Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:35:12.492Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Control of downy brome (Bromus tectorum) and Japanese brome (Bromus japonicus) using glyphosate and four graminicides: effects of herbicide rate, plant size, species, and accession

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2019

Emily P. Metier
Affiliation:
Graduate Research Assistant, Department of Land Resources and Environmental Science, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, USA
Erik A. Lehnhoff
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, Department of Entomology, Plant Pathology and Weed Science, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM, USA
Jane Mangold
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Department of Land Resources and Environmental Science, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, USA
Matthew J. Rinella
Affiliation:
Range Management Specialist, USDA-ARS Fort Keogh LARRL, Miles City, MT, USA
Lisa J. Rew*
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Land Resources and Environmental Science, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Lisa Rew, Montana State University, Department of Land Resources and Environmental Science, 334 Leon Johnson Hall, P.O. Box 173120, Bozeman, MT59717-3120. (Email: lrew@montana.edu)

Abstract

Nonnative annual brome invasion is a major problem in many ecosystems throughout the semiarid Intermountain West, decreasing production and biodiversity. Herbicides are the most widely used control technique but can have negative effects on co-occurring species. Graminicides, or grass-specific herbicides, may be able to control annual bromes without harming forbs and shrubs in restoration settings, but limited studies have addressed this potential. This study focused on evaluating the efficacy of glyphosate and four graminicides to control annual bromes, specifically downy brome and Japanese brome. In a greenhouse, glyphosate and four graminicides (clethodim, sethoxydim, fluazifop-P-butyl, and quizalofop-P-ethyl) were applied at two rates to downy brome plants of different heights (Experiment 1) and to three accessions of downy brome and Japanese brome of one height (Experiment 2). All herbicides reduced downy brome biomass, with most effective control on plants of less than 11 cm and with less than 12 leaves. Overall, quizalofop-P-ethyl and fluazifop-P-butyl treatments were most effective, and glyphosate and sethoxydim treatments least effective. Accessions demonstrated variable response to herbicides: the downy brome accession from the undisturbed site was more susceptible to herbicides than downy brome from the disturbed accession and Japanese brome accessions. These results demonstrate the potential for graminicides to target these annual bromes in ecosystems where they are growing intermixed with desired forbs and shrubs.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Associate Editor: Michael Walsh, University of Sydney

References

Baker, WL, Garner, J, Lyon, P (2009) Effect of imazapic on cheatgrass and native plants in Wyoming big sagebrush restoration for Gunnison sage-grouse. Nat Areas J 29:204209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ball, DA, Frost, SM, Bennett, LH (2007) ACCase-inhibitor herbicide resistance in downy brome (Bromus tectorum) in Oregon. Weed Sci 55:9194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barroso, J, Gourlie, J (2019) Resistance to group II herbicides in downy brome. Pages 3536in 2019 Dryland Field Day Abstracts. Pullman, WA: Washington State University ExtensionGoogle Scholar
Bates, D, Maechler, M, Bolker, B, Walker, S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 67:148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belnap, J, Phillips, SL (2001) Soil biota in an ungrazed grassland: response to annual grass (Bromus tectorum) invasion. Ecol Appl 11:12611275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackshaw, RE (1993) Downy brome (Bromus tectorum) density and relative time of emergence affects interference in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Sci 41:551556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, BA (2009) Regional analysis of the impacts of climate change on cheatgrass invasion shows potential risk and opportunity. Global Change Biol 15:196208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, BA, Curtis, CA, Chambers, JC (2016) Bromus response to climate and projected changes with climate change. Pages 257274in Exotic Brome-Grasses in Arid and Semiarid Ecosystems of the Western US. Cham, Switzerland: SpringerCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewster, BD, Spinney, RL (1989) Control of seedling grasses with postemergence grass herbicides. Weed Technol 3:3943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, ML, Brown, CS, Chambers, JC, D’Antonio, CM, Keeley, JE, Belnap, J (2016) Exotic annual Bromus invasions: comparisons among species and ecoregions in the western United States. Pages 1160 in Exotic Brome-Grasses in Arid and Semiarid Ecosystems of the Western US. Cham, Switzerland: SpringerCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, ML, D’Antonio, CM, Richardson, DM, Grace, JB, Keeley, JE, DiTomaso, JM, Hobbs, RJ, Pellant, M, Pyke, D (2004) Effects of invasive alien plants on fire regimes. BioScience 54:677688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bykova, O, Sage, RF (2012) Winter cold tolerance and the geographic range separation of Bromus tectorum and Bromus rubens, two severe invasive species in North America. Global Change Biol 18:36543663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, JC, Roundy, BA, Blank, RR, Meyer, SE, Whittaker, A (2007) What makes Great Basin sagebrush ecosystems invasible by Bromus tectorum? Ecol Monogr 77:117145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clay, D, Dixon, F, Willoughby, I (2006) Efficacy of graminicides on grass weed species of forestry. Crop Prot 25:10391050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, RD, Anderson, VJ (2004) Increasing native diversity of cheatgrass-dominated rangeland through assisted succession. J Range Manage 57:203210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Délye, C, Wang, T, Darmency, H (2002) An isoleucine-leucine substitution in chloroplastic acetyl-CoA carboxylase from green foxtail (Setaria viridis L. Beauv.) is responsible for resistance to the cyclohexanedione herbicide sethoxydim. Planta 214:421427CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DiTomaso, JM, Brooks, ML, Allen, EB, Minnich, R, Rice, PM, Kyser, GB (2006) Control of invasive weeds with prescribed burning. Weed Technol 20:535548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, CA, Jachetta, JJ, Brown, ML, Carrithers, VF, Clark, JK, DiTomaso, JM, Lym, RG, McDaniel, KC, Renz, MJ, Rice, PM (2004) Assessing the economic, environmental, and societal losses from invasive plants on rangeland and wildlands. Weed Technol 18:14111416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehlert, KA, Mangold, JM, Engel, RE (2014) Integrating the herbicide imazapic and the fungal pathogen Pyrenophora semeniperda to control Bromus tectorum. Weed Res 54:418424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foy, CL, Witt, HL (1992) Annual grass control in alfalfa (Medicago sativa) with postemergence graminicides. Weed Technol 6:938948CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Francis, MG, Pyke, DA (1996) Crested wheatgrass-cheatgrass seedling competition in a mixed-density design. J Range Manage 49:432438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Germino, MJ, Belnap, J, Stark, JM, Allen, EB, Rau, BM (2016) Ecosystem impacts of exotic annual invaders in the genus Bromus. Pages 6195in Exotic Brome-Grasses in Arid and Semiarid Ecosystems of the Western US. Cham, Switzerland: SpringerCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haferkamp, MR, Heitschmidt, RK (1999) Japanese brome impacts on western wheatgrass in Northern Great Plains rangelands: an update. Great Plains Res 9:315327Google Scholar
Haferkamp, MR, Young, JA, Grings, EE, Karl, MG, Heitschmidt, RK, MacNeil, MD (1992) Japanese brome in the northern Great Plains. Pages 1821in Proceedings—Ecology And Management of Annual Rangelands, Boise, ID. Gen. Tech. Rep INT-GTR-313. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research StationGoogle Scholar
Hardegree, SP, Moffet, CA, Flerchinger, GN, Cho, J, Roundy, BA, Jones, TA, James, JJ, Clark, PE, Pierson, FB (2013) Hydrothermal assessment of temporal variability in seedbed microclimate. Rangeland Ecol Manag 66:127135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harmoney, K (2007) Grazing and burning Japanese brome (Bromus japonicus) on mixed grass rangelands. Rangeland Ecol Manag 60:479486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, JJ, Sheley, RL, Erickson, T, Rollins, KS, Taylor, MH, Dixon, KW (2013) A systems approach to restoring degraded drylands. J Appl Ecol 50:730739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelley, WK, Fernandez-Gimenez, ME, Brown, CS (2013) Managing downy brome (Bromus tectorum) in the central Rockies: land manager perspectives. Invasive Plant Sci Manag 6:521535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knapp, PA (1996) Cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum L) dominance in the Great Basin Desert: history, persistence, and influences to human activities. Global Environ Change 6:3752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kukorelli, G, Reisinger, P, Pinke, G (2013) ACCase inhibitor herbicides—selectivity, weed resistance and fitness cost: a review. Int J Pest Manag 59:165173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kyser, GB, Wilson, RG, Zhang, J, DiTomaso, JM (2013) Herbicide-assisted restoration of Great Basin sagebrush steppe infested with medusahead and downy brome. Rangeland Ecol Manage 66:588596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, NC, Hauvermale, AL, Burke, IC (2018) Downy brome (Bromus tectorum) vernalization: variation and genetic controls. Weed Sci 66:310316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehnhoff, EA, Rew, LJ, Mangold, J, Seipel, T, Ragen, D (2019) Integrated management of cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum) with sheep grazing and herbicide. Agronomy 9:315336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenth, RV (2016) Least-squares means: the R package lsmeans. J Stat Softw 69:33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lesica, P (2012) Manual of Montana Vascular Plants. 1st ed. Fort Worth, TX: BRIT PressGoogle Scholar
Mangold, J, Parkinson, H, Duncan, C, Rice, P, Davis, E, Menalled, F (2013) Downy brome (Bromus tectorum) control with imazapic on Montana grasslands. Invasive Plant Sci Manag 6:554558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marquardt, PT, Johnson, WG (2013) Influence of clethodim application timing on control of volunteer corn in soybean. Weed Technol 27:645648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masters, RA, Sheley, RL (2001) Principles and practices for managing rangeland invasive plants. J Range Manage 54:502517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metier, EP, Rew, LJ, Rinella, MJ (2018) Establishing Wyoming big sagebrush in annual brome-invaded landscapes with seeding and herbicides. Rangeland Ecol Manage 71:705713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monaco, TA, Mangold, JM, Mealor, BA, Mealor, RD, Brown, CS (2017) Downy brome control and impacts on perennial grass abundance: a systematic review spanning 64 years. Rangeland Ecol Manage 70:396404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monsen, SB, Stevens, R, Shaw, NL (2004) Restoring Western Ranges and Wildlands. Volume 1. Fort Collins, CO: Rocky Mountain Research Station. 294 pGoogle Scholar
Morris, C, Monaco, TA, Rigby, CW (2009) Variable impacts of imazapic rate on downy brome (Bromus tectorum) and seeded species in two rangeland communities. Invasive Plant Sci Manag 2:110119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, C, Morris, LR, Surface, C (2017) Spring glyphosate application for selective control of downy brome (Bromus tectorum) on Great Basin rangelands. Weed Technol 30:297302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mueller-Warrant, G, Mallory-Smith, C, Hendrickson, P (1999) Non-target site resistance to ALS inhibitors in downy brome. Page 16in Proceedings of the Western Society of Weed Science. Colorado Spring, CO: Weed Science Society of AmericaGoogle Scholar
Nasri, M, Doescher, PS (1995) Effect of competition by cheatgrass on shoot growth of Idaho fescue. J Range Manage 48:402405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norton, JB, Monaco, TA, Norton, JM, Johnson, DA, Jones, TA (2004) Soil morphology and organic matter dynamics under cheatgrass and sagebrush-steppe plant communities. J Arid Environ 57:445466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogle, SM, Ojima, D, Reiners, WA (2004) Modeling the impact of exotic annual brome grasses on soil organic carbon storage in a northern mixed-grass prairie. Biol. Invasions 6:365377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogle, SM, Reiners, WA, Gerow, KG (2003) Impacts of exotic annual brome grasses (Bromus spp.) on ecosystem properties of northern mixed grass prairie. Am Midl Nat 149:4658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, SM, Sieg, CH, Gehring, CA (2011) Rehabilitating downy brome (Bromus tectorum) invaded shrublands using imazapic and seeding with native shrubs. Invasive Plant Sci Manag 4:223233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, K, Mallory‐Smith, C (2004) Physiological and molecular basis for ALS inhibitor resistance in Bromus tectorum biotypes. Weed Res 44:7177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radosevich, SR, Holt, JS, Ghersa, CM (2007) Ecology of Weeds and Invasive Plants: Relationship to Agriculture and Natural Resource Management. 3rd Edition. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. 454 pCrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team (2016) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical ComputingGoogle Scholar
Rimer, R, Evans, R (2006) Invasion of downy brome (Bromus tectorum L.) causes rapid changes in the nitrogen cycle. Am Midl Nat 156:252258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rydrych, D, Muzik, T (1968) Downy brome competition and control in dryland wheat. Agron J 60:279280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sperry, LJ, Belnap, J, Evans, RD (2006) Bromus tectorum invasion alters nitrogen dynamics in an undisturbed arid grassland ecosystem. Ecology 87:603615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vasquez, E, Sheley, R, Svejcar, T (2009) Nitrogen enhances the competitive ability of cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum) relative to native grasses. Invasive Plant Sci Manag 1:287295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vermeire, LT, Heitschmidt, RK, Haferkamp, MR (2008) Vegetation response to seven grazing treatments in the Northern Great Plains. Agric Ecosyst Environ 125:111119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waller, S, Schmidt, D (1983) Improvement of eastern Nebraska tallgrass range using atrazine or glyphosate. J Range Manage 36:8790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whisenant, SG (1990) Changing fire frequencies on Idaho’s Snake River Plains: ecological and management implications. Pages 410in McArthur, ED, Romney, EM, Smith, SD, Tueller, PT, eds. Proceedings – Symposium on Cheatgrass Invasion, Shrub Die-Off, and Other Aspects of Shrub Biology and Management. General Technical Report INT-GTR-276. Ogden, UT: USDA Forest ServiceGoogle Scholar
Whitson, TD, Koch, DW (1998) Control of downy brome (Bromus tectorum) with herbicides and perennial grass competition. Weed Technol 12:391396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Metier et al. supplementary materials

Metier et al. supplementary materials

Download Metier et al. supplementary materials(File)
File 76.6 KB