Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:32:42.940Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Control of Volunteer Herbicide-Resistant Wheat and Canola

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Curtis R. Rainbolt ,
Donald C. Thill  and
Frank L. Young
Curtis R. Rainbolt*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant, Soil, and Entomological Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844-2339
Donald C. Thill
Affiliation:
Department of Plant, Soil, and Entomological Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844-2339
Frank L. Young
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164-6416
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: crrainbolt@ifas.ufl.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Volunteer crops resistant to glyphosate and other herbicides pose a potential problem for Pacific Northwest (PNW) growers that rely on glyphosate for control of volunteer crops and weeds during fallow and before planting. Herbicides for control of volunteer herbicide-resistant wheat and canola in PNW conservation tillage systems were evaluated during 2000 and 2001 near Ralston, WA, and Moscow, ID. Paraquat + diuron controlled glyphosate- and imidazolinone-resistant wheat ≥90%, and glyphosate controlled imidazolinone-resistant wheat 88 to 96% 14 d after treatment (DAT). Glyphosate- and imidazolinone-resistant wheat were controlled only 58 to 85% with quizalofop-P and clethodim 14 DAT. By 21 DAT, imidazolinone-resistant wheat control with clethodim and quizalofop-P was ≥93%, but the longer time period required for control to reach an acceptable level could increase disease and insect problems associated with volunteer wheat. Volunteer glyphosate-resistant canola was controlled 92 and 97% 14 DAT and 76 and 98% 21 DAT with paraquat and paraquat + diuron, respectively. Treatments that contained glyphosate controlled imidazolinone- and glufosinate-resistant canola >84% 14 DAT. By 21 DAT, control of imidazolinone- and glufosinate-resistant canola was 94 to 98% with paraquat + diuron and all glyphosate treatments, except glyphosate–isopropylamine salt (IPA) + glufosinate (88 to 93%) and glyphosate-IPA + paraquat (67 to 85%). In these studies, paraquat + diuron was the best alternative to glyphosate for controlling volunteer herbicide-resistant wheat and canola.

Keywords

Clethodimdiuronglufosinateglyphosateimidazolinoneparaquatquizalofop-Pcanola, Brassica napus L. ‘DKL 27-20’, ‘Phoenix’, ‘Pioneer 45A71’wheat, Triticum aestivum L. ‘Bobwhite’, ‘FS-4 IR’Direct seedingglufosinate resistantglyphosate resistantgreen-bridgeimidazolinone resistantACCase, acetyl coenzyme A carboxylaseDA, diammonium saltDAT, days after treatmentHRC, herbicide-resistant cropsIPA, isopropylamine saltPNW, Pacific Northwest
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 18 , Issue 3 , September 2004 , pp. 711 - 718
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

∗ Published with approval of the Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Idaho, as Journal Article 03730.

References

Literature Cited

Ahrens, W. H. ed. 1994. Herbicide Handbook. 7th ed. Champaign, IL: Weed Science Society of America. 352 p.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 2004. Greenbook. Vance Publishing Corporation. Web page: http://www.greenbook.net. Accessed: June 9, 2004.Google Scholar
Bayliss, A. D. 2000. Why glyphosate is a global herbicide: strengths, weaknesses and prospects. Pest Manag. Sci 56:299–308.3.0.CO;2-K>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blue, E. N., Mason, S. C., and Sander, D. H. 1990. Influence of planting date, seeding rate, and phosphorous rate on wheat yield. Agron. J 82:762–768.Google Scholar
Carmer, S. G., Nyquist, W. E., and Walker, W. M. 1989. Least significant differences for combined analyses of experiments with two- or three-factor treatment designs. Agron. J 81:665–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ciha, A. J. 1983. Seeding rate and seeding date effects on spring seeded small grain cultivars. Agron. J 75:795–799.Google Scholar
Cook, R. J. and Veseth, R. J. 1991. Wheat health management before planting. Pages 105–120 in Wheat Health Management. St. Paul, MN: American Phytopathological Society. Pp. 87-104.Google Scholar
Dahlke, B. J., Oplinger, E. S., Gaska, J. M., and Martinka, M. J. 1993. Influence of planting date and seeding rate on winter wheat grain yield and yield components. J. Prod. Agric 6:408–414.Google Scholar
Devine, M. D. and Shimabukuro, R. H. 1994. Resistance to acetyl coenzyme A carboxylase inhibiting herbicides. in Powles, S. B. and Holtum, J.A.M., eds. Herbicide Resistance in Plants: Biology and Biochemistry. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis. Pp. 154–155.Google Scholar
Hall, L., Topinka, K., Huffman, J., Davis, L., and Good, A. 2000. Pollen flow between herbicide-resistant Brassica napus is the cause of multiple-resistant B. napus volunteers. Weed Sci. 48:688–694.Google Scholar
James, C. 2000. Global Review of Commercialized Transgenic Crops: 2000. ISAAA Briefs No. 21. Ithaca, NY: ISAAA. 110 p.Google Scholar
Jørgenson, R. B. and Anderson, B. 1994. Spontaneous hybridization between oilseed rape (Brassica napus) and weedy B. campestris (Brassicaceae): a risk of growing genetically modified oilseed rape. Am. J. Bot 81:1620–1626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Légère, A., Beckie, H. J., Stevenson, F. C., and Thomas, A. G. 2000. Survey of management practices affecting the occurrence of wild oat (Avena fatua) resistance to acetyl-CoA carboxylase inhibitors. Weed Technol. 14:366–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lutman, P. J. W. 1993. The occurrence and persistence of volunteer oilseed rape (Brassica napus). Asp. Appl. Biol 35:29–36.Google Scholar
Lyon, D. J., Bussan, A. J., Evans, J. O., Mallory-Smith, C. A., and Peeper, T. F. 2002. Pest management implications of glyphosate-resistant wheat (Triticum aestivum) in the western United States. Weed Technol. 16:680–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mallory-Smith, C. and Hyslop, G. R. 1999. Herbicide-resistant crops: issues, impacts, and implications. Proc. West. Soc. Weed Sci 52:3–6.Google Scholar
Marshall, G. 1998. Herbicide tolerant crops—real farmer opportunity or potential environmental problem? Pestic. Sci 52:394–402.Google Scholar
Ogg, A. G. Jr. and Isakson, P. J. 2001. Agronomic benefits and concerns for Roundup-Ready® wheat. Proc. West. Soc. Weed Sci 54:80–90.Google Scholar
Ogg, A. G. Jr. and Parker, R. 2000. Control of volunteer crop plants. Pullman, WA: Washington State University Extension Bull. EB1523. Pp. 1–4.Google Scholar
Radosevich, S. R., Ghersa, C. M., and Comstock, G. 1992. Concerns a weed scientist might have about herbicide-tolerant crops. Weed Technol. 6:635–639.Google Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 1994. SAS User's Guide: Statistics. Version 6.0. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 1686 p.Google Scholar
Schillinger, W. F., Cook, R. J., and Papendick, R. I. 1999. Increased dryland cropping intensity with no-till barley. Agron. J 91:744–752.Google Scholar
Seefeldt, S. S., Zemetra, R., Young, F. L., and Jones, S. S. 1998. Production of herbicide-resistant jointed goatgrass (Aegilops cylindrica) × wheat (Triticum aestivum) hybrids in the field by natural hybridization. Weed Sci. 46:632–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shah, S. A., Harrison, S. A., Boquet, D. J., Colyer, P. D., and Moore, S. H. 1994. Management effects on yield components of late-planted wheat. Crop Sci 34:1298–1303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simard, M. J., Légère, A., Pageau, D., Lajeunesse, J., and Warwick, S. 2002. The frequency and persistence of volunteer canola (Brassica napus) in Quebec cropping systems. Weed Technol. 16:433–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simard, M. and Légère, A. 2002. Control of volunteer canola with auxinic herbicides: does cold hardening or plant size matter?. Web page: http://www.cwss-scm.ca/pdf/cwss_SCM_Saskatoon_Meeting_2002.pdf. Accessed: August 12, 2004.Google Scholar
Smiley, R. W., Ogg, A. G. Jr., and Cook, R. J. 1992. Influence of glyphosate on Rhizoctonia root rot, growth, and yield of barley. Plant Dis 76:937–942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thill, D. C. 1996. Managing the spread of herbicide resistance. in Duke, S. O., ed. Herbicide-Resistant Crops: Agricultural, Environmental, Economic, Regulatory, and Technical Aspects. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis. P. 331.Google Scholar
Van Acker, R., Thomas, G., Leeson, J., Andrews, T., and Brown, K. 2002. What's up? Preliminary results from the 2002 Manitoba survey of weeds in cereal and oilseed crops. Proc. Manitoba Agron. Conf 3:109–115.Google Scholar
Veseth, R. 1993a. “Green-bridge” control starts in the fall. PNW Conservation Tillage Handbook Series. Chapter 4, No. 18. Pullman, WA: Washington State University. 3 p.Google Scholar
Veseth, R. 1993b. “Green-bridge” key to root disease control. PNW Conservation Tillage Handbook Series. Chapter 4, No. 16. Pullman, WA: Washington State University. 7 p.Google Scholar
Young, F. L., Ogg, A. G. Jr., Papendick, R. I., Thill, D. C., and Alldredge, J. R. 1994. Tillage and weed management affects winter wheat yield in an integrated pest management system. Agron. J 86:147–154.Google Scholar
Young, F. L., Yenish, J. P., Walenta, D. L., Ball, D. A., and Alldrege, J. R. 2003. Spring-germinating jointed goatgrass produces viable spikelets in spring seeded wheat. Weed Sci. 51:379–385.Google Scholar