Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T13:03:39.242Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cross-Resistance of a Large Crabgrass (Digitaria sanguinalis) Accession to Aryloxyphenoxypropionate and Cyclohexanedione Herbicides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Ronald J. Wierholt  and
David E. Stoltenberg
Ronald J. Wierholt
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706
David E. Stoltenberg
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A large crabgrass population (PW2) that demonstrated resistance to fluazifop-P and sethoxydim was identified in Wisconsin during 1992. Dose-response experiments were conducted in the greenhouse to determine the level of resistance of a PW2 large crabgrass accession to aryloxyphenoxypropionate (APP), cyclohexanedione (CHD), and other herbicide chemistries relative to a large crabgrass accession (A310) which was susceptible to APP and CHD herbicides. Based on shoot dry biomass reduction, the PW2 accession was 337- and 59-fold resistant to sethoxydim and fluazifop-P, respectively, relative to the A310 accession. Resistance of the PW2 accession to fenoxaprop, haloxyfop, quizalofop, and diclofop ranged from 18- to 29-fold. The PW2 accession was only 7-fold resistant to clethodim. Both large crabgrass accessions were susceptible to imazethapyr and linuron. These results suggest that APP and CHD herbicides will be ineffective for the management of the PW2 accession. An integrated approach including cultural, mechanical, and alternative chemical methods, should be implemented for the management of the PW2 accession and to prevent additional resistance problems.

Keywords

diclofop, methyl ester of (±)-2-[4-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)phenoxy]propanoic acidsethoxydim, 2-[1-(ethoxyimino)butyl]-5-[2-(ethylthio)propyl]-3-hydroxy-2-cyclohexen-1-onelarge crabgrass, Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop. # DIGSADose-responseherbicide resistanceACCase inhibitorsgraminicidesAllium cepaDaucun carotaZea maysDIGSA
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 9 , Issue 3 , September 1995 , pp. 518 - 524
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Barrentine, W. L., Snipes, C. E., and Smeda, R. J. 1992. Herbicide resistance confirmed in johnsongrass biotypes. Miss. Agric. For. Exp. Stn. Res. Rep. Mississippi State Univ. 17(5). 5 p.Google Scholar
2. Box, G.E.P. and Cox, D. R. 1964. An analysis of transformations. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. B26:211–252.Google Scholar
3. Devine, M. D. and Shimabukuro, R. H. 1994. Resistance to acetyl coenzyme Acarboxylase inhibiting herbicides. p. 141–169 in Powles, S. B. and Holtum, J.A.M., eds. Herbicide Resistance in Plants: Biology and Biochemistry. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
4. Draper, N. R. and Smith, H. 1980. An introduction to nonlinear estimation. p. 458–517 in Applied Regression Analysis, 2nd ed. John Wiley and Sons, NY.Google Scholar
5. Frie, J. B., Zollinger, R. K., Manthey, F. A., and Durgan, B. R. 1993. Wild oat (Avena fatua L.) resistance to diclofop in the Red River Valley. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 48:16.Google Scholar
6. Gressel, J., Ammon, H. U., Fogelfors, H., Gasquez, J., Kay, Q. O. N., and Kees, H. 1982. Discovery and distribution of herbicide-resistant weeds outside North America. p. 31–56 in LeBaron, H. M. and Gressel, J., eds. Herbicide Resistance in Plants. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., NY.Google Scholar
7. Gronwald, J. W. 1994. Resistance to photosystem II inhibiting herbicides. p. 27–60 in Powles, S. B. and Holtum, J.A.M., eds. Herbicide Resistance in Plants: Biology and Biochemistry. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
8. Gronwald, J. W. 1991. Lipid biosynthesis inhibitors. Weed Sci. 39:435–449.Google Scholar
9. Heap, J. and Knight, R. J. 1982. A population of ryegrass tolerant to the herbicide diclofop-methyl. J. Aust. Inst. Agric. Sci. 48:156–157.Google Scholar
10. Heap, I. M. and Morrison, I. N. 1993. Resistance to aryloxyphenoxypropionate and cyclohexanedione herbicides in green foxtail [Setaria viridis (L.) Beauv.]. Weed Sci. Soc Am. Abstr. 33:62.Google Scholar
11. Heap, I. M., Murray, B. G., Loeppky, H. A., and Morrison, I. N. 1993. Resistance to aryloxyphenoxypropionate and cyclohexanedione herbicides in wild oat (Avena fatua). Weed Sci. 41:232–238.Google Scholar
12. Holm, L. G., Plucknett, D. L., Pancho, J. V., and Herberger, J. P. 1977. Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop. p. 92–97 in The World's Worst Weeds. Distribution and Biology. The Univ. Press of Hawaii, Honolulu.Google Scholar
13. Joseph, O. O., Hobbs, S.L.A., and Jana, S. 1990. Diclofop resistance in wild oats (Avena fatua). Weed Sci. 38:475–479.Google Scholar
14. Kemp, M. S., Moss, S. R., and Thomas, T. H. 1990. Herbicide resistance in Alopecurus myosuroides . p. 376–393 in Green, M. B., LeBaron, H. M., and Moberg, W. K., eds. Managing Resistance to Agrochemicals: from Fundamental Research to Practical Strategies. Am. Chem. Soc. Symp. Series 421, Am. Chem. Soc., Washington, D.C. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Kudsk, P., Mathiassen, S. K., and Cotterman, J. C. 1995. Sulfonylurea resistance in Stellaria media L. Vill. Weed Res. (In press).Google Scholar
16. Mansooji, A. M., Holtum, J. A., Boutsalis, P., Matthews, J. M., and Powles, S. B. 1992. Resistance to aryloxyphenoxypropionate herbicides in two wild oat species (Avena fatua and Avena sterilis ssp. ludoviciana). Weed Sci. 40:599–605.Google Scholar
17. Marshall, G., Kirkwood, R. C., and Leach, G. E. 1994. Comparative studies on graminicide-resistant and susceptible biotypes of Eleusine indica . Weed Res. 34:177–185.Google Scholar
18. Matthews, J. M. 1994. Management of herbicide resistant weed populations. p. 317–335 in Powles, S. B. and Holtum, J.A.M., eds. Herbicide Resistance in Plants: Biology and Biochemistry. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
19. Moss, S. R. 1990. Herbicide cross-resistance in slender foxtail (Alopecurus myosuroides). Weed Sci. 38:492–496.Google Scholar
20. Powles, S. B. and Mathews, J. A. 1992. Multiple herbicide resistance in annual ryegrass (Lolium rigidum): A driving force for the adoption of integrated weed management. p. 75–87 in Denholm, I., Devonshire, A. L., and Hollomon, D. W., eds. Resistance '91: Achievements and Developments in Combating Pesticide Resistance. SCI, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Seefeldt, S. S., Gealy, D. R., Brewster, B. D., and Fuerst, E. P. 1994. Cross-resistance of several diclofop-resistant wild oat (Avena fatua) biotypes from the Willamette Valley of Oregon. Weed Sci. 42:430–437.Google Scholar
22. Stanger, C. E. and Appleby, A. P. 1989. Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) accessions tolerant to diclofop. Weed Sci. 37:350–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Stoltenberg, D. E and Wiederholt, R. J. 1995. Giant foxtail (Setaria faberi) resistance to aryloxyphenoxypropionate and cyclohexanedione herbicides. Weed Sci. (In press).Google Scholar
24. Streibig, J. C., Rudemo, M., and Jensen, J. E. 1993. Dosage-response curves and statistical models. p. 29–55 in Streibig, J. C. and Kudsk, P., eds. Herbicide Bioassays. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
25. Tardif, F. J., Holtum, J. A. M., and Powles, S. B. 1993. Occurrence of a herbicide-resistant acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase mutant in annual ryegrass (Lolium rigidum) selected by sethoxydim. Planta 190:176–181.Google Scholar
26. van Oorschot, J.L.P. 1991. Chloroplastic resistance of weeds to triazines in Europe. p. 87–103 in Caseley, J. C., Cussans, G. W., and Atkin, R. K., eds. Herbicide Resistance in Weeds and Crops. Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd., Oxford.Google Scholar
27. Wiederholt, R. J. and Stoltenberg, D. E. 1993. Large crabgrass [Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop.] resistance to several acetyl-CoA carboxylase inhibitors. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 48:20.Google Scholar