Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T13:54:32.633Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Control of Volunteer Glyphosate-Resistant Soybean in Rice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Jason A. Bond  and
Timothy W. Walker
Jason A. Bond*
Affiliation:
Delta Research and Extension Center, Mississippi State University, Stoneville, MS 38776
Timothy W. Walker
Affiliation:
Delta Research and Extension Center, Mississippi State University, Stoneville, MS 38776
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: jbond@drec.msstate.edu.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Two field studies were conducted in 2007 and 2008 to evaluate at-planting burndown and POST herbicide applications targeting volunteer glyphosate-resistant (GR) soybean in rice. In the burndown study, paraquat, glufosinate, and a thifensulfuron plus tribenuron mixture were applied immediately after rice seeding. Paraquat controlled volunteer GR soybean at least 95% at all evaluations both years. Control with glufosinate was greater in 2007 than 2008 due to rainfall that occurred following application the second year. The thifensulfuron plus tribenuron mixture provided similar control in both years, but control never exceeded 71%. Additionally, a study was conducted evaluating POST-applied rice herbicides including propanil (4,480 and 2,240 g ai/ha), triclopyr (420 and 210 g ai/ha), bispyribac-sodium (38 and 19 g ai/ha), penoxsulam (40 and 20 g ai/ha), and halosulfuron (70 and 35 g ai/ha). Control across all POST herbicides and application rates was equivalent (> 95%) 28 and 56 d after application except for propanil, which controlled volunteer GR soybean less than other treatments. Volunteer GR soybean can be effectively managed in a rice production system with at-planting burndown or POST herbicide applications in rice.

Keywords

Bispyribac-sodiumglufosinatehalosulfuronparaquatpenoxsulampropanilthifensulfurontribenurontriclopyrrice, Oryza sativa L.soybean, Glycine max (L.) MerrApplication rateburndownherbicidereduced tillageweed control programs
Type
Weed Management—Major Crops
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 23 , Issue 2 , June 2009 , pp. 225 - 230
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous 2004. Ignite herbicide label. http://www.greenbook.net. Accessed: August 20, 2008.Google Scholar
Anonymous 2005. Gramoxone Inteon herbicide label. http://www.greenbook.net. Accessed: August 20, 2008.Google Scholar
Anonymous 2007. Rice 2008 Planning Budgets. Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2006-04. Mississippi State, MS: Mississippi State University.Google Scholar
Anonymous 2008a. Delta Agricultural Weather Center. Mississippi State University Extension Service and Mississippi Agriculture and Forestry Experiment Station. http://www.deltaweather.msstate.edu/. Accessed: August 20, 2008.Google Scholar
Anonymous 2008b. Harmony Extra herbicide label. http://www.greenbook.net. Accessed: August 20, 2008.Google Scholar
Anonymous 2008c. 2008 Weed control guidelines for Mississippi. Mississippi State, MS: Mississippi State University Extension Service and Mississippi Agriculture and Forestry Experiment Station. Publ. 1532.Google Scholar
Boydston, R. A. and Seymour, M. D. 2002. Volunteer potato (Solanum tuberosum) control with herbicides and cultivation in onion (Allium cepa). Weed Technol 16:620–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coertzer, E., Al-Khatib, K., and Loughlin, T. M. 2001. Glufosinate efficacy, absorption, and translocation in amaranth as affected by relative humidity and temperature. Weed Sci 49:8–13.Google Scholar
Fageria, N. K., Baligar, V. C., and Jones, C. A. 1997. Growth and Mineral Nutrition of Field Crops. 2nd ed. New York: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
[IRRI] International Rice Research Institute 1995. Rice Facts. Los Banos, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute.Google Scholar
Kurtz, M. E., Snipes, C. E., Street, J. E., and Cooke, F. T. Jr. 1993. Soybean yield increases in Mississippi due to rotations with rice. Miss. Agric. For. Exp. Stn. Bull 994.Google Scholar
Linscombe, S. D., Saichuk, J. K., Seilhan, K. P., Bollich, P. K., and Funderburg, E. R. 1999. General agronomic guidelines. Pages 5–12. in. Louisiana Rice Production Handbook. Louisiana State University Agriculture Center Publication 2321. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University Agriculture Center.Google Scholar
Miller, T. C. and Street, J. E. 1999. Mississippi Rice Growers Guide. Mississippi State University Extension Series Publication No. 2255. Mississippi State, MS: Mississippi State University.Google Scholar
Murdock, E. C., Jones, M. A., and Graham, R. F. 2002. Control of glyphosate (Roundup)-tolerant cotton and soybean in Roundup Ready cotton. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc 55:14.Google Scholar
Nandula, V. K., Poston, D. H., Eubank, T. W., Blessitt, J. B., and Whiting, K. 2008. Response of selected soybean varieties to halosulfuron-methyl. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc 61:27.Google Scholar
[NASS] National Agricultural Statistics Service 2008. Agricultural Statistics Database—U.S. & All States Data—Crops. http://www.nass.usda.gov/QuickStats/PullData_US.jsp. Accessed: August 19, 2008.Google Scholar
Peng, S. and Yang, J. 2003. Current status of the research on high-yielding and high efficiency in resource use and improving grain quality in rice. Chin. J. Rice Sci 17:275–280.Google Scholar
Qin, Y., Cairns, A., and Powles, S. B. 2004. Paraquat resistance in a population of Lolium rigidum. Funct. Plant Biol 31:247–254.Google Scholar
SAS Institute 2007. The SAS System for Windows. Release 9.2. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.Google Scholar
Senseman, S. A. 2007. Herbicide Handbook. 9th ed. Champaign, IL: Weed Science Society of America. 169–171.Google Scholar
Slaton, N. A. and Cartwright, R. D. 2001. Rice stand establishment. Pages 21–28. in. Rice Production Handbook. Cooperative Extension Service Publication MP 192. Little Rock, AR: University of Arkansas.Google Scholar
Smith, R. J. Jr. 1968. Weed competition in rice. Weed Sci 16:252–255.Google Scholar
Street, J. E. and Bollich, P. K. 2003. Rice production. Pages 271–296. In Smith, C. W. and Dilday, R. H. Rice: Origin, History, Technology, and Production. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Tingle, C. H. and Beach, A. 2003. Competitiveness of volunteer Roundup Ready crops. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc 56:339.Google Scholar
Webster, T. M. 2008. Weed survey—Grass crops subsection. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc 61:224–243.Google Scholar
Young, B. G. and Hart, S. E. 1997. Control of volunteer sethoxydim-resistant corn (Zea mays) in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol 11:649–655.Google Scholar
Zhang, W., Webster, E. P., Lanclos, D. Y., and Geaghan, J. P. 2003. Effect of weed interference duration and weed-free period on glufosinate-resistant rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Technol 17:876–880.Google Scholar