum in Arkansas. M. S. Thesis, Univ. of Arkansas. 82 p.Google Scholar
4. Doss, B. D., Pearson, R. W., and Rodgers, J. T. 1974. Effect of soil water stress at various growth stages on soybean yield. Agron. J. 66: 297299.Google Scholar
5. Elmore, C. D. 1984. Perennial vines in the Delta of Mississippi. Miss. Agric. For. Exp. Stn. Info. Bull. 927. 9 p.Google Scholar
6. Jackson, L. A., Kapusta, G., and Shutte-Mason, D. J. 1985. Effect of duration and type of natural weed infestations on soybean yield. Agron. J. 77:725729.Google Scholar
7. Lauridson, T. C., Wilson, R. G., and Haderlie, L. C. 1983. Effect of moisture stress on Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) control. Weed Sci. 31:674680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Moore, R. J. 1975. The biology of Canadian weeds. 13. [Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop.]. Can. J. Plant Sci. 55:10331048.Google Scholar
9. Radford, A. E., Ahles, H. E., and Bell, C. R. 1983. Brunnichia cirrhosa . p. 417 in Manual of the Vascular Flora of the Carolinas. Univ. of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
10. Wiese, A. F., and Rea, H. E. 1959. Field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis) control and seedling emergence as affected by tillage, 2,4-D and competitive crops. Agron. J. 51:672675.Google Scholar
11. Wiese, A. F., and Lavake, D. E. 1985. Control of field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis) with postemergence herbicides. Weed Sci. 34: 7780.Google Scholar