Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T12:40:28.509Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Chemical Weed Control in Dryland and Irrigated Chickpea

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Drew J. Lyon  and
Robert G. Wilson
Drew J. Lyon*
Affiliation:
University of Nebraska Panhandle Research and Extension Center, 4502 Avenue I, Scottsbluff, NE 69361
Robert G. Wilson
Affiliation:
University of Nebraska Panhandle Research and Extension Center, 4502 Avenue I, Scottsbluff, NE 69361
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: dlyon1@unl.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field studies were conducted in 2003 and 2004 near Scottsbluff and Sidney, NE, to identify efficacious chemical weed-control options for irrigated and dryland chickpea production. Weed control had a greater relative effect on chickpea yield in the irrigated system than the dryland system, with yield from the hand-weeded check exceeding the nontreated check by 1,500% in the irrigated system and 87% in the dryland system. Imazethapyr, applied preemergence at the rate of 0.053 kg ai/ha, reduced plant height, delayed plant maturity, and caused leaf chlorosis. At Scottsbluff, preplant-incorporated ethalfluralin caused significant crop injury in 2003, but the ethalfluralin treatment also maintained weed densities 4 wk after crop emergence that were not significantly different than the hand-weeded check at both locations in 2003 and 2004. Treatments containing sulfentrazone provided a similar level of weed control but without any evidence of crop injury. Pendimethalin and pendimethalin + dimethenamid-P applied preemergence provided acceptable weed control in the irrigated system, where water was applied within 4 d after herbicide application, but did not provide acceptable control in the dryland system.

Keywords

Dimethenamid-PethalfluralinimazethapyrpendimethalinsulfentrazonechickpeaCicer arietinum L.Herbicidesgarbanzo beankabuli chickpeaWAEweeks after emergence
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 19 , Issue 4 , December 2005 , pp. 959 - 965
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1 Journal Series 14910 of the University of Nebraska Agricultural Research Division.

References

Literature Cited

Daugovish, O., Lyon, D. J., and Baltensperger, D. D. 1999. Cropping systems to control winter annual grasses in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Technol. 13:120–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felton, W. L., Marcellos, H., Alston, C., Martin, R. J., Backhouse, D., Burgess, L. W., and Herridge, D. F. 1998. Chickpea in wheat-based cropping systems of northern New South Wales II. Influence on biomass, grain yield, and crown rot in the following wheat crop. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 49:391–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grey, T. L., Walker, R. H., Wehtje, G. R., and Hancock, H. G. 1997. Sulfentrazone adsorption and mobility as affected by soil and pH. Weed Sci. 45:733–738.Google Scholar
Miller, P. R., McConkey, B. G., Clayton, G. W., Brandt, S. A., Staricka, J. A., Johnston, A. M., Lafond, G. P., Schatz, B. G., Baltensperger, D. D., and Neill, K. E. 2002. Pulse crop adaptation in the northern Great Plains. Agron. J. 94:261–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mittal, M. and Singh, O. P. 1983. Effect of different herbicides on the yield and yield contributing characters of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L). Legume Res. 6:53–54.Google Scholar
Murray, G. A., Kephart, K. D., O'Keeffe, L. E., Auld, D. L., and Callihan, R. H. 1987. Dry pea, lentil and chickpea production in Northern Idaho. University of Idaho Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 664, Moscow.Google Scholar
Nielsen, D. C. 2001. Production functions for chickpea, field pea, and lentil in the Central Great Plains. Agron. J. 93:563–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, G. A., Schlegel, A. J., Tanaka, D. L., and Jones, O. R. 1996. Precipitation use efficiency as affected by cropping and tillage systems. J. Prod. Agric. 9:180–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramakrishna, A., Rupela, O. P., Reddy, S. L. N., and Sivaramakrishna, C. 1992. Promising herbicides for weed control in chickpea. Trop. Pest Manage. 38:398–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[SAS] SAS Institute. 1999. SAS system for personal computers. Release 8.0. SAS Inst., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
Yasin, J. Z., Al-Thahabi, S., Aub-Irmaileh, B. E., Saxena, M. C., and Haddad, N. I. 1995. Chemical weed control in chickpea and lentil. Intern. J. Pest Manage. 41:60–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wicks, G. A., Wilson, R. G., Klein, R. N., Knezevic, S., Roeth, F. W., and Martin, A. R. 2000. Why RPA 2011772 injured corn in Nebraska in 1999. Proc. West. Soc. Weed Sci. 53:78–84.Google Scholar