Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T06:17:25.409Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Common Windgrass (Apera spica-venti) Control in Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Andrew J. Chomas
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824-1325
James J. Kells
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824-1325

Abstract

Common windgrass is an increasing winter wheat weed problem in Michigan. Postplant incorporated trifluralin, applied at 0.56 kg/ha, reduced common windgrass density by 85% in small plot research and by 70% or greater in production scale sites. In 1994–1995, incorporation implements had no effect on initial wheat density. However in a spring 1995 evaluation, significant wheat injury and stand reduction occurred in response to trifluralin incorporation. Incorporation implement effects on wheat injury were in the order: flex-tine harrow > spike tooth drag > rotary hoe. When trifluralin was shallowly incorporated over wheat planted at least 5 cm deep, no significant wheat injury was observed at any site. Injury from postplant incorporated trifluralin was related to shallow planting depth.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Aamisepp, A. and Avholm, K. 1970. Apera spica-venti in Sweden: occurrence, biology, and control. In Proceedings of the 10th British Weed Control Conference. Nottingham: Boots Pure Drug. pp. 5055.Google Scholar
Ashford, R., McKercher, R. B., and Holm, F. A. 1990. Systems of Weed Control in Wheat in North America. Champaign, IL: Weed Science Society of America. Chap. 17. pp. 359373.Google Scholar
Beal, W. J. 1896. Grasses of North America. Volume 2. New York: Henry Holt and Company. pp. 356357.Google Scholar
Cessna, A. J., Grover, R., Smith, A. E., and Hunter, J. H. 1988. Uptake and dissipation of trialliate and trifluralin vapors by wheat under field conditions. Can. J. Plant Sci. 68: 11531157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copeland, L. O., Vitosh, M. L., Pierce, F. J., and Kells, J. J. 1989. Wheat: a production guide for Michigan. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Extension Bull. E-2188. 16 p.Google Scholar
Duseja, D. R., Akunuri, H. V., and Holmes, E. E. 1980. Trifluralin soil behavior: persistence, movement, and weed control. J. Environ. Sci. Health A 15: 6599.Google Scholar
Gereau, R. E. and Rabeler, R. K. 1984. Eurasian introductions to the Michigan flora. II. 23: 5156.Google Scholar
Golab, T., Althaus, W. A., and Wooten, H. L. 1979. Fate of [14C] trifluralin in soil. J. Agric. Food Chem. 27: 163179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grover, R., Smith, A. E., Shewchuk, S. R., Cessna, A. J., and Hunter, J. H. 1988. Fate of trifluralin and triallate applied as a mixture of a wheat field. J. Environ. Qual. 17: 543550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koch, K. 1968. Environmental factors affecting the germination of some annual grasses. In Proceedings of the 9th British Weed Control Conference. Nottingham: Boots Pure Drug. pp. 1418.Google Scholar
McNeill, J. 1981. Apera, silky-bent or windgrass, an important weed genus recently discovered in Ontario, Canada. Can. J. Sci. 61: 479485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, S. D. and Nalewaja, J. D. 1983. Fall preplant trifluralin (Treflan) applications in wheat. N. D. Farm Res. 41 (2): 3134.Google Scholar
Morrison, I. N., Nawolsky, K. M., Marshall, G. M., and Smith, A. E. 1989. Recovery of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum) injured by trifluralin. Weed Sci. 37: 784789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Northam, F. E. and Callihan, R. H. 1992. The windgrasses (Apera Adans., Poaceae) in North America. Weed Technol. 6: 445450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Sullivan, P. A., Weiss, G. M., and Friesen, D. 1985. Tolerance of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) to trifluralin deep-incorporated in the autumn or spring. Weed Res. 25: 275280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, B. M. and McKercher, R. B. 1985. Wheat and triticale root development as affected by trifluralin. Can. J. Plant Sci. 65: 723729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parochetti, J. V. and Hein, E. R. 1973. Volatility and photodecomposition of trifluralin, benefin, and nitralin. Weed Sci. 21: 469473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabeler, R. K. and Crowder, C. A. 1985. Eurasian introductions to the Michigan flora. III. The Michigan Botanist 24: 125127.Google Scholar
Robinson, D. E., Anderson, J., and Miller, B. 1976. Trifluralin as a postplant preemergence incorporated application for foxtail (Alopecurus, Setaria) control in wheat and barley. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 31: 149150.Google Scholar
Wallgren, B. and Avholm, K. 1978. Dormancy and germination of Apera spica-veni L. and Alopecurus myosuroides Huds. seeds. Swedish J. Agric. 8: 1115.Google Scholar
Warwick, S. I., Black, L. D., and Zilkey, B. F. 1985. Biology of Canadian weeds. 72. Apera spica-venti . Can. J. Plant Sci. 65: 711721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zemanek, J. 1980. The control of silky bentgrass and dicotyledonous weeds in cereal crops Wheat Documenta. Basle, Switzerland: Ciba Geigy, Ltd. pp. 4649.Google Scholar
Zilkey, B. F. and Capell, B. B. 1990. Loose silky bentgrass (Apera spica-venti) control in fall rye (Secale cereale). Weed Technol. 4: 496499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar