Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T05:51:44.081Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cold Weather Application of Glyphosate for Garlic Mustard (Alliaria petiolata) Control

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Mark N. Frey
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture and Crop Science, Ohio State University, Wooster, OH 44691
Catherine P. Herms
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture and Crop Science, Ohio State University, Wooster, OH 44691
John Cardina*
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture and Crop Science, Ohio State University, Wooster, OH 44691
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: cardina.2@osu.edu

Abstract

Field studies were conducted from 2000 to 2002 to determine whether glyphosate applied during periods of low temperature (< 10 C) provides effective control of garlic mustard without injury to nontarget native herbs. A 1% glyphosate solution was applied on three dates between November and March in 2000 to 2001 and 2001 to 2002, when average daily temperatures ranged from −4.2 to 7 C. Glyphosate reduced the population density of prereproductive springtime garlic mustard infestations, regardless of application timing. During the primary bolting period (April to June), mortality of garlic mustard rosettes in sprayed plots was 87 to 94%, whereas mortality in nontreated plots was 12% in the first year and 41% in the second. Nontarget native herbaceous species were not injured by the cold-weather herbicide applications and exhibited higher springtime densities than in the nontreated plots. By targeting garlic mustard rosettes during the part of the year when most other plant species are dormant, managers can selectively control garlic mustard without damage to native herbs and, thereby, increase forest restoration success.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Current address: c/o Presidio Trust, P.O. Box 29052, San Francisco, CA 94129.

References

Literature Cited

Anderson, R. C., Dhillion, S. S., and Kelley, T. M. 1996. Aspects of the ecology of an invasive plant, garlic mustard (Alliaria petiolata), in central Illinois. Restor. Ecol. 4:181191.Google Scholar
Baskin, J. M. and Baskin, C. C. 1992. Seed-germination biology of the weedy biennial Alliaria petiolata . Nat. Areas J. 12:191197.Google Scholar
Blossey, B., Nuzzo, V. A., Hinz, H. L., and Gerber, E. 2001. Developing biological control of Alliaria petiolata (M. Bieb.) Cavara and Grande (garlic mustard). Nat. Areas J. 21:357367.Google Scholar
Braun, E. L. 1989. The Woody Plants of Ohio. Columbus, Ohio Ohio State University Press. 1362.Google Scholar
Byers, D. L. and Quinn, J. A. 1998. Demographic variation in Alliaria petiolata (Brassicaceae) in four contrasting habitats. J. Torrey Bot. Soc. 125:138149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavers, P. B., Heagy, M. I., and Kokron, R. F. 1979. The biology of Canadian weeds, 35: Alliaria petiolata (M. Bieb.) Cavara and Grande. Can. J. Plant Sci. 59:217229.Google Scholar
[CUIT] Columbia University Information Technology 2006. Introduced Species Summary Project. http://www.columbia.edu/itc/cerc/danoff-burg/invasion_bio/inv_spp_summ/Alliaria_petiolata.html. Accessed: January 2, 2007.Google Scholar
Devine, M. D. and Bandeen, J. D. 1983. Fate of glyphosate in Agropyron repens growing under low temperature conditions. Weed Res. 23:6976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drayton, B. and Primack, R. B. 1999. Garlic mustard as a model system for the study of issues in plant reintroductions. Bull. Ecol. Soc. Am. 77/Suppl. 3, Pt. 2:119.Google Scholar
Gleason, H. A. and Cronquist, A. 1963. Manual of Vascular Plants of Northeastern United States and adjacent Canada. New York D. Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
Sprague 2004. Weed control with fall and early preplant herbicide applications in no-till soybean. Weed Technol. 18:887892.Google Scholar
[INHF] Iowa Natural Heritage Foundation 2006. Some stewardship options. Woodland Health: Stewardship Options for Iowa Woodland Owners 1219. in http://www.inhf.org/woodland20book/pgs12-19.pdf. Accessed: January 2, 2007.Google Scholar
Loux, M. M. and Dobbels, A. F. Managing common chickweed and purple deadnettle with fall and early-spring herbicide treatments. Proc. N. Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 2001. 56:31.Google Scholar
McMullan, P. M. Influence of temperature after spraying on glyphosate control of quackgrass [Elytrigia repens (L.) Nevski] previously exposed to light frost. Can. J. Plant Sci. 1994. 74:667669.Google Scholar
McCarthy, B. C. and Hanson, S. L. An assessment of the allelopathic potential of the invasive weed Alliaria petiolata (Brassicaceae). Castanea 1998. 63:6873.Google Scholar
Meekins, J. F. and McCarthy, B. C. Competitive ability of Alliaria petiolata (garlic mustard, Brassicaceae), an invasive, nonindigenous herb. Int. J. Plant Sci. 1999. 160:743752.Google Scholar
Meekins, J. F. and McCarthy, B. C. Responses of the biennial forest herb Alliaria petiolata to variation in population density, nutrient addition and light availability. J. Ecol. 2000. 88:447463.Google Scholar
Nuzzo, V. A. McKnight, B.N., ed. Distribution and spread of the invasive biennial Alliaria petiolata (garlic mustard) in North America. in. Biological Pollution: The control and impact of invasive exotic species 1993. Indianapolis Indiana Academy of Science. Pages 137145.Google Scholar
Nuzzo, V. A. 1996. Impact of dormant season herbicide treatment on the alien herb garlic mustard [Alliaria petiolata (Bieb.) Cavara and Grande] and groundlayer vegetation. Trans. Ill. State Acad. Sci. 89:2536.Google Scholar
Nuzzo, V. A. 1999. Invasion pattern of the herb garlic mustard (Alliaria petiolata) in high quality forests. Biol. Invasions 1:169179.Google Scholar
Prati, D. and Bossdorf, O. 2004. Allelopathic inhibition of germination by Alliaria petiolata (Brassicaceae). Am. J. Bot. 91:285288.Google Scholar
Reddy, K. N. 2000. Factors affecting toxicity, absorption, and translocation of glyphosate in redvine (Brunnichia ovata). Weed Technol. 14:457462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, H. A. and Boddrell, J. E. 1983. Seed survival and periodicity of seedling emergence in 8 species of Cruciferae. Ann. Appl. Biol. 103:301304.Google Scholar
SAS Institute 1999. SAS/STAT User's Guide, Version 8. Cary, NC SAS Institute.Google Scholar
Scott, D. R. 2000. Aspects of the ecology of garlic mustard, Alliaria petiolata (Bieb) Cavara and Grande, in Ohio. Columbus, OH The Ohio State University. 1175.Google Scholar
Sharma, S. D. and Singh, M. 2001. Environmental factors affecting absorption and bio-efficacy of glyphosate in Florida beggarweed (Desmodium tortuosum) Crop Prot. 20:511516.Google Scholar
Shuster, W. D., Herms, C. P., Frey, M. N., Doohan, D. J., and Cardina, J. 2005. Comparison of survey methods for an invasive plant at the subwatershed level. Biol. Invasions. 7:393403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Susko, D. J. and Lovett-Doust, L. 1998. Variable patterns of seed maturation and abortion in Alliaria petiolata (Brassicaceae). Can. J. Botany 76:16771686.Google Scholar
Texasinvasives.org 2005. Texas Invasives: Alliaria petiolata—Plant Detail Page. http://www.texasinvasives.org/Invasives_Database/Results/Detail.aspSymbolALPE4. Accessed: January 2, 2007.Google Scholar
Yost, S. E., Antenen, S., and Hartvigsen, G. 1991. The vegetation of the wave hill natural area, Bronx, New York. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 118:312325.Google Scholar