Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:54:12.640Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Common Cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) Interference in Snap Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Philip E. Neary  and
Bradley A. Majek
Philip E. Neary
Affiliation:
Gloucester Co. Coop. Ext., Delsea Dr., Clayton, NJ 08312
Bradley A. Majek
Affiliation:
Assoc. Spec., Rutgers Univ., RD ♯5, Box 232, Bridgeton, NJ 08302
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The effect of common cocklebur interference on snap beans was investigated at Bridgeton, NJ, in 1987 and 1988. Snap bean yields were reduced by increasing weed densities. Yields were reduced 8 to 44% in 1987 and 2 to 55% in 1988 by full-season in-row weed densities ranging from 0.5 to 8/m2. One weed and 4 weeds/m2 were the damage-threshold populations of common cocklebur with full-season interference in 1987 and 1988, respectively. The weed-free requirement, after planting, was to the unifoliolate stage of snap beans. Common cocklebur at 4 weeds/m2 did not affect yield when snap beans were maintained weed free until the unifoliolate stage of snap beans. The critical duration of interference for common cocklebur emerging with snap beans was between the emergence and full-bloom stage of snap beans. Snap bean yield was not reduced with weed removal at full bloom.

Keywords

Common cocklebur, Xanthium strumarium L. ♯3 XANSTsnap bean, Phaseolus vulgaris L.Critical duration of interferencedamage thresholdweed-free requirementXANST
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 4 , Issue 4 , December 1990 , pp. 743 - 748
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Barrentine, W. L. 1974. Common cocklebur competition in soybeans. Weed Sci. 22:600–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Bloomberg, J. R., Kirkpatrick, B. C., and Wax, L. M. 1982. Competition of common cocklebur (Xanthium pensylvanicum) with soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 30:507–513.Google Scholar
3. Coble, H. D., Williams, F. M., and Ritter, R. L. 1981. Common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia) interference in soybeans (Glycine max) Weed Sci. 29:339–342.Google Scholar
4. Davis, R. G., Johnson, W. C., and Wood, F. G. 1967. Weed root. profiles. Agron. J. 59:555–558.Google Scholar
5. Davis, R. G., Wiese, A. F., and Pafford, J. L. 1965. Root moisture extraction profiles of various weeds. Weeds 13:98–100.Google Scholar
6. Dawson, J. H. 1964. Competition between irrigated field beans and annual weeds. Weeds 12:206–208.Google Scholar
7. Dubetz, S., and Mahalle, P. S. 1969. Effect of soil water stress on bush beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) at three stages of growth. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 94:479–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Evanylo, G. K., and Wilson, H. P. 1988. Common ragweed in snap beans. Abstr. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 42:209.Google Scholar
9. Fennimore, S. A., Mitich, L. W., and Radosevich, S. R. 1984. Interference among bean (Phaseolus vulgaris), barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli), and black nightshade (Solanum nigrum). Weed Sci. 32:336–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Geddes, R. D., Scott, H. D., and Oliver, L. R. 1979. Growth and water use by common cocklebur (Xanthium pensylvanicum) and soybeans (Glycine max) under field conditions. Weed Sci. 27:206–212.Google Scholar
11. Knake, E. L., and Slife, F. W. 1969. Effect of time of giant foxtail removal from corn and soybeans. Weed Sci. 17:281–283.Google Scholar
12. MacKay, D. C., and Eaves, C. A. 1962. Influence of irrigation treatments on yields and on fertilizer utilization by sweet corn and snap beans. Can. J. Plant Sci. 42:219–228.Google Scholar
13. McWhorter, C. G., and Hartwig, E. E. 1972. Competition of johnsongrass and cocklebur with six soybean varieties. Weed Sci. 20:56–59.Google Scholar
14. Oliver, L. R. 1975. Today's weed–common cocklebur. Weeds Today 6(4):22.Google Scholar
15. Oliver, L. R., and Buchanan, G. A. 1986. Weed competition and economic thresholds. p. 72–91 in Camper, N. D., ed. Research Methods in Weed Science. 3rd ed. South. Weed Sci. Soc., Champaign, IL.Google Scholar
16. Robins, J. S., and Domingo, C. E. 1956. Moisture deficits in relation to the growth and development of dry beans. Agron. J. 48:67–70.Google Scholar
17. Shipley, J. L., and Wiese, A. F. 1969. Economics of weed control in sorghum and wheat. Tex. Agric. Exp. Stn. MP 909.Google Scholar
18. Shurtleff, J. L., and Coble, H. D. 1985. Interference of certain broadleaf weed species in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 33:654–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Stoller, E. W., and Woolley, J. T. 1985. Competition for light by broadleaf weeds in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 33:199–202.Google Scholar
20. Stoller, E. W., Harrison, S. K., Wax, L. M., Regnier, E. E., and Nafziger, E. D. 1987. Weed interference in soybeans (Glycine max). Rev. Weed Sci. 3:155–181.Google Scholar
21. Vengris, J., and Stacewicz-Sapuncakis, M. 1971. Common purslane competition in table beets and snap beans. Weed Sci. 19:4–6.Google Scholar
22. Waldrep, T. W., and McLaughlin, R. D. 1969. Cocklebur competition and control. The Soybean Farmer 3:26–30.Google Scholar
23. Williams, C. F., Crabtree, G., Mack, H. J., and Laws, W. D. 1973. Effect of spacing on weed competition in sweet corn, snap beans, and onions. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 98:526–529.Google Scholar