Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T10:20:41.992Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bermudagrass tolerance of indaziflam PRE applications in forage production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 September 2019

Nicholas L. Hurdle Open the ORCID record for Nicholas L. Hurdle [Opens in a new window] ,
Timothy L. Grey ,
Patrick E. McCullough ,
Donn Shilling  and
Jason Belcher
Nicholas L. Hurdle*
Affiliation:
Graduate Research Assistant, Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, University of Georgia, Tifton, GA, USA
Timothy L. Grey
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, University of Georgia, Tifton, GA, USA
Patrick E. McCullough
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, University of Georgia, Griffin, GA, USA
Donn Shilling
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA
Jason Belcher
Affiliation:
Eastern Regional Stewardship and Development Manager, Vegetation Management, Bayer United States, Auburn, AL, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Nicholas L. Hurdle, 2360 Rainwater Road, Tifton, GA 31793. Email: Nicholas.Hurdle@uga.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Bermudagrass is a major forage species throughout Georgia and the Southeast. An essential part of achieving high-yielding, top-quality forages is proper weed control. Indaziflam is a residual herbicide that controls many broadleaf and grass species by inhibiting cellulose biosynthesis. Research conducted in Tift and Colquitt counties in Georgia determined optimal PRE rates for indaziflam for bermudagrass forage production. Treatments applied at spring greenup of established ‘Alicia’ bermudagrass included indaziflam at 47, 77, 155, or 234 g ai ha−1 PRE, pendimethalin at 4,480 g ha−1 PRE, a split application of indaziflam at 47 g ha−1 PRE followed by the same rate applied POST after the first cutting, and a nontreated control (seven treatments in all). Forages were machine harvested three times each year for each location beginning at least 47 d after treatment (DAT), with final cuttings up to 168 DAT. For all treatments, fresh- and dry-weight yields at each harvest and totals for the season did not differ from the nontreated control. Indaziflam at 155 and 234 g ha−1 did cause minor stunting at 44 DAT, but this was transient and not observed at the second harvest. Indaziflam applied PRE has the potential to provide residual control of troublesome weeds in bermudagrass forage and hay production, with ephemeral stunting at the recommended application rates.

Keywords

Scott McElroy, Auburn UniversityIndaziflampendimethalinbermudagrassCynodon dactylon (L.) Pers.Hay productionresidual
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 34 , Issue 1 , February 2020 , pp. 125 - 128
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anonymous (2017). Registration of Specticle FLO. https://www3.epa.gov/pesticides/chem_search/ppls/000432-01518-20110907.pdf Google Scholar
Bhowmik, PC, Bingham, SW (1990) Preemergence activity of dinitroaniline herbicides used for weed control in cool-season turfgrasses. Weed Technol 4:387–393 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brabham, C, Lei, L, Gu, Y, Stork, J, Barrett, M, DeBolt, S (2014) Indaziflam herbicidal action: a potent cellulose biosynthesis inhibitor. Plant Physiol. 166:1177–1185 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brosnan, JT, Breeden, GK (2012). Application placement affects postemergence smooth crabgrass (Digitaria ischaemum) and annual bluegrass (Poa annua) control with indaziflam. Weed Technol 26:661–665 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brosnan, JT, Breeden, GK, McCullough, PE, Henry, GM (2012) PRE and POST control of annual bluegrass with indaziflam. Weed Technol 26:48–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, TJ, Muir, JP (2006) Coastal bermudagrass yield response to various herbicides. Weed Technol 20:95–100 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grey, TL, Luo, X, Rucker, K, Webster, TM (2016) High-density plantings of olive trees are tolerant to repeated applications of indaziflam. Weed Sci 64:766–771 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grey, TL, Rucker, K, Wells, ML, Luo, X (2018) Response of young pecan trees to repeated applications of indaziflam and halosulfuron. HortSci 53:313–317 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hancock, DW, Harris, G, McCullough (2017) Bermudagrasses in Georgia. University of Georgia Cooperative Extension. Bulletin 911. https://secure.caes.uga.edu/extension/publications/files/pdf/B%20911_4.PDF. Accessed: March 8, 2018Google Scholar
Jhala, AJ, Singh, M (2012) Leaching of indaziflam compared with residual herbicides commonly used in Florida citrus. Weed Technol 26:602–607 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marble, SC, Chandler, A, Archer, M (2016) Impact of application rate, timing, and indaziflam formulation on early POST control of Oxalis stricta . Weed Technol 30:701–707 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masters, RA, Nissen, SJ, Gaussoin, RE, Beran, DD, Stougaard, RN (1996) Imidazolinone herbicides improve restoration of Great Plains grasslands. Weed Technol 2:392–403 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matocha, MA, Grichar, WJ, Grymes, C (2010) Field sandbur control and bermudagrass response to nicosulfuron tank mix combinations. Weed Technol 24:510–514 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCullough, PE (2018) Weed control in grass pastures and hayfields. Pages 466–498 in Georgia Pest Management Handbook, 2018 Commercial Edition. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Cooperative Extension Service Google Scholar
McCullough, PE, Yu, J, Gómez de Barreda, D (2013) Efficacy of preemergence herbicides for controlling a dinitroaniline-resistant goosegrass (Eleusine indica) in Georgia. Weed Technol 27:639–644 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Agricultural Statistics Service [NASS] (2018) United States Department of Agriculture =http://www.bho.usda.gov/Statistics_by_Subject/index.php?sector%3dCrops Accessed: March 8, 2015Google Scholar
Shaner, DL, ed. (2014) Herbicide Handbook. 10th edn. Lawrence, KS: Weed Science Society of America. Pp 266–267 Google Scholar
Simmons, D (2017) Evaluating commercial cultivars and farm-collected biotypes of Italian ryegrass [Lolium perenne L. subsp. multiflorum (Lam.) Husnot] for potential herbicide resistance in Georgia. University of Georgia Theses and Dissertations. https://athenaeum.libs.uga.edu/handle/10724/38241. Accessed: March 18, 2019Google Scholar
Walker, RH, Wehtje, G, Richburg, III JS (1998) Interference and control of large crabgrass and southern sandbur in forage bermudagrass. Weed Technol 12:707–711 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, TM (2012). Weed Survey–Southern States Grass Crops Subsection. Pages 267–288 in Proceedings of the 65th Southern Weed Science Society Meeting. Charleston, SC: Southern Weed Science Society Google Scholar