Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T10:47:55.231Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Combinations of Corn Gluten Meal, Clove Oil, and Sweep Cultivation are Ineffective for Weed Control in Organic Peanut Production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

W. Carroll Johnson III ,
Mark A. Boudreau  and
Jerry W. Davis
W. Carroll Johnson III*
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS, Tifton Campus, P. O. Box 748, Tifton, GA 31793-0748
Mark A. Boudreau
Affiliation:
Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602
Jerry W. Davis
Affiliation:
University of Georgia, Griffin Campus, Griffin, GA 30223
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: Carroll.Johnson@ars.usda.gov
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Weed control in organic peanut is difficult and lack of residual weed control complicates weed management efforts. Weed management systems using corn gluten meal in combination with clove oil and sweep cultivation were evaluated in a series of irrigated field trials. Corn gluten meal applied in a 30 cm band over the row at PRE, sequentially at PRE+2 wk after emergence, and PRE+2wk+4wk did not adequately control annual grasses and smallflower morningglory. Similarly, a banded application of clove oil applied POST did not adequately control weeds. The only treatment that improved overall weed control was sweep cultivation. Peanut yields were not measured in 2006 due to heavy baseline weed densities and overall poor weed control. Peanut yields were measured in 2007 and were not affected by any weed control treatment due to poor efficacy. While sweep cultivation improved weed control, weeds were controlled only in the row middles and surviving weeds in-row reduced peanut yield. Even when used in combination with sweep cultivation, corn gluten meal and clove oil were ineffective and offer little potential in a weed management system for organic peanut production.

El control de malezas en maní orgánico es difícil, y la carencia de control residual complica aún más los esfuerzos para el manejo de malezas. Se evaluaron sistemas de manejo de malezas incluyendo harina de gluten de maíz en combinación con aceite de trébol y con cultivadores de barrido en una serie de ensayos de campo bajo riego. El gluten de maíz aplicado en una banda de 30 cm sobre la línea de siembra en PRE, secuencialmente a PRE+2 semanas (wk) después de la siembra, y PRE+2wk+4wk no controló adecuadamente malezas gramíneas anuales ni Jacquemontia tamnifolia. Similarmente, una aplicación en banda de aceite de trébol realizada POST no controló adecuadamente las malezas. El único tratamiento que mejoró en forma general el control de malezas fue el cultivo de barrido. Los rendimientos del maní no fueron medidos en 2006 debido a las altas densidades de malezas iniciales y al pobre control de malezas. Los rendimientos del maní se determinaron en 2007 y no fueron afectados por ninguno de los tratamientos de malezas debido a su baja eficacia. Mientras que el cultivo de barrido mejoró el control, las malezas fueron controladas solamente en las zonas centrales entre las líneas de siembra y las malezas que sobrevivieron sobre las líneas de siembra redujeron el rendimiento del maní. Inclusive al usarse en combinación con cultivo de barrido, el gluten de maíz y el aceite de trébol no fueron efectivos y ofrecen muy poco potencial de control en sistemas de manejo de malezas para la producción orgánica de maní.

Keywords

Clove oilcorn gluten mealcrowfootgrass, Dactyloctenium aegyptium (L.) Willdgoosegrass, Eleusine indica (L.) Gaertnsmallflower morningglory, Jacquemontia tamnifolia (L.) Grisebsouthern crabgrass, Digitaria ciliaris (Retz.) KoelTexas millet, Urochloa texana (Buckl.) R. Websterpeanut, Arachis hypogaea L.Clove oilcorn gluten mealcultivationmechanical weed controlorganic peanut productionorganic weed control
Type
Notes
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 27 , Issue 2 , June 2013 , pp. 417 - 421
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Abouziena, H.F.H., Omar, A.A.M., Sharma, S. D., and Singh, M. 2009. Efficacy comparison of some new natural-product herbicides for weed control at two growth stages. Weed Technol. 23:431–437.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 2009. Georgia agricultural facts – 2009 edition. USDA-NASS. http://www.nass.usda.gov/Statistics_by_State/Georgia/Publications/Annual_Statistical_Bulletin/2009/Section5.pdf. Accessed December 4, 2012.Google Scholar
Bainard, L. D., Isman, M. B., and Upadhyaya, M. K. 2006. Phytotoxicity of clove oil and its primary constituent eugenol and the role of leaf epicuticular wax in the susceptibility to these essential oils. Weed Sci. 54:833–837.Google Scholar
Bingaman, B. R. and Christians, N. E. 1995. Greenhouse screening of corn gluten meal as a natural control product for broadleaf and grass weeds. HortScience. 30:1256–1259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, N. S. and Brennan, E. B. 2006. Burning nettle, common purslane, and rye response to a clove oil herbicide. Weed Technol. 20:646–650.Google Scholar
Branch, W. D. 2002. Registration of ‘Georgia-01R' peanut. Crop Sci. 42:1750–1751.Google Scholar
Branch, W. D. and Fletcher, S. M. 2001. No-pesticide preliminary yield trials in peanut. Peanut Sci. 28:21–24.Google Scholar
Christians, N. E. 1993. The use of corn gluten meal as a natural preemergence weed control in turf. Pages 284–290 in Carrow, R. N., Christians, N. E., and Shearman, R. C., eds. International Turfgrass Society Research Journal 7. Overland Park, KS Intertec.Google Scholar
Dayan, F. E., Cantrell, C. L., and Duke, S. O. 2009. Natural products in crop protection. Bioorgan. Med. Chem. 17:4022–4034.Google Scholar
Dilley, C. A., Nonnecke, G. R., and Christians, N. E. 2002. Corn-based extracts to manage weeds and provide nitrogen in matted-row strawberry culture. HortScience. 37:1053–1056.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, G. J. and Bellinder, R. R. 2009. The potential use of vinegar and a clove oil herbicide for weed control in sweet corn, potato, and onion. Weed Technol. 23:120–128.Google Scholar
Evans, G. J., Bellinder, R. R., and Goffinet, M. C. 2009. Herbicidal effects of vinegar and a clove oil product on redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus) and velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti). Weed Technol. 23:292–299.Google Scholar
Gardner, D. S., Christians, N. E., and Bingaman, B. R. 1997. Pendimethalin and corn gluten meal combinations to control turf weeds. Crop Sci. 37:1875–1877.Google Scholar
Guerena, M. and Adam, K. 2008. Peanuts: Organic Production. National Sustainable Agriculture Information Service — National Center for Appropriate Technology (NCAT). https://attra.ncat.org/attra-pub/summaries/summary.php?pub=95. Accessed September 10, 2012.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. C. III, Boudreau, M. A., and Davis, J. W. 2012a. Implements and cultivation frequency to improve in-row weed control in organic peanut production. Weed Technol. 26:334–340.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. C. III, Boudreau, M. A., and Davis, J. W. 2012b. Cultural practices to improve in-row weed control with cultivation in organic peanut production. Weed Technol. 26:718–723.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. C. III and Mullinix, B. G. Jr. 2008. Potential weed management systems for organic peanut production. Peanut Sci. 35:67–72.Google Scholar
Law, D. M., Rowell, A. B., Snyder, J. C., and Williams, M. A. 2006. Weed control efficacy of organic mulches in two organically managed bell pepper production systems. HortTechnology. 16:225–232.Google Scholar
Liu, D. L. and Christians, N. E. 1997. Inhibitory activity of corn gluten hydrolysate on monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous species. HortScience. 32:243–245.Google Scholar
Russo, V. M. and Webber, C. L. III. 2012. Peanut pod, seed, and oil yield for biofuels following conventional and organic production systems. Ind Crop. Prod. 39:113–119.Google Scholar
Smith, A. N., Reberg-Horton, C., Place, G. T., Meijer, A. D., Arellano, C., and Mueller, J. P. 2011. Rolled rye mulch for weed suppression in organic no-tillage soybeans. Weed Sci. 59:224–231.Google Scholar
Unruh, J. B., Christians, N. E., and Horner, H. T. 1997. Herbicidal effects of the dipeptide alaninyl-alanine on perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) seedlings. Crop Sci. 37:208–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wann, D. Q., Tubbs, R. S., Johnson, W. C. III, Smith, A. R., Smith, N. B., and Culbreath, A. K. 2011. Cultivation frequency and duration effects on productivity and economics of peanut in organic management. Peanut Sci. 38:101–110.Google Scholar
Webber, C. L. III, Shrefler, J. W., and Taylor, M. J. 2007. Corn gluten meal as an alternative weed control option for spring-transplanted onions. Int. J. Veg. Sci. 13:17–33.Google Scholar