Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:25:32.940Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cover Crop and Postemergence Herbicide Integration for Palmer amaranth Control in Cotton

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2017

Matthew S. Wiggins ,
Robert M. Hayes ,
Robert L. Nichols  and
Lawrence E. Steckel
Matthew S. Wiggins
Affiliation:
Former Graduate Research Assistant, Professor, Professor, Department of Plant Sciences, University of Tennessee, 605 Airways Blvd., Jackson, TN 38301
Robert M. Hayes
Affiliation:
Former Graduate Research Assistant, Professor, Professor, Department of Plant Sciences, University of Tennessee, 605 Airways Blvd., Jackson, TN 38301
Robert L. Nichols
Affiliation:
Senior Director, Cotton Incorporated, 6399 Weston Park Way, Carey, NC 27513
Lawrence E. Steckel*
Affiliation:
Former Graduate Research Assistant, Professor, Professor, Department of Plant Sciences, University of Tennessee, 605 Airways Blvd., Jackson, TN 38301
*
*Corresponding author’s E-mail: lsteckel@utk.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted to evaluate the integration of cover crops and POST herbicides to control glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth in cotton. The winter-annual grasses accumulated the greatest amount of biomass and provided the most Palmer amaranth control. The estimates for the logistic regression would indicate that 1540 kg ha−1 would delay Palmer amaranth emerging and growing to 10 cm by an estimated 16.5 days. The Palmer amaranth that emerged in the cereal rye and wheat cover crop treatments took a longer time to reach 10 cm compared to the hairy vetch and crimson clover treatments. POST herbicides were needed for adequate control of Palmer amaranth. The glufosinate-based weed control system provided greater control (75% vs 31%) of Palmer amaranth than did the glyphosate system. These results indicate that a POST only herbicide weed management system did not provide sufficient control of Palmer amaranth, even when used in conjunction with cover crops that produced a moderate level of biomass. Therefore, future recommendations for GR Palmer amaranth control will include integrating cover crops with PRE herbicides, overlaying residual herbicides in-season, timely POST herbicide applications, and hand weeding in order to achieve season-long control of this pest.

Keywords

GlufosinateglyphosatePalmer amaranth, Amaranthus palmeri S. Wats.cereal rye, Secale cereale L.cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L.crimson clover, Trifolium incarnatum L.hairy vetch, Vicia villosa Roth.winter wheat, Triticum aestivum L.Conservation agriculturecultural weed controlresistance management
Type
Weed Management-Major Crops
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 31 , Issue 3 , June 2017 , pp. 348 - 355
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Associate Editor for this paper: Daniel Stephenson, Louisana State University Agricultural Center.

References

Literature Cited

Bond, JA, Oliver, LR (2006) Comparative growth of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) accessions. Weed Sci 54:121–126 Google Scholar
Bond, JA, Oliver, LR, Stephenson, IV DO (2006) Response of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) accessions to glyphosate, fomesafen, and pyrithiobac. Weed Technol 20:885–892 Google Scholar
Branson, JW, Smith, KL, Barrentine, JL (2005) Comparison of trifloxysulfuron and pyrithiobac in glyphosate-resistant and bromoxynil-resistant cotton. Weed Technol 19:404–410 Google Scholar
Coetzer, E, al-Khalib, K, Peterson, DE (2002) Glufosinate efficacy on Amaranthus species in glufosinate-resistant soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Technol 16:326–331 Google Scholar
Corbett, JL, Askew, SD, Thomas, WE, Wilcut, JW (2004) Weed efficacy evaluations for bromoxynil, glufosinate, glyphosate, pyrithiobac, and sulfosate. Weed Technol 18:443–453 Google Scholar
Culpepper, AS, Webster, TM, Sosnoskie, LM, York, AC (2010) Glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth in the United States. Pages 195–212 in Nandula VK, ed. Glyphosate Resistance in Crops and Weeds—History, Development and Management. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley Google Scholar
Culpepper, AS, York, AC (1998) Weed management in glyphosate-tolerant cotton. J Cotton Sci 2:174–185 Google Scholar
Culpepper, AS, York, AC, Roberts, P, Whitaker, JR (2009) Weed control and crop response to glufosinate applied to ‘PHY 485 WRF’ cotton. Weed Technol 23:356–362 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duck, BN, Tyler, DD (1996) No-till winter cover crops: management and production. Tennessee Agri-Sci 179:12–16 Google Scholar
Duke, SO, Powles, SB (2009) Glyphosate-resistant crops and weeds: now and in the future. AgBioForum 12:346–347 Google Scholar
Edmisten, WJ, Yelverton, FH, Spers, JF, Bowman, DT, Bacheler, JS, Koenning, SR, Crozier, CR, Meijer, AD, Culpepper, AS (2010) 2010 Cotton information. North Carolina State University Cooperative Extension Publication. http://ipm.ncsu.edu/Production_Guides/Cotton/contents.pdf. Accessed August 14, 2014Google Scholar
Ehleringer, J (1983) Ecophysiology of Amaranthus palmeri, a Sonoran desert summer annual. Oecologia 57:107–112 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Everman, WJ, Burke, IC, Allen, JR, Collins, J, Wilcut, JW (2007) Weed control and yield with glufosinate-resistant cotton weed management systems. Weed Technol 21:695–701 Google Scholar
Fernandez-Cornejo, J, Caswell, M (2006) The first decade of genetically engineered crops in the United States. Washington, DC: United States Department of Agriculture - Economic Research Services Economic Information Bulletin No. 11 Google Scholar
Fisk, JW, Hersterman, OB, Shrestha, A, Kells, JJ, Harwood, RR, Squire, JM, Sheaffer, CC (2001) Weed suppression by annual legume cover crops in no-tillage corn. Agron J 93:319–325 Google Scholar
Gardner, AP, York, AC, Jordan, DL, Monks, DW (2006) Management of annual grasses and Amaranthus spp. in glufosinate-resistant cotton. J Cotton Sci 10:328–338 Google Scholar
Hartwig, NL, Hoffman, LD (1975) Suppression of perennial legume and grass cover crops for no-tillage corn. Proc Northeast Weed Sci Soc 29:82–88 Google Scholar
Horak, MJ, Loughin, TM (2000) Growth analysis of four Amaranthus species. Weed Sci 48:347–355 Google Scholar
Keeley, PE, Carter, CH, Thullen, RJ (1987) Influence of planting date on growth of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri). Weed Sci 35:199–204 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klingaman, TE, Oliver, LR (1994) Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) interference in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci 42:523–527 Google Scholar
Liebel, R, Simmons, FW, Wax, LM, Stoller, EW (1992) Effect of rye (Secale cereale) mulch on weed control and soil moisture in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol 6:838–846 Google Scholar
MacRae, AW, Webster, TM, Sosnoskie, LM, Culpepper, AS, Kichler, JM (2013) Cotton yield loss potential in response to length of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) interference. J Cotton Sci 17:227–232 Google Scholar
Main, CL (2014) Cotton Production, Insects and Diseases. Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee Extension. Publication W288Google Scholar
Moore, MJ, Gillespie, TJ, Swanton, CJ (1994) Effect of cover crop mulches on weed emergence, weed biomass, and soybean (Glycine max) development. Weed Technol 8:512–518 Google Scholar
Morgan, GD, Baumann, PA, Chandler, JM (2001) Competitive impact of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmer) on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) development and yield. Weed Technol 15:408–412 Google Scholar
Natural Resource Conservation Service of Tennessee (2014) 2014 Environmental Quality Incentives Program: Cover Crop Requirements in Tennessee. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/tn/programs/financial/eqip/?cid=nrcs141p2_016426. Accessed December 22, 2016Google Scholar
Norsworthy, JK, McClelland, M, Griffith, G, Bangarwa, SK, Still, J (2010) Evaluation of legume cover crops and weed control programs in conservation-tillage, enhanced glyphosate-resistant cotton. Weed Technol 24:269–274 Google Scholar
Price, AJ, Balkcom, KS, Culpepper, SA, Kelton, JA, Nichols, RL, Schomberg, H (2011) Glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth: a threat to conservation tillage. J Soil Water Conserv 66:265–275 Google Scholar
Price, AJ, Balkcom, KS, Duzy, LM, Kelton, JA (2012) Herbicide and cover crop residue integration for Amaranthus control in conservation agriculture cotton and implications for resistance management. Weed Technol 26:490–498 Google Scholar
Price, AJ, Monks, CD, Culpepper, AS, Duzy, LM, Kelton, JA, Marshall, MW, Steckel, LS, Sosnoskie, LM, Nichols, R (2016) High residue cover crops alone or with strategic tillage to manage glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in southeastern cotton (Gossypioum hirsutum). J Soil Water Conserv 71:1–11 Google Scholar
Reddy, KN (2001) Effects of cereal and legume cover crops residues on weeds, yield, and net return in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol 15:660–668 Google Scholar
Sauer, JD (1957) Recent migration and evolution of the dioecious amaranths. Evolution 11:11–31 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savoy, HJ, Joines, DK (2009) Liming and fertilizer recommendations for the various crops of Tennessee. Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee Extension. Publication PB1096Google Scholar
Sellers, BA, Smeda, RJ, Johnson, WG, Kendig, JA, Ellersieck, MR (2003) Comparative growth of six Amaranthus species in Missouri. Weed Sci 51:329–333 Google Scholar
Steckel, LE (2007) The dioecious Amaranthus ssp.: here to stay. Weed Technol 21:567–570 Google Scholar
Steckel, LE, Culpepper, AS (2016) Cover crop value: managing Palmer amaranth now and in the future. Page 312 in Beltwide Cotton Conference. Memphis, TN: National Cotton CouncilGoogle Scholar
Teasdale, JR (1996) Contribution of cover crops to weed management in sustainable agricultural systems. J Prod Agric 9:475–479 Google Scholar
Webster, TM, Sosnoskie, LM (2010) A changing weed spectrum in Georgia cotton. Weed Sci 58:73–79 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitaker, JA, York, A, Jordan, D, Culpepper, AS (2011) Weed management with glyphosate- and glufosinate-based systems in PHY 485 WRF cotton. Weed Technol 25:183–191 Google Scholar
White, RH, Worsham, AD (1990) Control of legume cover crops in no-till corn (Zea mays) and cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Technol 4:57–62 Google Scholar
Wiggins, MS, Hayes, RM, Steckel, LE (2016) Evaluating cover crops and herbicides for glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) control in cotton. Weed Technol 30:415–422 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiggins, MS, McClure, MA, Hayes, RM, Steckel, LE (2015) Integrating cover crops and POST herbicides for glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) control in corn. Weed Technol 29:412–418 Google Scholar
Wise, AM, Grey, TL, Prostko, EP, Vencill, WK, Webster, TM (2009) Establishing the geographical distribution and level of acetolactate synthase resistance to Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) accessions in Georgia. Weed Technol 23:214–220 Google Scholar
Young, BG (2006) Changes in herbicide use patterns and production practices resulting from glyphosate-resistant crops. Weed Technol 21:301–307 Google Scholar