Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:22:58.233Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Carryover Injury of Clomazone Applied in Soybeans (Glycine max) and Fallow

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

William H. Ahrens  and
E. Patrick Fuerst
William H. Ahrens
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Washington State Univ., Pullman, WA 99164
E. Patrick Fuerst
Affiliation:
Dep. Crop Weed Sci., N. D. State Univ., Fargo 58105
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted to determine wheat injury following clomazone application in soybeans and fallow in North Dakota. Clomazone at recommended rates generally caused 10% or less visible chlorosis in spring wheat planted 11 to 12 mo after application or winter wheat planted 11 mo after application, although greater chlorosis was observed in two of seven location/year environments. Tillage preceding wheat planting increased chlorosis from clomazone residues in some environments. Clomazone residues reduced wheat grain yield only in three of seven location/year environments and usually at application rates of 1.4 kg ai ha-1 or greater. Severe drought prevailed during the study and probably increased clomazone persistence and wheat chlorosis. Drought also may have limited expression of grain yield reductions attributable to clomazone residues.

Keywords

Clomazone, 2-[(2-chlorophenyl)methyl]-4,4-dimethyl-3-isoxazolidinonesoybeans, Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘McCall’wheat, Triticum aestivum L. ‘Stoa’ and ‘Seward’Chemical fallowdissipationpersistencewheatTriticum aestivum
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 4 , Issue 4 , December 1990 , pp. 855 - 861
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Ahrens, W. H. 1989. incorporated clomazone in the fallow. Res. Rep. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 46:405.Google Scholar
2. Ahrens, W. H. 1990. Clomazone for weed control in chemical fallow. N. Dak. Farm Res. 48(3):in press.Google Scholar
3. Burnside, O. C. 1972. Tolerance of soybean cultivars to weed competition and herbicides. Weed Sci. 20:294–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Dexter, A. G., and Nalewaja, J. D. 1987. Response of several crops and weeds to herbicides. Res. Rep. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 44:122–123.Google Scholar
5. FMC Corp. 1990. Command 4 EC product label. FMC Corp., Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
6. Gallandt, E. R., Fay, P. K., and Inskeep, W. P. 1989. Clomazone dissipation in two Montana soils. Weed Technol. 3:146–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Halstead, S. J., and Harvey, R. G. 1985. Factors affecting off-site movement of FMC-57020. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 40:88.Google Scholar
8. Kapusta, G. 1987. Wheat tolerance to 1986 applied preplant incorporated and preemergence clomazone plus imazaquin or imazethapyr. Res. Rep. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 44:100.Google Scholar
9. Keifer, D. W., and El-Nagger, S. F. 1984. Interaction of FMC 57020 with the soil. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 39:79.Google Scholar
10. Loux, M. M., Liebl, R. A., and Slife, F. W. 1989. Availability and persistence of imazaquin, imazethapyr, and clomazone in soil. Weed Sci. 37:259–267.Google Scholar
11. Mills, J. A., and Witt, W. W. 1989. Efficacy, phytotoxicity, and persistence of imazaquin, imazethapyr, and clomazone in no-till double-crop soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 37:353–359.Google Scholar
12. Mills, J. A., Witt, W. W., and Barrett, M. 1989. Effects of tillage on the efficacy and persistence of clomazone in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 37:217–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Nalewaja, J. D., and Peterson, D. E. 1987. Preemergence weed control in soybean and dry bean. Res. Rep. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 44:126.Google Scholar
14. Pawlak, J. A., Kells, J. J., Barrett, M., and Meggitt, W. F. 1987. Effect of atrazine residue on soybean growth under three tillage systems and various herbicides. Weed Technol. 1:140–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Reynolds, D. B., Westerman, R. B., and Murray, D. S. 1985. Rotational crop response to DPX-F6025, dimethazone, and imazaquin following their application to soybeans. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 40:68.Google Scholar
16. Sandmann, G., and Böger, P. 1989. Inhibition of carotenoid biosynthesis by herbicides. Pages 25–44 in Böger, P. and Sandmann, G., eds. Target Sites of Herbicide Action. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
17. Stougaard, R. N., and Martin, A. R. 1986. Persistence of DPX-F6025, FMC-57020 and imazaquin in a no-till soybean-winter wheat rotation. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 41:9.Google Scholar
18. Thelen, K. D., Kells, J. J., and Penner, D. 1986. Rotational crop response and volatilization with FMC-57020. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 41:48.Google Scholar
19. Thelen, K. D., Kells, J. J., and Penner, D. 1988. Comparison of application methods and tillage practices on volatilization of clomazone. Weed Technol. 2:323–326.Google Scholar
20. Tymonko, J. M., and Guscar, H. L. 1984. Influence of soil properties on the activity of FMC 57020. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 39:76.Google Scholar
21. Weed Science Society of America. 1989. Herbicide Handbook, 6th Ed. WSSA, Champaign, IL.Google Scholar