Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:29:56.409Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Broccoli, cabbage, squash and watermelon response to halosulfuron preplant over plastic mulch

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 October 2019

Taylor M. Randell Open the ORCID record for Taylor M. Randell [Opens in a new window] ,
Jenna C. Vance  and
A. Stanley Culpepper
Taylor M. Randell*
Affiliation:
Graduate Research Assistant, Department of Crop and Soil Science, University of Georgia, Tifton, GA, USA
Jenna C. Vance
Affiliation:
Research Professional, Department of Crop and Soil Science, University of Georgia, Tifton, GA, USA
A. Stanley Culpepper
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Crop and Soil Science, University of Georgia, Tifton, GA, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Taylor M. Randell, Department of Crop and Soil Science, University of Georgia, 2356 Rainwater Road, Tifton, GA 31794. Email: trandell@uga.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Nutsedge species are problematic in plastic-mulched vegetable production because of the weed’s rapid reproduction and ability to penetrate the mulch. Vegetable growers rely heavily on halosulfuron to manage nutsedge species; however, the herbicide cannot be applied over mulch before vegetable transplanting due to potential crop injury. This can be problematic when multiple crops are produced on a single mulch installation. Field experiments were conducted to determine the response of broccoli, cabbage, squash, and watermelon to halosulfuron applied on top of mulch prior to transplanting. Halosulfuron at 80 g ai ha−1 was applied 21, 14, 7, and 1 d before planting (DBP), and 160 g ai ha−1 was applied 21 DBP. In all experiments, extending the interval between halosulfuron application and planting reduced crop injury. For squash and watermelon, visual injury, plant diameters/vine runner lengths, marketable fruit weights, and postharvest plant biomass resulted in similar values when applying 80 g ha−1 21 DBP and with the nontreated weed-free control. Reducing this interval increased injury for both crops. Visual crop injury and yield reductions up to 40% occurred, with halosulfuron applied 14, 7, or 1 DBP in squash and 1 DBP in watermelon. Broccoli and cabbage showed greater sensitivity, with injury and plant diameter reductions greater than 15%, even with halosulfuron applied at 80 g ha−1 21 DBP. Experimental results confirm that halosulfuron binds to plastic mulch, remains active, and is slowly released from the mulch over a substantial period, during rainfall or overhead irrigation events. Extending the plant-back interval to at least 21 d before transplanting did overcome squash and watermelon injury concerns with halosulfuron at 80 g ha−1, but not broccoli and cabbage. Applying halosulfuron over mulch to control emerged nutsedge before planting squash and watermelon would be beneficial if adequate rainfall or irrigation and appropriate intervals between application and planting are implemented.

Keywords

Steve Fennimore, University of California, DavisHalosulfuronpurple nutsedge, Cyperus rotundus L.yellow nutsedge, Cyperus esculentus L.broccoli, Brassica oleracea var. botrytis L. ‘Emerald crown’cabbage, Brassica oleracea var. capitata L. ‘Cheers’squash, Cucurbita pepo L. ‘Enterprise’watermelon, Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum. & Nakai ‘Sangria’Herbicide application over plastic mulchherbicide retention on plastic mulch
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 34 , Issue 2 , April 2020 , pp. 202 - 207
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anonymous (2017) Sandea ® herbicide product label. Yuma, AZ: Gowan Company. 23 pGoogle Scholar
Boyhan, GE, Granberry, DM, Kelley, WT (2014) Squash Commercial Vegetable Production. Circular 527. Athens, GA: The University of Georgia. 4 pGoogle Scholar
Boyhan, GE, Granberry, DM, Kelley, WT (2017) Soils and Fertilizer Management in Commercial Watermelon Production. Bulletin 996. Athens, GA: The University of Georgia. 40 pGoogle Scholar
Buker, RS III, Stall, WM, Olson, SM, Shilling, DG (2003) Season-long interference of yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) with direct-seeded and transplanted watermelon (Citrullus lanatus). Weed Technol 17:751–754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coolong, T, Sparks, A, Dutta, B (2016) Fresh Market Broccoli Production for Georgia. Bulletin 1460. Athens, GA: The University of Georgia. 15 pGoogle Scholar
Corbett, JL, Askew, SD, Thomas, WE, Wilcut, JW (2004) Weed efficacy evaluations for bromoxynil, glufosinate, glyphosate, pyrithiobac, and sulfosate. Weed Technol 18:443–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culpepper, AS, Grey, TL, Webster, TM (2006) Purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus) response to methyl bromide alternatives applied under four types of mulch. Page 148in Proceedings of the Southern Weed Science Society. San Antonio, TX: Southern Weed Science SocietyGoogle Scholar
Dittmar, PJ, Monks, DW, Schultheis, JR, Jennings, KM (2008) Effects of postemergence and postemergence-directed halosulfuron on triploid watermelon (Citrullus lanatus). Weed Technol 22:467–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granberry, DM, Kelley, WT, Boyhan, GE (2017) Soil and Fertilizer Management in Commercial Production and Management of Cabbage and Leafy Greens. Bulletin 1181. Athens, GA: The University of Georgia. 48 pGoogle Scholar
Grey, TL, Vencill, WK, Webster, TM, Culpepper, AS (2009) Herbicide dissipation from low density polyethylene mulch. Weed Sci 57:351–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haar, MJ, Fennimore, SA, McGiffen, ME, Lanini, WT, Bell, CE (2002) Evaluation of preemergence herbicides in vegetable crops. HortTech 12:95–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, WC, Mullinix, BG (2002) Weed management in watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) and cantaloupe (Cucumis melo) transplanted on polyethylene-covered seedbeds. Weed Technol 16:860–866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keeley, PE (1987) Interference and interactions of purple and yellow nutsedges (Cyperus rotundus and C. esculentus) with crops. Weed Technol 1:74–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knox, P (2018) Georgia Automated Environmental Monitoring Network. Griffin, GA: The University of Georgia. http://www.georgiaweather.net. Accessed: October 1, 2018Google Scholar
Locascio, SJ, Gilreath, JP, Dickson, DW, Kucharek, TA, Jones, JP, Noling, JW (1997) Fumigant alternatives to methyl bromide for polyethylene-mulched tomato. HortScience 32:1208–1211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacRae, AW, Culpepper, AS (2006) Bell pepper and nutsedge response to DMDS alone and in combination with other fumigants. Page 145in Proceedings of the Southern Weed Science Society. San Antonio, TX: Southern Weed Science SocietyGoogle Scholar
MacRae, AW, Culpepper, AS, Batts, RB, Lewis, KL (2008) Seeded watermelon and weed response to halosulfuron applied preemergence and postemergence. Weed Technol 22:86–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Majek, BA (1988) Imazethapyr residue effects on several vegetable crops. Page 227in Proceedings of the Northeastern Weed Science Society. Hartford, CT: Northeastern Weed Science SocietyGoogle Scholar
Morales-Payan, JP, Santos, BM, Stall, WM, Bewick, TA (1997) Effects of purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus) on tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) and bell pepper (Capsicum annum) vegetative growth and fruit yield. Weed Technol 11:672–676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Motis, TN, Locascio, SJ, Gilreath, JP, Stall, WM (2003) Season-long interference of yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) with polyethylene-mulched bell pepper. Weed Technol 17:543–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pereira, W, Crabtree, G, William, RD (1987) Herbicide action on purple and yellow nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus and C. esculentus). Weed Technol 1:92–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richburg, JS III, Wilcut, JW, Wehtje, GR (1994) Toxicity of AC 263,222 to purple (Cyperus rotundus) and yellow nutsedge (C. esculentus). Weed Sci 42:398–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santos, BM, Bewick, TA, Stall, WM, Shilling, DG (1997) Competitive interactions of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) and nutsedges (Cyperus spp.). Weed Sci 45:229–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starke, KD, Monks, DW, Mitchem, WE, MacRae, AW (2006) Response of five summer-squash (Cucurbita pepo) cultivars to halosulfuron. Weed Technol 20:617–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stilwell, EK, Sweet, RD (1974) Competition of squash cultivars with weeds. Pages 229–233in Proceedings of the Northeastern Weed Science Society. Salisbury, MD: Northeast Weed Science SocietyGoogle Scholar
Tickes, BR, Umedak, K (1991) The effect of imazethapyr upon crops grown in rotation with alfalfa. Page 97in Proceedings of the Western Society of Weed Science. Seattle, WA: Western Society of Weed ScienceGoogle Scholar
Tyson, AW, Harrison, K (2017) Irrigation in Commercial Watermelon Production. Publication 996. Athens, GA: The University of Georgia. p 20Google Scholar
Van Wychen, L (2016) 2016 Survey of the Most Common and Troublesome Weeds in Broadleaf Crops, Fruits & Vegetables in the United States and Canada. Weed Science Society of America National Weed Survey Dataset. http://wssa.net/wp-content/uploads/2016-Weed-Survey_Broadleaf-crops.xlsx. Accessed: October 2, 2018Google Scholar
Vencill, WK, Richburg, JS, Wilcut, JW, Hawf, LR (1995) Effect of MON-12037 on purple (Cyperus rotundus) and yellow (Cyperus esculentus) nutsedge. Weed Technol 9:148–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, TM (2002) Nutsedge (Cyperus spp.) eradication: the impossible dream. Pages 21–25in National Proceedings: Forest Conservation Nursery Association. Ogden, UT: USDA Forest ServiceGoogle Scholar
Webster, TM (2005) Mulch type affects growth and tuber production of yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) and purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus). Weed Sci 53:834–838CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, TM (2010) Weed survey––southern states: vegetable, fruit and nut crops subsection. Pages 246–257 in Proceedings of the Southern Weed Science Society. Little Rock, AR: Southern Weed Science SocietyGoogle Scholar
Webster, TM (2014) Weed survey––southern states: vegetable, fruit and nut crops subsection. Pages 282–293in Proceedings of the Southern Weed Science Society. Birmingham, AL: Southern Weed Science SocietyGoogle Scholar
Webster, TM, Csinos, AS, Johnson, AW, Dowler, CC, Sumner, DR, Fery, RL (2001) Methyl bromide alternatives in a bell pepper-squash rotation. Crop Prot 20:605–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, TM, Culpepper, AS, Johnson, WC III (2003) Response of squash and cucumber cultivars to halosulfuron. Weed Technol 17:173–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, TM, Grey, TL, Davis, JW, Culpepper, AS (2008) Glyphosate hinders purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus) and yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) tuber production. Weed Sci 56:735–742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
William, RD, Warren, GF (1975) Competition between purple nutsedge and vegetables. Weed Sci 23:317–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfe, K, Stubbs, K (2017) 2016 Georgia Farm Gate Value Report. The Center for Agribusiness and Economic Development. AR-17-01. Athens, GA: The University of Georgia. 180 pGoogle Scholar