Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T07:28:57.455Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Biologically effective dose of pyraflufen-ethyl/2,4-D, applied preplant alone or mixed with metribuzin on glyphosate-resistant horseweed in soybean

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2021

David B. Westerveld ,
Nader Soltani Open the ORCID record for Nader Soltani [Opens in a new window] ,
David C. Hooker ,
Darren E. Robinson  and
Peter H. Sikkema
David B. Westerveld
Affiliation:
Graduate Student, Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph, Ridgetown, ON, Canada
Nader Soltani*
Affiliation:
Adjunct Professor, Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph, Ridgetown, ON, Canada
David C. Hooker
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph, Ridgetown, ON, Canada
Darren E. Robinson
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph, Ridgetown, ON, Canada
Peter H. Sikkema
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph, Ridgetown, ON, Canada
*
Author for correspondence: Nader Soltani, Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph Ridgetown Campus, 120 Main St. East, Ridgetown, ON, CanadaN0P 2C0 Email: soltanin@uoguelph.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Glyphosate resistance in weed species has presented immense challenges for farmers in Ontario. The co-application of burndown plus residual herbicides provides control of glyphosate-resistant (GR) horseweed in soybean. Pyraflufen-ethyl/2,4-D is a premixed herbicide formulation sold under the tradename Blackhawk®. Five field experiments were conducted over a 2-yr period (2019, 2020) in fields in southwestern Ontario to ascertain the biologically effective dose of pyraflufen-ethyl/2,4-D, applied alone, or mixed with metribuzin, for GR horseweed control when applied preplant to soybean. Soybean visible injury for all treatments was <15%. At 8 wk after application (WAA), the calculated doses of pyraflufen-ethyl/2,4-D for 50%, 80%, and 95% control of GR horseweed were 390, 1,148, and >2,108 g ha−1, respectively. The addition of metribuzin to pyraflufen-ethyl/2,4-D reduced the doses of pyraflufen-ethyl/2,4-D for 50%, 80%, and 95% control of GR horseweed to 19, 46, and 201 g ha−1, respectively. Pyraflufen-ethyl/2,4-D + metribuzin controlled GR horseweed by 97%, which is comparable to the current industry standards. Based on these results, pyraflufen-ethyl/2,4-D + metribuzin (527 + 400 g ha−1) applied preplant can be used for GR horseweed control in soybean.

Keywords

2,4-Dmetribuzinpyraflufen-ethylhorseweedConyza canadensis (L.) Cronq.soybeanGlycine max (L.) MerrCanada fleabaneglyphosate resistancedistributionmultiple-resistantpreplant applicationvisible control
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 35 , Issue 5 , October 2021 , pp. 824 - 829
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Weed Science Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Associate Editor: Kevin Bradley, University of Missouri

References

Anonymous (2019) Blackhawk® Herbicide. Calgary, AB: Nufarm Agriculture Inc. 10 p Google Scholar
Bruce, JA, Kells, JJ (1990) Horseweed (Conyza canadensis) control in no-tillage soyabeans (Glycine max) with preplant and preemergence herbicides. Weed Technol 4:642–647 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Budd, CM, Soltani, N, Robinson, DE, Hooker, DC, Miller, RT, Sikkema, PH (2016) Control of glyphosate resistant Canada fleabane with saflufenacil plus tankmix partners in soybean. Can J Plant Sci 96:989–994 Google Scholar
Budd, CM, Soltani, N, Robinson, DE, Hooker, DC, Miller, RT, Sikkema, PH (2017) Distribution of glyphosate and cloransulam-methyl resistant Canada fleabane (Conyza canadensis (L.) Cronq.) in Ontario. Can J Plant Sci 98:492–497 Google Scholar
Buhler, DD and Owen, MD (1997) Emergence and survival of horseweed (Conyza canadensis). Weed Sci 45:98–101 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byker, HP, Soltani, N, Robinson, DE, Tardif, FJ, Lawton, MB, Sikkema, PH (2013a) Occurrence of glyphosate and cloransulam resistant Canada fleabane (Conyza canadensis (L.). Cronq.) in Ontario. Can J Plant Sci 93:851–855 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byker, HP, Soltani, N, Robinson, DE, Tardif, FJ, Lawton, MB, Sikkema, PH (2013b) Control of glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Conyza canadensis) with dicamba applied preplant and postemergence in dicamba-resistant soybean. Weed Technol 27:492–496 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byker, HP, Soltani, N, Robinson, DE, Tardif, FJ, Lawton, MB, Sikkema, PH (2013c) Control of glyphosate-resistant Canada fleabane (Conyza canadensis (L.) Cronq.) with preplant herbicide tankmixes in soybean (Glycine max.(L). Merr.). Can J Plant Sci 93:659–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byker, HP, Soltani, N, Robinson, DE, Tardif, FJ, Lawton, MB, Sikkema, PH (2013d) Glyphosate-resistant Canada fleabane (Conyza canadensis (L). Cronq.): Dose response to glyphosate and control with postemergence herbicides in soybean in Ontario. Can J Plant Sci 93:1187–1193 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colby, SR (1967) Calculating synergistic and antagonistic responses of herbicide combinations. Weeds 15:20–22 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dauer, JT, Mortensen, DA, VanGessel, MJ (2007) Temporal and spatial dynamics of long-distance Conyza canadensis seed dispersal. J Appl Ecol 44:105–114 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, VM, Johnson, WG (2008) Glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Conyza canadensis) emergence, survival, and fecundity in no-till soybean. Weed Sci 56:231–236 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eubank, TW, Poston, DH, Nandula, VK, Koger, CH, Shaw, DR, Reynolds, DB (2008) Glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Conyza canadensis) control using glyphosate-, paraquat-, and glufosinate-based herbicide programs. Weed Technol 22:16–21 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, L, Soltani, N, McFadden, A, Nurse, RE, Robinson, DE, Sikkema, PH (2014) Control of Canada fleabane (Conyza canadensis) with glyphosate DMA/2, 4-D choline applications in corn (Zea mays). Agric Sci 5:77–83 Google Scholar
Han, H, Picoli, Jr GJ, Guo, H, Yu, Q, Powles, SB (2020) Mechanistic basis for synergism of 2,4-D amine and metribuzin in Avena sterilis . J Pestic Sci 45:216–222 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hedges, BK, Soltani, N, Robinson, DE, Hooker, DC, Sikkema, PH (2018) Control of glyphosate-resistant Canada fleabane in Ontario with multiple effective modes-of-action in glyphosate/dicamba-resistant soybean. Can J Plant Sci 99:78–83 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruger, GR, Davis, VM, Weller, SC, Johnson, WG (2010a) Control of horseweed (Conyza canadensis) with growth regulator herbicides. Weed Technol 24:425–429 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruger, GR, Davis, VM, Weller, SC, Johnson, WG (2010b) Growth and seed production of horseweed (Conyza canadensis) populations after exposure to postemergence 2,4-D. Weed Sci 58:413–419 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ludwig, JW (1973) The use of a low dose of atrazine alone and in mixtures with other herbicides in the maize crop. Weed Res 13:12–18 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mabuchi, T, Miura, Y, Ohtsuka, T (2002) Herbicidal activity and characteristics of pyraflufen-ethyl for controlling broad-leaved weeds in cereals. J Pest Sci 27:39–46 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nandula, VK, Eubank, TW, Poston, DH, Koger, CH, Reddy, KN (2006) Factors affecting germination of horseweed (Conyza canadensis). Weed Sci 54:898–902 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarangi, D, Irmak, S, Lindquist, JL, Knezevic, SZ, Jhala, AJ (2016). Effect of water stress on the growth and fecundity of common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis). Weed Sci 64:42–52 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soltani, N, Jhala, AJ, Shropshire, C, Sikkema, PH (2016) Control of glyphosate-resistant Canada fleabane in soybean with preplant herbicides. Can J Plant Sci 97:408–410 Google Scholar
Soltani, N, Shropshire, C, Sikkema, PH (2020a) Control of glyphosate-resistant marestail in identity-preserved or glyphosate-resistant and glyphosate/dicamba-resistant soybean with preplant herbicides. Am J Plant Sci 11:851–860 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soltani, N, Shropshire, C, Sikkema, PH (2020b) Glyphosate-resistant Canada fleabane control with three-way herbicide tankmixes in soybean. Am J Plant Sci 11:1478–1486 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tahmasebi, BK, Alebrahim, MT, Roldán-Gómez, RA, da Silveira, HM, de Carvalho, LB, Alcántara-de la Cruz, R, De Prado, R (2018) Effectiveness of alternative herbicides on three Conyza species from Europe with and without glyphosate resistance. Crop Prot 112:350–355 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VanGessel, MJ (2001) Glyphosate-resistant horseweed from Delaware. Weed Sci 49:703–705 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, SE (2001) The biology of Canadian weeds. 115. Conyza canadensis . Can J Plant Sci 81:867–875 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmer, M, Young, BG, Johnson, WG (2018) Weed control with halauxifen-methyl applied alone and in mixtures with 2,4-D, dicamba, and glyphosate. Weed Technol 32:597–602 CrossRefGoogle Scholar