Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:37:45.191Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Control of Glyphosate-Resistant Common Waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus var. rudis) in Soybean in Ontario

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 September 2017

Mike G. Schryver ,
Nader Soltani ,
David C. Hooker ,
Darren E. Robinson ,
Patrick J. Tranel  and
Peter H. Sikkema
Mike G. Schryver
Affiliation:
Graduate Student, Adjunct Professor, Associate Professor, Associate Professor, and Professor, Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph, 120 Main Street, East, Ridgetown, ON N0P 2C0, Canada
Nader Soltani*
Affiliation:
Graduate Student, Adjunct Professor, Associate Professor, Associate Professor, and Professor, Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph, 120 Main Street, East, Ridgetown, ON N0P 2C0, Canada
David C. Hooker
Affiliation:
Graduate Student, Adjunct Professor, Associate Professor, Associate Professor, and Professor, Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph, 120 Main Street, East, Ridgetown, ON N0P 2C0, Canada
Darren E. Robinson
Affiliation:
Graduate Student, Adjunct Professor, Associate Professor, Associate Professor, and Professor, Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph, 120 Main Street, East, Ridgetown, ON N0P 2C0, Canada
Patrick J. Tranel
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Crop Science. University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, 1201 West Gregory Drive Urbana, IL 61801
Peter H. Sikkema
Affiliation:
Graduate Student, Adjunct Professor, Associate Professor, Associate Professor, and Professor, Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph, 120 Main Street, East, Ridgetown, ON N0P 2C0, Canada
*
1Corresponding author’s E-mail: soltanin@uoguelph.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Glyphosate-resistant (GR) common waterhemp is the fifth GR weed species confirmed in Canada, and the fourth in Ontario. As of 2017, GR common waterhemp has been confirmed in Lambton, Essex, and Chatham-Kent counties in Ontario. Greenhouse and field dose–response experiments revealed that GR common waterhemp in Ontario had a resistance level of 4.5 and 28, respectively, when compared with known glyphosate-susceptible populations. At 12 wk after application, pyroxasulfone/flumioxazin (240 g ai ha−1), pyroxasulfone/sulfentrazone (300 g ai ha−1), and S-metolachlor/metribuzin (1,943 g ai ha−1) controlled GR common waterhemp 97%, 92%, and 87%, respectively. Pyroxasulfone/sulfentrazone or S-metolachlor/metribuzin applied PRE followed by acifluorfen (600 g ai ha−1) or fomesafen (240 g ai ha−1) applied POST controlled GR common waterhemp 98% and performed better than PRE or POST alone. This research is the first to determine the resistance factor of GR common waterhemp in Ontario and identifies control strategies in soybean to mitigate the impact of common waterhemp interference in soybean crop production.

Keywords

AcifluorfenflumioxazinfomesafenglyphosateS-metolachlormetribuzinpyroxasulfonesulfentrazonecommon waterhemp, Amaranthus tuberculatus var. rudissoybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr.Biologically effective ratedistributiondose responseglyphosate susceptiblemanagementmultiple-resistant.
Type
Weed Management-Major Crops
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 31 , Issue 6 , December 2017 , pp. 811 - 821
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Associate Editor for this paper: William Johnson, Purdue University

References

Literature Cited

Behnken, ML, Breitenbach, F, Gunsolus, LJ, Bongard, P (2015) Managing common waterhemp in soybeans with layered residual herbicides—a strategy for controlling glyphosate resistant common waterhemp in Minnesota. Proc NCWSS 70:32 Google Scholar
Bell, MS, Hager, AG, Tranel, PJ (2013) Multiple resistance to herbicides from four site-of-action groups in common waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus). Weed Sci 61:460–468 Google Scholar
Bowley, S (2008) A Hitchhiker’s Guide to Statistics in Plant Biology 2nd edn. Guelph, ON: Any Old Subject Books Google Scholar
Burnside, OC, Wilson, RG, Weisberg, S, Hubbard, KG (1996) Seed longevity of 41 weed species buried 17 years in eastern and western Nebraska. Weed Sci 44:74–86 Google Scholar
Chatham, L, Bradley, K, Kruger, G, Martin, J, Owen, M, Peterson, D, Mithila, J, Tranel, P (2015a) A multi-state study of the association between glyphosate resistance and EPSPS gene amplification in common waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus). Weed Sci 63:569–577 Google Scholar
Chatham, LA, Wu, C, Riggins, CW, Hager, AG, Young, BG, Roskamp, GK, Tranel, PJ (2015b) EPSPS gene amplification is present in the majority of glyphosate-resistant Illinois common waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) populations. Weed Technol 29:48–55 Google Scholar
Costea, M, Weaver, SE, Tardif, FJ (2005) The biology of invasive alien plants in Canada. 3. Amaranthus tuberculatus (Moq.) Sauer var. rudis (Sauer) Costea and Tardif. Can J Plant Sci 85:507–522 Google Scholar
Duke, SO, Powles, SB (2008) Mini-review—Glyphosate: a once-in-a-century herbicide. Pest Manag Sci 64:319–325 Google Scholar
Franz, JE, Mao, MK, Sikorski, JA (1997) Glyphosate: A Unique Global Herbicide. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society Google Scholar
Gaines, TA, Zhang, W, Wang, D, Bukun, B, Chisholm, ST, Shaner, DL, Nissen, SJ, Patzoldt, WL, Tranel, PJ, Culpepper, AS, Grey, TL, Webster, TM, Vencill, WK, Sammons, RD, Jiang, J, Preston, C, Leach, JE, Westra, P (2010) Gene amplification confers glyphosate resistance in Amaranthus palmeri . Proc Natl Aca Sci USA 107:1029–1034 Google Scholar
Hartzler, RG, Battles, BA, Nordby, D (2004) Effect of common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) emergence date on growth and fecundity in soybean. Weed Sci 52:242–245 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heap, I (2017). The International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. www.weedscience.com. Accessed: March 2017Google Scholar
Jhala, JA, Malik, SM, Willis, BJ (2015) Weed control and crop tolerance of micro-encapsulated acetochlor applied sequentially in glyphosate-resistant soybean. Can J Plant Sci 95:973–981 Google Scholar
Legleiter, TR, Bradley, KW (2008) Glyphosate and multiple herbicide resistance in common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) populations from Missouri. Weed Sci 56:582–587 Google Scholar
Legleiter, TR, Bradley, KW, Massey, RE (2009) Glyphosate-resistant waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) control and economic returns with herbicide programs in soybean. Weed Technol 23:54–61 Google Scholar
Light, GG, Mohammed, MY, Dotray, PA, Chandler, JM, Wright, RJ (2011) Glyphosate-resistant common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) confirmed in Texas. Weed Technol 25:480–485 Google Scholar
Meyer, CJ, Norsworthy, JK, Young, BG, Steckel, LE, Bradley, KW, Johnson, WG, Loux, MM, Davis, VM, Kruger, GR, Bararpour, MT, Ikley, JT (2015) Herbicide program approaches for managing glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) and waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus and Amaranthus rudis) in future soybean-trait technologies. Weed Technol. 29:716–729 Google Scholar
Nandula, VK, Ray, JD, Ribeiro, DN, Pan, Z, Reddy, KN (2013) Glyphosate resistance in tall common waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) from Mississippi is due to both altered target-site and nontarget-site mechanisms. Weed Sci 61:374–383 Google Scholar
[OMAF] Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food. (2004). Problem Weed Control in Field Crops- Waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis). http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/crops/field/weeds/common_commonwaterhemp.htm. Accessed August 28, 2017Google Scholar
Powles, SB (2008) Review—Evolved glyphosate-resistant weeds around the world: lessons to be learnt. Pest Manag Sci 64:360–365 Google Scholar
Sarangi, D, Sandell, LD, Knezevic, SZ, Aulakh, JS, Lindquist, JL, Irmak, S, Jhala, AJ (2015a) Confirmation and control of glyphosate-resistant common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) in Nebraska. Weed Technol 29:82–92 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarangi, D, Sandell, LD, Knezevic, ZS, Irmak, S, Jhala, JA (2015b) Season long control of glyphosate resistant common waterhemp as influenced by split-applications of very long chain fatty acid synthesis inhibitors in soybean. Proc NCWSS 70:33 Google Scholar
SAS. (2012) SAS User’s Guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Google Scholar
Saxton, AM (1998). A macro for converting mean separation output to letter groupings in Proc Mixed. Pages 243–1246 in Proceeding of the SAS Users Group International 23. Cary, NC: SAS InstituteGoogle Scholar
Schryver, MG, Soltani, N, Hooker, DC, Tranel, PJ, Robinson, DE, Sikkema, PH (2017). Glyphosate-resistant and multiple-resistant common waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus var. rudis) in Ontario, Canada. Accepted 10.1139/CJPS-2016-0371Google Scholar
Shaner, DL (2009) Role of translocation as a mechanism of resistance to glyphosate. Weed Sci 57:118–123 Google Scholar
Shaner, DL, Lindenmeyer, RB, Ostlie, MH (2012) What have the mechanisms of resistance to glyphosate taught us? Pest Manag Sci 68:3–9 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shapiro, SS, Wilk, MB (1965) Analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika 52:591–611 Google Scholar
Sikorski, JA, Gruys, KJ (1997) Understanding glyphosate’s molecular mode of action with EPSP synthase: evidence favoring an allosteric inhibitor model. Accounts Chem Res 30:2–8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tranel, JP, Riggins, WC, Bell, SM, Hager, GA (2010) Herbicide resistances in Amaranthus tuberculatus: a call for new options. J Agric Food Chem 59:5808–5812 Google Scholar
Vyn, JD, Swanton, CJ, Weaver, SE, Sikkema, PH (2007) Control of herbicide-resistant common waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus var. rudis) with pre- and post-emergence herbicides in soybean. Can J Plant Sci 87:175–182 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, C, Owen, MDK (2014) When is the best time to emerge: reproductive phenology and success of natural common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) cohorts in the Midwest United States? Weed Sci 62:107–117 Google Scholar
Young, BG (2006) Changes in herbicide use patterns and production practices resulting from glyphosate-resistant crops. Weed Technol 20:301–307 CrossRefGoogle Scholar